Counter Drone State and Local Defender Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill gives the FAA Administrator counter-UAS authority and creates pilot programs for non-federal law enforcement. The FAA may detect, identify, monitor, track, seize, control, confiscate, disrupt, disable, damage, or destroy unmanned aircraft systems that pose credible threats to the national airspace system, and may test counter-UAS systems. Certain aircraft-sabotage, computer-crime, communications-interception, and pen-register laws do not apply to authorized activities, but the FAA must protect First and Fourth Amendment interests, limit communications interception to what is necessary, promptly dispose of records unless needed for investigations or other authorized purposes, and share only non-communications threat information as needed. The bill also requires a 3-year pilot designating up to 1,000 law enforcement agencies in the first year, up to 3,000 additional agencies the next year, and no more than 4,000 total, plus a separate FIFA World Cup pilot of up to 40 agencies near host cities.
Who Benefits and How
The FAA, state law enforcement agencies, local law enforcement agencies, Tribal law enforcement agencies, territorial law enforcement agencies, airport operators, World Cup host cities, and communities around covered facilities benefit from authority to mitigate credible drone threats. Approved counter-UAS technology providers may benefit from FAA-approved equipment demand.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The FAA must approve systems, establish application processes within 60 days, consult FCC and NTIA, set training criteria, oversee pilots, report to Congress every 6 months, handle privacy complaints, and issue permanent policies after the pilot. Participating law enforcement agencies must use approved equipment, adopt written privacy policies, train personnel, report uses within 180 days, and follow FAA guidance. Drone operators near covered assets may have drones tracked, seized, disrupted, disabled, damaged, or destroyed.
Key Provisions
- Authorizes FAA counter-UAS actions to detect or mitigate credible unmanned-aircraft threats to the national airspace system.
- Exempts authorized counter-UAS activities from specified aircraft, computer-crime, wiretap, and pen-register restrictions while imposing privacy and records limits.
- Creates a 3-year pilot for up to 4,000 state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to use FAA-approved counter-UAS systems.
- Requires FAA consultation with FCC and NTIA to approve systems and training criteria.
- Requires written policies, training, use reports, and 6-month congressional updates on law enforcement use and privacy or civil-liberties complaints.
- Creates a separate 2026 FIFA World Cup counter-UAS pilot for up to 40 agencies around host cities.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates FAA counter-drone authorities and pilot programs allowing approved state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to detect, seize, disrupt, or disable threatening unmanned aircraft under FAA oversight and privacy rules.
Key Policy Areas
Aviation, Law Enforcement, Technology, Civil Rights
Primary Purpose
Creates FAA counter-drone authorities and pilot programs allowing approved state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to detect, seize, disrupt, or disable threatening unmanned aircraft under FAA oversight and privacy rules.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Federal Aviation Administration
- State law enforcement agencies
- Local law enforcement agencies
- Tribal law enforcement agencies
- World Cup host city law enforcement agencies
- Airport operators
Identified Costs
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Participating law enforcement agencies
- Drone operators near covered facilities
- Counter-UAS technology vendors
- Civil liberties complainants
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …
Introduced in House
Mr. Burlison introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Local law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies, Territorial law enforcement agencies
Counter-UAS technology vendors, Drone operators near covered facilities, Unmanned aircraft operators
Positive-direction: Counter-UAS technology vendors
Negative-direction: Drone operators near covered facilities, Unmanned aircraft operators
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "fcc_chairman"
- → Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission
- "administrator"
- → Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
- "ntia_assistant_secretary"
- → Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology