HR7601-119

In Committee

No Immunity for Glyphosate Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 20, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The No Immunity for Glyphosate Act has two main effects. First, it prohibits federal funds from being used to implement, administer, or enforce the February 18, 2026 executive order titled Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides. Second, it creates an express federal path for injured people, estates, survivors, or legal representatives to sue covered entities that manufacture, distribute, formulate, supply, or sell elemental phosphorus or glyphosate-based herbicides. Federal district courts get jurisdiction regardless of amount in controversy or citizenship. Remedies can include compensatory damages for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and wrongful death, plus punitive damages, declaratory and injunctive relief, and attorney fees and costs. The bill says covered entities cannot use Defense Production Act immunity, federal-contractor immunity, preemption, or compliance with an executive order, regulation, contract, or authorization as a defense, and it preserves state and federal claims including pending cases.

Who Benefits and How

People injured by glyphosate-based herbicides, estates of exposed individuals, survivors pursuing wrongful-death claims, plaintiffs attorneys, and state-law tort claimants benefit from a federal cause of action, broader damages, attorney-fee recovery, and removal of federal immunity defenses.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Glyphosate manufacturers, elemental phosphorus suppliers, herbicide distributors, and covered contractors must defend federal and state injury suits without relying on Defense Production Act, federal-contractor, preemption, or federal-authorization immunity defenses. Federal agencies implementing the executive order must stop using appropriated funds for that work, and federal district courts must hear covered exposure claims regardless of amount in controversy or party citizenship.

Key Provisions

  • Bars federal funds from implementing, administering, or enforcing the February 18, 2026 executive order on elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
  • Creates a federal civil action for physical injury, illness, disease, or death caused by glyphosate-based herbicide or elemental phosphorus exposure.
  • Authorizes compensatory damages, punitive damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, and costs in covered civil actions.
  • Prohibits covered entities from asserting Defense Production Act, federal-contractor, preemption, or federal-authorization immunity defenses.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bars federal funds from implementing a February 18, 2026 executive order on elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides, creates a federal civil action for people injured by glyphosate or elemental phosphorus exposure, and strips Defense Production Act, federal-contractor, and preemption immunity defenses from covered manufacturers, distributors, formulators, suppliers, and sellers.

Key Policy Areas

Agriculture, Torts, Federal Contracts, Public Health

Primary Purpose

Bars federal funds from implementing a February 18, 2026 executive order on elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides, creates a federal civil action for people injured by glyphosate or elemental phosphorus exposure, and strips Defense Production Act, federal-contractor, and preemption immunity defenses from covered manufacturers, distributors, formulators, suppliers, and sellers.

Policy Domains

Agriculture Torts Federal Contracts Public Health

Bill-wide scope

Identified Gains
  • Glyphosate exposure victims
  • Survivors pursuing wrongful-death claims
  • Plaintiffs attorneys
  • State-law tort claimants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Plaintiffs attorneys: ,
State-law tort claimants: ,
Glyphosate exposure victims: ,
Survivors pursuing wrongful-death claims: ,
Identified Costs
  • Glyphosate manufacturers
  • Elemental phosphorus suppliers
  • Herbicide distributors
  • Covered contractors
  • Federal district courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Covered contractors: ,
Herbicide distributors: ,
Federal district courts: ,
Glyphosate manufacturers: ,
Elemental phosphorus suppliers: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 20, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 20, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 20, 2026

Mr. Massie (for himself, Ms. Pingree, Ms. Boebert, Ms. Mace, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Healthcare
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+3 positive

Glyphosate exposure victims, Survivors pursuing wrongful-death claims

Agriculture
3 mentions across 2 clauses
-3 negative

Glyphosate manufacturers, Herbicide distributors

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Plaintiffs attorneys

Chemicals
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Elemental phosphorus suppliers

Courts
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal district courts

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal agencies implementing the glyphosate order

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Taxpayers

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture Torts Federal Contracts Public Health
Actor Mappings
"DPA"
→ Defense Production Act
"primary_beneficiaries"
→ Glyphosate exposure victims, Survivors pursuing wrongful-death claims, Plaintiffs attorneys, State-law tort claimants
"primary_burden_bearers"
→ Glyphosate manufacturers, Elemental phosphorus suppliers, Herbicide distributors, Covered contractors, Federal district courts

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology