HR7643-119

In Committee

Veteran Technology Employment Success Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 23, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Veteran Technology Employment Success Act requires VA to make VET-TEC program outcome information public and defines the reported employment rate. The denominator is every covered individual who completed a qualifying high-technology program during the year. The numerator is the subset employed 180 days after completion.

VA may not count as a successful placement a graduate employed by the same organization that provided the education, or by that organization's parent or affiliate, as an instructor for a substantially similar program. To the maximum extent practicable, VA must separately report full-time employment, part-time employment, and self-employment rates.

VA must also continuously solicit, collect, and analyze feedback from participating covered individuals and from the GI Bill School Feedback Tool. The agency must use that feedback to evaluate and improve implementation.

The bill changes measurement, publication, and feedback requirements. It does not alter training-benefit amounts, guarantee employment, or automatically disqualify a provider based on a particular rate.

Who Benefits and How

Veterans choosing technology programs gain a public, consistently calculated 180-day employment measure and more detail about job type. Prospective students can distinguish genuine outside employment from a provider hiring its own graduates to teach similar courses. VA program managers and congressional overseers gain cleaner performance evidence. Providers producing durable outside placements gain reputational value, and participant feedback can improve program design.

Who Bears the Burden and How

VA must track completers for 180 days, classify employment status, identify provider affiliates, publish rates, collect feedback, and analyze it continuously. Training providers must support accurate outcome records and face scrutiny when graduates are unemployed or work only as affiliated instructors. Participants may receive additional follow-up requests. Providers relying on instructional hires lose those placements from the numerator.

Key Provisions

  • Requires public availability of VET-TEC employment outcomes.
  • Establishes a denominator based on annual program completers.
  • Defines successful employment at 180 days after completion.
  • Excludes substantially similar instructional jobs with the provider or affiliate.
  • Requires separate job-type rates when practicable.
  • Requires ongoing participant-feedback collection.
  • Uses the GI Bill School Feedback Tool as a source.
  • Directs VA to use feedback to improve implementation.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Standardizes and publicly discloses the VET-TEC high-technology program's 180-day employment rate, excludes provider-affiliated instructional placements from successful outcomes, adds available full-time, part-time, and self-employment rates, and requires ongoing participant-feedback collection for program improvement.

Key Policy Areas

Veterans Employment Training, VET-TEC Program Oversight, Education Outcome Reporting, GI Bill Feedback, Technology Workforce Development

Primary Purpose

Standardizes and publicly discloses the VET-TEC high-technology program's 180-day employment rate, excludes provider-affiliated instructional placements from successful outcomes, adds available full-time, part-time, and self-employment rates, and requires ongoing participant-feedback collection for program improvement.

Policy Domains

Veterans Employment Training VET-TEC Program Oversight Education Outcome Reporting GI Bill Feedback Technology Workforce Development

Section 2 VET-TEC employment-rate and feedback requirements

Identified Gains
  • Veterans comparing VET-TEC providers
  • Prospective students reviewing employment rates
  • VA officials evaluating training performance
  • Congressional veterans-program overseers
  • Providers producing independent job placements
  • Participants submitting program feedback
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Veterans comparing VET-TEC providers:
Congressional veterans-program overseers:
Participants submitting program feedback:
VA officials evaluating training performance:
Providers producing independent job placements:
Prospective students reviewing employment rates:
Identified Costs
  • VA employment-outcome reporting staff
  • VET-TEC providers supplying placement records
  • Providers relying on affiliated instructor hires
  • VA analysts reviewing participant feedback
  • Participants receiving employment follow-up
  • Provider affiliates subject to placement checks
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
VA employment-outcome reporting staff:
VA analysts reviewing participant feedback:
Participants receiving employment follow-up:
VET-TEC providers supplying placement records:
Provider affiliates subject to placement checks:
Providers relying on affiliated instructor hires:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 16, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.

Feb 23, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Feb 23, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 23, 2026

Mr. Walkinshaw (for himself and Mr. McGarvey) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Education
5 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -3 negative

Prospective students reviewing employment rates, Provider affiliates subject to placement checks, Providers producing independent job placements

Positive-direction: Prospective students reviewing employment rates, Providers producing independent job placements

Negative-direction: Provider affiliates subject to placement checks, Providers relying on affiliated instructor hires, VET-TEC providers supplying placement records

Government
4 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -2 negative

Congressional veterans-program overseers, VA analysts reviewing participant feedback, VA employment-outcome reporting staff

Positive-direction: Congressional veterans-program overseers, VA officials evaluating training performance

Negative-direction: VA analysts reviewing participant feedback, VA employment-outcome reporting staff

Veterans
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive ~1 mixed

Participants receiving employment follow-up, Participants submitting program feedback, Veterans comparing VET-TEC providers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Veterans Employment Training VET-TEC Program Oversight Education Outcome Reporting GI Bill Feedback Technology Workforce Development
Actor Mappings
"provider"
→ VET-TEC high-technology education provider
"participant"
→ Covered individual completing a VET-TEC program
"public_user"
→ Prospective veteran student
"administrator"
→ Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Note: {'scope_ids': ['vet_tec_outcome_measurement'], 'description': 'The bill standardizes reporting and feedback but does not guarantee a job, change VET-TEC benefit amounts, require every employment-status breakdown when impracticable, or automatically sanction a provider for a low rate.'}

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"180-day employment rate" §employment_rate

The percentage of annual completers employed 180 days after completion, excluding specified provider-affiliated instructional placements.

"program feedback" §feedback_source

Ongoing participant input and information from the GI Bill School Feedback Tool used to evaluate implementation.

"excluded instructional placement" §excluded_placement

Employment by the education provider or its parent or affiliate as an instructor for a substantially similar program.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology