HR7553-119

In Committee

Aviation Innovation and Global Competitiveness Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 12, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill directs the FAA to make type certification more transparent and predictable for aircraft, engines, propellers, powered-lift, and advanced air mobility technologies. Within 180 days, FAA must publish a plan to improve the issue-paper process, use industry consensus standards where appropriate, stabilize recurring policy, and consider performance-based standards. Within 270 days, FAA must amend Order 8110.112A and related documents to set expected timelines for certification milestones, issue papers, special-condition rulemaking, exemption petitions, means-of-compliance proposals, and applicant responses, while excluding complex unsafe-condition issues. FAA must consult with manufacturers, advanced air mobility stakeholders, airport and vertiport infrastructure providers, aviation safety bargaining representatives, and others. It must report annually on performance against timelines and policy stability. FAA also must amend issue-paper criteria within 180 days and publish delegation guidance within 90 days covering applicant eligibility, routine versus safety-critical findings, management review when delegation is not used, and how delegation affects safety, predictability, and U.S. leadership. The timelines create no new legal rights and are not judicially reviewable.

Who Benefits and How

Aircraft manufacturers, advanced air mobility developers, aircraft engine manufacturers, propeller manufacturers, airport and vertiport infrastructure providers, and FAA applicants benefit from clearer certification timelines, issue-paper criteria, consensus-standard use, and delegation guidance.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The FAA, Aircraft Certification Service, aviation safety inspectors, aviation safety engineers, and congressional transportation committees must write guidance, consult stakeholders, track timelines, report performance, maintain safety discretion, and manage delegation decisions.

Key Provisions

  • Requires FAA within 180 days to publish a public plan improving issue papers, consensus-standard use, stable policy, and performance-based standards.
  • Requires FAA within 270 days to amend Order 8110.112A and set expected timelines for certification milestones and responses.
  • Requires FAA issue-paper criteria and annual updates that convert stable recurring issue papers into policy or standards.
  • Requires FAA delegation guidance within 90 days for applicant eligibility, routine findings, safety-critical findings, and management review.
  • Limits litigation by stating the expected timelines create no new legal right and are not subject to judicial review.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires FAA public plans, order amendments, timelines, issue-paper criteria, delegation guidance, and annual reporting to make aircraft type certification more predictable for novel aviation technologies without creating judicially enforceable timing rights.

Key Policy Areas

Aviation, Technology, Transportation, Regulatory Process

Primary Purpose

Requires FAA public plans, order amendments, timelines, issue-paper criteria, delegation guidance, and annual reporting to make aircraft type certification more predictable for novel aviation technologies without creating judicially enforceable timing rights.

Policy Domains

Aviation Technology Transportation Regulatory Process

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Aircraft manufacturers
  • Advanced air mobility developers
  • Aircraft engine manufacturers
  • Airport infrastructure providers
  • FAA applicants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FAA applicants: , , ,
Aircraft manufacturers: , , ,
Aircraft engine manufacturers: , , ,
Advanced air mobility developers: , , ,
Airport infrastructure providers: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Aviation Administration
  • Aircraft Certification Service
  • Aviation safety inspectors
  • Aviation safety engineers
  • Congressional transportation committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Aviation safety engineers: , , ,
Aviation safety inspectors: , , ,
Aircraft Certification Service: , , ,
Federal Aviation Administration: , , ,
Congressional transportation committees: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 13, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Feb 12, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Feb 12, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 12, 2026

Mr. Nehls (for himself, Mr. Carson, Mr. Obernolte, and Mr. …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Transportation
8 mentions across 4 clauses
+7 positive -1 negative

Advanced air mobility developers, Aircraft engine manufacturers, Aircraft manufacturers

FAA applicants faces effects in multiple directions

Government
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Federal courts

Federal Aviation Administration faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Federal courts

Negative-direction: Aircraft Certification Service

Labor
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Aviation safety engineers, Aviation safety inspectors

4/7
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Aviation Technology Transportation Regulatory Process
Actor Mappings
"FAA"
→ Federal Aviation Administration

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology