HR7457-119

In Committee

Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Feb 10, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill does not appropriate money or directly impose sanctions, but it creates a detailed congressional record and oversight demand around religious persecution in Nigeria. It cites attacks by Boko Haram, ISWAP, Fulani-ethnic militias, blasphemy-law prosecutions, displacement, and CPC recommendations. It then states that the United States should use diplomatic, humanitarian, economic, security, and sanctions tools, and requires annual State Department reports until Nigeria is no longer designated as a Country of Particular Concern.

Who Benefits and How

Nigerian Christian communities, Nigerian religious minorities, internally displaced persons, and faith-based humanitarian partners benefit from congressional pressure for protection, humanitarian delivery, safe returns, and blasphemy-law reform. USCIRF and congressional foreign affairs committees benefit from a formal reporting channel that forces the State Department to document Nigeria's compliance, sanctions choices, security assistance risks, humanitarian co-investments, and executive actions. The measure also gives advocates concrete names and mechanisms, including Global Magnitsky sanctions, visa bans, asset freezes, and FTO review.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of State must submit a comprehensive report within 90 days and annually thereafter, covering Nigeria's compliance with religious-freedom law, sanctioned or sanction-considered entities, humanitarian assistance, security assistance risks, blasphemy-law enforcement, conditions for displaced persons, and recommendations. The Government of Nigeria, Fulani-ethnic militias, MACBAN, Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, and named Nigerian officials face heightened diplomatic, sanctions, and foreign-assistance scrutiny. U.S. security-assistance programs must be evaluated for whether they enable or worsen persecution.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes findings on religious persecution, displacement, blasphemy laws, and extremist violence in Nigeria.
  • Directs U.S. policy toward CPC designation, targeted sanctions, humanitarian assistance, and possible FTO review.
  • Requires annual State Department reports to House and Senate foreign affairs and appropriations committees.
  • Requires reporting on sanctions, security assistance risks, Nigerian compliance, displaced persons, and blasphemy-law repeal.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Sets a congressional framework for pressuring Nigeria over religious persecution by endorsing CPC designation, targeted sanctions, possible FTO review of Fulani-ethnic militias, humanitarian assistance through trusted partners, and recurring State Department reports.

Key Policy Areas

foreign_policy, human_rights, sanctions, oversight

Primary Purpose

Sets a congressional framework for pressuring Nigeria over religious persecution by endorsing CPC designation, targeted sanctions, possible FTO review of Fulani-ethnic militias, humanitarian assistance through trusted partners, and recurring State Department reports.

Policy Domains

foreign_policy human_rights sanctions oversight

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Nigerian Christian communities
  • Nigerian religious freedom advocates
  • Faith-based humanitarian organizations
  • Internally displaced families
  • USCIRF Commission
  • Congressional foreign affairs committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
USCIRF Commission: , ,
Internally displaced families: , ,
Nigerian Christian communities: , ,
Nigerian religious freedom advocates: , ,
Faith-based humanitarian organizations: , ,
Congressional foreign affairs committees: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of State
  • Department of the Treasury
  • Government of Nigeria security agencies
  • Fulani militia organizations
  • U.S. security assistance programs
  • Congressional appropriations committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Department of State: , ,
Department of the Treasury: , ,
Fulani militia organizations: , ,
U.S. security assistance programs: , ,
Congressional appropriations committees: , ,
Government of Nigeria security agencies: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 10, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition …

Feb 10, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 10, 2026

Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Moore of …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

Congressional foreign affairs committees, Department of State, Department of the Treasury

Positive-direction: Congressional foreign affairs committees, USCIRF

Negative-direction: Department of State, Department of the Treasury, U.S. security assistance programs

Foreign Entities
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -3 negative

Government of Nigeria, Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria, Nigerian Christian communities

Positive-direction: Nigerian Christian communities, Nigerian religious minorities

Negative-direction: Government of Nigeria, Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Faith-based humanitarian partners

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Internally displaced persons

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
foreign_policy human_rights sanctions oversight
Actor Mappings
"agencies"
→ ['Department of State', 'Department of the Treasury', 'USCIRF Commission']
"beneficiaries"
→ ['Nigerian Christian communities', 'Faith-based humanitarian organizations', 'Internally displaced families']
"foreign_targets"
→ ['Government of Nigeria security agencies', 'Fulani militia organizations']

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"" §CPC

"" §Global Magnitsky sanctions

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology