HR7659-118

Passed House

To authorize and amend authorities, programs, and statutes administered by the Coast Guard.

118th Congress Introduced Mar 13, 2024

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Authorizes appropriations for the Coast Guard for fiscal years 2025 and 2026, including operating expenses, acquisition programs, reserve training, and retired pay. Provides significant funding increases for Coast Guard operations.

Who Benefits and How

Coast Guard personnel benefit from authorized funding and programs. Maritime safety and security benefit from continued Coast Guard operations. Retired Coast Guard members receive continued pay and benefits.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal taxpayers fund authorized appropriations. The bill authorizes but does not appropriate funds.

Key Provisions

  • FY2025: $11.287 billion operating expenses; FY2026: $11.852 billion
  • Acquisition funding: $3.478 billion (FY25), $3.651 billion (FY26)
  • Research and development funding authorized
  • Retired pay and survivor benefits covered

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024

Who Benefits

  • Coast Guard personnel
  • Maritime safety
  • Retired Coast Guard members

Who Bears Costs

  • Federal taxpayers

Key Policy Areas

Coast Guard, Maritime Security, Defense

Primary Purpose

Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024

Policy Domains

Coast Guard Maritime Security Defense

Legislative Strategy

"Annual Coast Guard authorization with significant funding increases"

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
May 15, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

May 8, 2024

Additional sponsor: Mrs. González-Colón

May 8, 2024

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Mar 13, 2024

Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, …

Mar 13, 2024 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
67 mentions across 67 clauses
+29 positive -34 negative ?4 uncertain

Academy administration, Academy assault victims, Assault reporters

Coast Guard, Coast Guard acquisition programs face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Academy assault victims, Assault reporters, Assault victims, Coast Guard Academy, Coast Guard Academy cadets who are assault victims, Coast Guard Recruiting Command, Coast Guard Reserve members, Coast Guard Reserve members with new children, Coast Guard Reserve parents, Coast Guard crime victims, Coast Guard members reporting sexual assault, Coast Guard members seeking career breaks, Coast Guard members who are sexual assault victims, Coast Guard officers with military justice/healthcare expertise, Coast Guard officers with specialized expertise, Coast Guard operations and procurement, Coast Guard personnel, Coast Guard reporting offices, Pregnant Coast Guard officers, Senior enlisted Coast Guard personnel, Senior enlisted personnel, Specialized officers

Negative-direction: Academy administration, CGIS, Coast Guard Academy administration, Coast Guard Commandant, Coast Guard HR, Coast Guard Investigative Service, Coast Guard Sector San Juan, Coast Guard acquisition office, Coast Guard housing program, Coast Guard housing program administration, Coast Guard procurement, Coast Guard public affairs, Coast Guard research labs, Coast Guard units in tsunami zones, Coast Guard units in tsunami-prone areas, Former Coast Guard members with sexual offense histories, Former Coast Guard members with sexual offenses, Former members, Former members with offenses, GAO, Government Accountability Office, National Response Center

Transportation
49 mentions across 45 clauses
+27 positive -16 negative ?6 uncertain

Active merchant mariners, American Bureau of Shipping, Amphibious vessel operators

Positive-direction: Active merchant mariners, American Bureau of Shipping, Arctic shipping operators, Container shipping lines at LA/LB, Deck department mariners, Deck department merchant mariners, Energy/space support vessels, Great Lakes shipping industry, Marine salvage companies, Merchant mariners, Merchant mariners seeking credentials, Missouri River commercial navigation interests, Missouri River navigation, Offshore energy and space launch support vessel operators, Oil and hazardous material handlers, Ports of LA/Long Beach, Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, Safe tank vessel operators, St. Lucie River recreational boaters, Tank vessel operators with good safety records, US noncitizen nationals, US noncitizen nationals seeking mariner credentials, US-flagged Jones Act vessel operators, US-flagged vessel operators, Vessel crews

Negative-direction: Amphibious vessel operators, Commercial amphibious passenger vessel operators, Foreign vessel operators, Foreign vessel operators in OCS activities, Jones Act violators, Mariners with security concerns, Negligent vessel operators, Port operators, Port operators and vessel owners, Tank vessel operators, Vessel operators engaging in negligent conduct, Vessel owners, Vessel owners who abandon, Vessel owners who abandon vessels

Oil & Gas
14 mentions across 13 clauses
+7 positive -1 negative ?6 uncertain

Deepwater port operators, EEZ operators, LNG terminal operators

Positive-direction: LNG terminal operators, Natural gas deepwater port operators, Offshore facility operators, US offshore energy operators, US offshore operators

Negative-direction: Deepwater port operators

Shipbuilding
10 mentions across 10 clauses
+8 positive ?2 uncertain

Autonomous vessel developers, Autonomous vessel industry, Autonomous vessel technology developers

Defense
7 mentions across 6 clauses
+5 positive -2 negative

Aircraft maintenance contractors, Aircraft manufacturers, Defense contractors seeking integrator roles

Positive-direction: Aircraft maintenance contractors, Aircraft manufacturers, Lockheed Martin (HC-130J manufacturer), Unmanned systems and drone manufacturers, Unmanned systems manufacturers

Negative-direction: Defense contractors seeking integrator roles, Large defense contractors seeking lead integrator roles

Research & Science
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

FFRDCs, Federally funded research and development centers, Maritime R&D contractors

State & Local Government
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+4 positive -1 negative

State and local marine agencies, State marine agencies, State maritime agencies

State maritime agencies faces effects in multiple directions

Grantmaking And Giving Services
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Coast Guard Academy foundations

100/100
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Coast Guard Maritime Security
Actor Mappings
"commandant"
→ Commandant of the Coast Guard

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology