AIMS Act of 2025
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill, AIMS Act of 2025, changes federal law or congressional policy affecting technology companies and users of digital services. The main policy domain is Technology, Government Operations, Healthcare.
Who Benefits and How
technology companies and users of digital services may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.
Who Bears the Burden and How
federal implementing agencies, technology companies and users of digital services may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.
Key Provisions
- Section HC78B5C0F62B244DB95398D4D08FDE66B: 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Achieving Interoperability of Medical Systems Act of 2025 or the AIMS Act of 2025.
- Section H93DB237052E54E778B23577AFFDDFFB2: 2. Findings Congress finds the following: Section 1635 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note)...
- Section HFC6AF6C50B3A4F4DBABD9EF19BD2EFB8: 3. Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs interoperability of medical images and related data The Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
This bill, AIMS Act of 2025, changes federal law or congressional policy affecting technology companies and users of digital services.
Key Policy Areas
Technology, Government Operations, Healthcare
Primary Purpose
This bill, AIMS Act of 2025, changes federal law or congressional policy affecting technology companies and users of digital services.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- technology companies and users of digital services
Identified Costs
- federal implementing agencies
- technology companies and users of digital services
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition …
Introduced in House
Mr. Schweikert introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "secretary_of_defense"
- → Secretary of Defense
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology