HR7653-119

Reported

Biodefense Diplomacy Enhancement Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 23, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Biodefense Diplomacy Enhancement Act directs the Secretary of State to advance U.S. foreign policy goals on international biodefense, biosecurity, and biotechnology cooperation with allies and partners. Through the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security if delegated, and in coordination with the Under Secretary for Political Affairs and the U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO, the Secretary must pursue stronger NATO biodefense cooperation.

The NATO work includes policy development on biotechnology, biosurveillance, and biological threat countermeasures; review of NATO planning gaps; potential revisions to NATO chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear defense policy; interoperability and allied-force capabilities for resilience, detection, attribution, emergency response, and recovery after a weaponized biological attack; expanded NATO biotechnology capabilities; and high standards for biological research safety and security. The bill also directs cooperation with major non-NATO allies and other partners on biotechnology, biosecurity, export controls for dual-use biotechnology items, safety and security in biological research, and enforcement of the Biological Weapons Convention.

The Secretary must develop a NATO Biodefense Strategy and an International Biotechnology, Biosecurity, and Biodefense Cooperation Strategy. Those strategies must assess current cooperation, planning gaps, capability development, Department of State cooperation with other U.S. agencies, possible international commitments, export-control feasibility, and use of NADR programs and funds. A report containing the strategies is due within 270 days and may include a classified annex. The Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security must brief congressional committees within 90 days on significant developments.

Who Benefits and How

NATO allies benefit from focused cooperation on biodefense policy, biosurveillance, countermeasures, interoperability, and response to weaponized biological attacks. Major non-NATO allies benefit from expanded cooperation on biotechnology, biosecurity, and biodefense. Department of State arms control staff benefit from clear strategy mandates and reporting deadlines. U.S. biodefense agencies benefit from State Department coordination with allies on biological threat countermeasures and export controls. Biological research security programs benefit from diplomatic promotion of high safety and security standards. Congressional foreign affairs committees benefit from a 90-day briefing and a 270-day strategy report.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secretary of State must direct and report on expanded biodefense diplomacy. The Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security must coordinate NATO and partner-country work, brief Congress within 90 days, and help submit the 270-day report. NATO policy staff must evaluate planning gaps and possible revisions to CBRN defense policy. Biotechnology export-control officials must assess dual-use items and coordination beyond existing regimes such as Wassenaar and the Australia Group. Department of State NADR program managers must evaluate how nonproliferation and related funds could support biosecurity cooperation. Countries with weak biological research safeguards may face pressure to raise safety and security standards.

Key Provisions

  • Directs the Secretary of State to advance international biodefense, biosecurity, and biotechnology cooperation.
  • Requires enhanced NATO cooperation on policy, biosurveillance, countermeasures, interoperability, and biological attack response.
  • Directs cooperation with major non-NATO allies and partners on biotechnology, biosecurity, export controls, and Biological Weapons Convention enforcement.
  • Requires a NATO Biodefense Strategy assessing cooperation, planning gaps, recommendations, and interagency coordination.
  • Requires an International Biotechnology, Biosecurity, and Biodefense Cooperation Strategy.
  • Requires review of dual-use biotechnology export controls and potential use of NADR programs and funds.
  • Requires a 270-day strategy report and a 90-day congressional briefing.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Secretary of State to strengthen international biodefense, biosecurity, and biotechnology cooperation with NATO allies, major non-NATO allies, and other partners; develop a NATO Biodefense Strategy and an International Biotechnology, Biosecurity, and Biodefense Cooperation Strategy; coordinate export-control and Biological Weapons Convention work; and brief and report to Congress.

Key Policy Areas

Biodefense, Foreign Policy, Export Controls

Primary Purpose

Requires the Secretary of State to strengthen international biodefense, biosecurity, and biotechnology cooperation with NATO allies, major non-NATO allies, and other partners; develop a NATO Biodefense Strategy and an International Biotechnology, Biosecurity, and Biodefense Cooperation Strategy; coordinate export-control and Biological Weapons Convention work; and brief and report to Congress.

Policy Domains

Biodefense Foreign Policy Export Controls

Bill provisions

Identified Gains
  • NATO allies
  • Major non-NATO allies
  • Department of State arms control staff
  • United States biodefense agencies
  • Biological research security programs
  • Congressional foreign affairs committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
NATO allies:
Major non-NATO allies:
United States biodefense agencies:
Biological research security programs:
Department of State arms control staff:
Congressional foreign affairs committees:
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of State staff
  • Under Secretary for Arms Control staff
  • NATO policy staff
  • Biotechnology export-control officials
  • Department of State NADR program managers
  • Countries with weak biological research safeguards
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
NATO policy staff:
Secretary of State staff:
Biotechnology export-control officials:
Under Secretary for Arms Control staff:
Department of State NADR program managers:
Countries with weak biological research safeguards:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 26, 2026

Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 46 …

Mar 26, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 23, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Feb 23, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 23, 2026

Mr. Self (for himself and Mr. Keating) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

Biotechnology export-control officials, Congressional foreign affairs committees, Department of State arms control staff

Positive-direction: Congressional foreign affairs committees

Negative-direction: Biotechnology export-control officials, Department of State arms control staff

Foreign Policy
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Major non-NATO allies, NATO allies

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Biological research security programs

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Biodefense Foreign Policy Export Controls
Actor Mappings
"secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"under_secretary"
→ Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security
"nato_representative"
→ United States Permanent Representative to NATO

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology