HR7427-119

Reported

SAFE VISITS Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 9, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill adds Homeland Security Act section 210H. Within 180 days and annually afterward, DHS must send Congress a threat analysis, including potential terrorism threats, based on reports from state, local, Tribal, or territorial officials or employees about known visits by foreign nationals seeking meetings or access to nonpublic government information, facilities, programs, or systems. DHS must disseminate guidance based on the analysis. The analysis must describe high-risk targets, trends from fusion-center vetting requests, and mitigation actions. If DHS identifies a particular official, employee, information set, facility, program, or system as a high-risk target, it must conduct outreach, provide classified or unclassified information at the lowest possible level, help vet the visiting foreign national, and give specific mitigation guidance. DHS must request a debriefing within 30 days after assisted visits and annually report its outreach and vetting assistance.

Who Benefits and How

State governments, local governments, Tribal governments, territorial governments, fusion centers, and public employees benefit from DHS threat guidance, vetting support, and debriefing loops for foreign-national visits that may target sensitive people or systems. Congressional homeland security committees benefit from annual threat-analysis and outreach reports.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS must collect reports, analyze trends, produce annual congressional threat analyses, issue guidance, conduct tailored outreach, provide vetting assistance, request post-visit debriefings within 30 days, and submit annual outreach reports. State, local, Tribal, and territorial hosts may need to provide vetting request information and debrief DHS after assisted visits.

Key Provisions

  • Requires DHS within 180 days and annually thereafter to report foreign-national visit threat analyses to congressional homeland security committees.
  • Directs DHS guidance to cover high-risk SLTT government targets, fusion-center trends, and mitigation steps for officials, information, facilities, programs, or systems.
  • Requires tailored outreach, lowest-level classified or unclassified information, vetting assistance, and specific mitigation guidance for high-risk visits.
  • Requires DHS to request post-visit debriefings within 30 days and annually describe outreach and vetting assistance.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires DHS to analyze and brief state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments on threats from visiting foreign nationals seeking access to officials, information, facilities, programs, or systems, and to provide tailored vetting help for high-risk visits.

Key Policy Areas

Homeland Security, State & Local Government, National Security

Primary Purpose

Requires DHS to analyze and brief state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments on threats from visiting foreign nationals seeking access to officials, information, facilities, programs, or systems, and to provide tailored vetting help for high-risk visits.

Policy Domains

Homeland Security State & Local Government National Security

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • State governments
  • Local governments
  • Tribal governments
  • Territorial governments
  • Fusion centers
  • Congressional homeland security committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Fusion centers: ,
Local governments: ,
State governments: ,
Tribal governments: ,
Territorial governments: ,
Congressional homeland security committees: ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • State host agencies
  • Local host agencies
  • Tribal host agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Local host agencies: ,
State host agencies: ,
Tribal host agencies: ,
Department of Homeland Security: ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 24, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Jun 24, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

May 14, 2026

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

May 14, 2026

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 10, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.

Feb 9, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition …

Feb 9, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 9, 2026

Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself and Mr. Thompson …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+3 positive -1 negative

Local governments, Local host agencies, State governments

Positive-direction: Local governments, State governments, Territorial governments

Negative-direction: Local host agencies

Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Congressional homeland security committees, Department of Homeland Security

Positive-direction: Congressional homeland security committees

Negative-direction: Department of Homeland Security

Tribal Nations
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Tribal governments

Law Enforcement
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Fusion centers

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Homeland Security State & Local Government National Security
Actor Mappings
"committees"
→ House and Senate homeland security committees
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"Information" §information

Data or materials collected, possessed, or prepared by an SLTT government that are not intended for public disclosure or general use.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology