To improve retrospective reviews of Federal regulations, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedAdditional sponsors: Mr. Crane and Ms. Mace
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …
Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Summary
What This Bill Does
Directs OMB to issue guidance on using AI and algorithmic tools for reviewing existing regulations. Requires machine-readable format for regulations and OMB report on progress.
Who Benefits and How
- Regulated entities may see outdated or redundant regulations identified faster
- Federal agencies gain tools to find ineffective regulations
- Public benefits from regulations in accessible machine-readable format
Who Bears the Burden and How
- OMB and OIRA must develop guidance and report on progress
- Federal agencies must train personnel and adopt new review technologies
- GPO and National Archives work on machine-readable CFR
Key Provisions
- Report on machine-readable regulations within 180 days
- Guidance on AI for regulatory review within 18 months
- Identifies obsolete, redundant, or contradictory regulations
- Includes training requirements for agency personnel
Evidence Chain:
This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
Primary Purpose
Requires agencies to use AI and technology tools for retrospective regulatory review
Policy Domains
Legislative Strategy
"Modernize regulatory review through AI and technology adoption"
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_director"
- → OMB Director
- "the_administrator"
- → OIRA Administrator
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology