To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny deduction for outsourcing payments.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny deduction for outsourcing payments., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting workers, employers, and labor regulators. The main policy domain is Labor, Trade, Foreign Policy.
Who Benefits and How
workers, employers, and labor regulators may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.
Who Bears the Burden and How
federal implementing agencies, workers, employers, and labor regulators may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.
Key Provisions
- Section H6868CFF5FCB24AB6AF7E72F596032F03: 1. Denial of income tax deduction on outsourcing payments Part IX of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the...
- Section H3A7498089C67449AB52B8A373E306630: 280I. Outsourcing payments No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for any outsourcing payment. For purposes of this section— The term outsourcing...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny deduction for outsourcing payments., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting workers, employers, and labor regulators.
Key Policy Areas
Labor, Trade, Foreign Policy
Primary Purpose
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny deduction for outsourcing payments., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting workers, employers, and labor regulators.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- workers, employers, and labor regulators
Identified Costs
- federal implementing agencies
- workers, employers, and labor regulators
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_secretary"
- → The Secretary identified in the operative section
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology