HR7619-119

In Committee

Keep Jobs in California Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Feb 20, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Keep Jobs in California Act of 2026 prohibits a state from imposing a tax on a nonresident individual based on the value of that person's assets when two conditions are met. First, the tax is attributable to asset value during a period before the state law creating the tax was enacted. Second, the individual no longer resides in that state on the state law's enactment date.

The bill does not prohibit a state from taxing current residents, from imposing a prospective asset-value tax after enactment, or from collecting another kind of tax not covered by the text. It creates a narrow federal restriction on retroactive state asset taxation of people who have already become nonresidents.

Who Benefits and How

Former state residents and other nonresident individuals with assets potentially covered by a retroactive state wealth or asset-value tax benefit because the state cannot reach pre-enactment periods after they have left. Their financial advisers and tax preparers gain a clearer federal rule for this narrow fact pattern. The bill may reduce uncertainty for individuals considering interstate relocation before a new state asset-tax law is enacted.

Who Bears the Burden and How

States considering retroactive asset-value taxes lose authority to collect that tax from people who are nonresidents on enactment day. State revenue accounts bear any resulting reduction in expected collections, and state tax administrators must screen residency dates and pre-enactment valuation periods before assessing a covered tax. Current residents and prospective post-enactment taxation remain outside this federal restriction.

Key Provisions

  • Applies only to taxes based on the value of an individual's assets.
  • Protects individuals who are nonresidents when the state tax law is enacted.
  • Covers asset-value periods occurring before enactment of the state law.
  • Bars the state from combining those conditions into a retroactive assessment.
  • Does not bar prospective taxation after enactment.
  • Does not bar taxation of people who remain state residents on enactment day.
  • Does not create a federal appropriation, credit, deduction, or reporting program.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits states from applying a newly enacted asset-value tax retroactively to periods before enactment when the taxed individual is a nonresident on the state law's enactment date.

Key Policy Areas

Taxation, State Revenue, Interstate Mobility, Nonresident Taxation

Primary Purpose

Prohibits states from applying a newly enacted asset-value tax retroactively to periods before enactment when the taxed individual is a nonresident on the state law's enactment date.

Policy Domains

Taxation State Revenue Interstate Mobility Nonresident Taxation

Section 2 prohibition on retroactive state asset tax

Identified Gains
  • Former residents facing retroactive asset taxes
  • Nonresident asset owners
  • Tax advisers serving interstate movers
  • Individuals considering interstate relocation
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Nonresident asset owners:
Tax advisers serving interstate movers:
Individuals considering interstate relocation:
Former residents facing retroactive asset taxes:
Identified Costs
  • States planning retroactive asset taxes
  • State asset-tax revenue accounts
  • State residency-review staff
  • State asset-valuation auditors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State residency-review staff:
State asset-valuation auditors:
State asset-tax revenue accounts:
States planning retroactive asset taxes:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 20, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 20, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 20, 2026

Mr. Kiley of California introduced the following bill; which was …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
-3 negative

State asset-tax revenue accounts, State residency-review staff, States planning retroactive asset taxes

Taxation
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Former residents facing retroactive asset taxes, Nonresident asset owners

Accountants
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Tax advisers serving interstate movers

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Taxation State Revenue Interstate Mobility Nonresident Taxation
Actor Mappings
"state"
→ State imposing an asset-value tax
"nonresident"
→ Individual not residing in the taxing state on the state law's enactment date

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"covered retroactive asset tax" §2

A state tax based on an individual's asset value for a pre-enactment period when the individual is a nonresident on the state law's enactment date.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology