HR7525-119

In Committee

Counter Drone State and Local Defender Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 12, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill gives the FAA Administrator counter-UAS authority and creates pilot programs for non-federal law enforcement. The FAA may detect, identify, monitor, track, seize, control, confiscate, disrupt, disable, damage, or destroy unmanned aircraft systems that pose credible threats to the national airspace system, and may test counter-UAS systems. Certain aircraft-sabotage, computer-crime, communications-interception, and pen-register laws do not apply to authorized activities, but the FAA must protect First and Fourth Amendment interests, limit communications interception to what is necessary, promptly dispose of records unless needed for investigations or other authorized purposes, and share only non-communications threat information as needed. The bill also requires a 3-year pilot designating up to 1,000 law enforcement agencies in the first year, up to 3,000 additional agencies the next year, and no more than 4,000 total, plus a separate FIFA World Cup pilot of up to 40 agencies near host cities.

Who Benefits and How

The FAA, state law enforcement agencies, local law enforcement agencies, Tribal law enforcement agencies, territorial law enforcement agencies, airport operators, World Cup host cities, and communities around covered facilities benefit from authority to mitigate credible drone threats. Approved counter-UAS technology providers may benefit from FAA-approved equipment demand.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The FAA must approve systems, establish application processes within 60 days, consult FCC and NTIA, set training criteria, oversee pilots, report to Congress every 6 months, handle privacy complaints, and issue permanent policies after the pilot. Participating law enforcement agencies must use approved equipment, adopt written privacy policies, train personnel, report uses within 180 days, and follow FAA guidance. Drone operators near covered assets may have drones tracked, seized, disrupted, disabled, damaged, or destroyed.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes FAA counter-UAS actions to detect or mitigate credible unmanned-aircraft threats to the national airspace system.
  • Exempts authorized counter-UAS activities from specified aircraft, computer-crime, wiretap, and pen-register restrictions while imposing privacy and records limits.
  • Creates a 3-year pilot for up to 4,000 state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to use FAA-approved counter-UAS systems.
  • Requires FAA consultation with FCC and NTIA to approve systems and training criteria.
  • Requires written policies, training, use reports, and 6-month congressional updates on law enforcement use and privacy or civil-liberties complaints.
  • Creates a separate 2026 FIFA World Cup counter-UAS pilot for up to 40 agencies around host cities.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates FAA counter-drone authorities and pilot programs allowing approved state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to detect, seize, disrupt, or disable threatening unmanned aircraft under FAA oversight and privacy rules.

Key Policy Areas

Aviation, Law Enforcement, Technology, Civil Rights

Primary Purpose

Creates FAA counter-drone authorities and pilot programs allowing approved state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to detect, seize, disrupt, or disable threatening unmanned aircraft under FAA oversight and privacy rules.

Policy Domains

Aviation Law Enforcement Technology Civil Rights

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal Aviation Administration
  • State law enforcement agencies
  • Local law enforcement agencies
  • Tribal law enforcement agencies
  • World Cup host city law enforcement agencies
  • Airport operators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Airport operators: , ,
Local law enforcement agencies: , ,
State law enforcement agencies: , ,
Federal Aviation Administration: , ,
Tribal law enforcement agencies: , ,
World Cup host city law enforcement agencies: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Aviation Administration
  • Participating law enforcement agencies
  • Drone operators near covered facilities
  • Counter-UAS technology vendors
  • Civil liberties complainants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Civil liberties complainants: , ,
Counter-UAS technology vendors: , ,
Federal Aviation Administration: , ,
Participating law enforcement agencies: , ,
Drone operators near covered facilities: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 13, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Feb 12, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …

Feb 12, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 12, 2026

Mr. Burlison introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive

Local law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies, Territorial law enforcement agencies

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Federal Aviation Administration

Technology
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Counter-UAS technology vendors, Drone operators near covered facilities, Unmanned aircraft operators

Positive-direction: Counter-UAS technology vendors

Negative-direction: Drone operators near covered facilities, Unmanned aircraft operators

Tribal Nations
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Tribal law enforcement agencies

Advocacy Groups
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Civil liberties complainants

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Aviation Law Enforcement Technology Civil Rights
Actor Mappings
"fcc_chairman"
→ Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission
"administrator"
→ Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
"ntia_assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology