HR7492-119

In Committee

Michigan-Canada Partnership Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 11, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill makes congressional findings that the Gordie Howe International Bridge connecting Detroit and Windsor is critical transportation, trade, and national security infrastructure, supports automotive, manufacturing, agricultural, and energy supply chains, and is being built under valid approvals and a Michigan-Canada agreement financed by Canada without direct cost to Michigan taxpayers. It then prohibits federal officials, including the President, from impeding the opening or attempting closure of the bridge or port of entry unless approved by Congress or requested by Michigan's Governor. Federal agencies must ensure timely opening and continuous operation, and Michigan or affected local governments can sue in federal district court to compel compliance.

Who Benefits and How

Michigan manufacturers, automotive supply chains, agricultural exporters, energy producers, cross-border freight carriers, Canada trade partners, Detroit-Windsor travelers, and Michigan taxpayers benefit from protection against federal interference with a bridge intended to increase capacity and resilience at the busiest commercial land border crossing in North America. State and local governments benefit from a statutory enforcement right if federal inaction or action threatens opening or operation.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The President, CBP, federal border agencies, transportation officials, and other federal officials must avoid impeding, delaying, conditioning, or interfering with the bridge or port of entry and must take necessary steps for staffing and operation. Federal agencies must follow relevant staffing and operational models, including the CBP Workforce Staffing Model. Federal courts may be asked to compel compliance by Michigan or affected local governments.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits federal officials from impeding the opening or attempting closure of the Gordie Howe International Bridge or port of entry.
  • Requires federal agencies to ensure timely opening and continuous operation under relevant staffing and operational models.
  • Allows Congress or Michigan's Governor to approve or request exceptions to the prohibition.
  • Creates a federal court enforcement path for Michigan and affected local governments.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Protects the Gordie Howe International Bridge and associated port of entry by barring federal officials from impeding, delaying, conditioning, closing, or failing to support timely opening and continuous operation unless Congress approves or Michigan's Governor requests it.

Key Policy Areas

transportation, trade, border_security

Primary Purpose

Protects the Gordie Howe International Bridge and associated port of entry by barring federal officials from impeding, delaying, conditioning, closing, or failing to support timely opening and continuous operation unless Congress approves or Michigan's Governor requests it.

Policy Domains

transportation trade border_security

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Michigan manufacturers
  • Automotive supply chains
  • Agricultural exporters
  • Energy producers
  • Cross-border freight carriers
  • Michigan taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Energy producers: ,
Michigan taxpayers: ,
Agricultural exporters: ,
Michigan manufacturers: ,
Automotive supply chains: ,
Cross-border freight carriers: ,
Identified Costs
  • President
  • CBP
  • Federal border agencies
  • Transportation officials
  • Federal courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
CBP: ,
President: ,
Federal courts: ,
Federal border agencies: ,
Transportation officials: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 12, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

Feb 12, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.

Feb 11, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition …

Feb 11, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 11, 2026

Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Ms. Stevens, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Thanedar, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Manufacturing
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Michigan manufacturers

Transportation
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Cross-border freight carriers

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

CBP, Federal officials

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Michigan local governments

Foreign Entities
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Canada trade partners

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Michigan taxpayers

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
transportation trade border_security
Actor Mappings
"agencies"
→ ['CBP', 'Federal border agencies', 'Federal courts']
"beneficiaries"
→ ['Michigan manufacturers', 'Cross-border freight carriers', 'Michigan taxpayers']

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology