HR7423-119

In Committee

No Sanctuary Cities Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Feb 9, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill replaces 8 U.S.C. 1373 with a detailed information-sharing mandate. States and political subdivisions may not prohibit, delay, condition, penalize, or require approvals before law-enforcement, correctional, or custodial officials share immigration-status, custody-status, release-time, facility-location, transfer, or discharge information with DHS or other government entities. On DHS request for a specific individual, they must give 48-hour notice before scheduled release or immediate notice for unscheduled court-ordered release and hold the person up to 48 hours for DHS custody transfer. DHS must respond to status inquiries. The Attorney General may sue for declaratory or injunctive relief, and knowing violators may lose DOJ law-enforcement grants.

Who Benefits and How

DHS, ICE, and federal immigration-enforcement officials benefit from mandated access to custody and release information and a 48-hour transfer window. State and local officers who cooperate with immigration enforcement benefit from statutory immunity comparable to federal officers. Jurisdictions that already share information may face less competitive disadvantage for DOJ law-enforcement grants.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Sanctuary jurisdictions and state or local agencies with policies limiting immigration-status communication must repeal or stop enforcing those limits, provide release notices, maintain custody for up to 48 hours after unscheduled releases when requested, and risk DOJ litigation or law-enforcement grant ineligibility. Local officials and correctional agencies must process DHS requests and information sharing instead of relying on local approval or noncooperation policies.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits state and local policies that materially restrict immigration-status, custody-status, release, facility-location, transfer, or discharge information sharing with DHS or other government entities.
  • Requires 48-hour scheduled-release notice to DHS and immediate notice plus up to 48 hours of custody for unscheduled court-ordered releases when DHS has requested notice on a specific individual.
  • Directs DHS to answer federal, state, and local immigration-status inquiries made for lawful purposes.
  • Authorizes Attorney General civil actions and allows knowing violators to be deemed ineligible for DOJ law-enforcement grants.
  • Provides state and local law-enforcement officers immunity comparable to federal officers for covered immigration-information and custody-transfer duties.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Rewrites federal immigration-information-sharing rules to bar state and local policies that restrict communication with DHS, requires custody-release notices, authorizes Justice Department enforcement, and threatens law-enforcement grant eligibility for knowing violations.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Law Enforcement, Federal Grants

Primary Purpose

Rewrites federal immigration-information-sharing rules to bar state and local policies that restrict communication with DHS, requires custody-release notices, authorizes Justice Department enforcement, and threatens law-enforcement grant eligibility for knowing violations.

Policy Domains

Immigration Law Enforcement Federal Grants

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Immigration and Customs Enforcement
  • State law enforcement officers
  • Local law enforcement officers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Local law enforcement officers: , , ,
State law enforcement officers: , , ,
Department of Homeland Security: , , ,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Sanctuary jurisdictions
  • State correctional agencies
  • Local jail administrators
  • Political subdivisions receiving Justice Department grants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Sanctuary jurisdictions: , , ,
Local jail administrators: , , ,
State correctional agencies: , , ,
Political subdivisions receiving Justice Department grants: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 9, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 9, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 9, 2026

Mr. Carter of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+3 positive ?1 uncertain

Attorney General, Department of Homeland Security, Federal courts

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 3 clauses
-4 negative

Political subdivisions receiving Justice Department grants, Sanctuary jurisdictions, State correctional agencies

Law Enforcement
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Local jail administrators, State law enforcement officers

Positive-direction: State law enforcement officers

Negative-direction: Local jail administrators

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Law Enforcement Federal Grants
Actor Mappings
"department"
→ Department of Homeland Security
"the_attorney_general"
→ Attorney General

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"Information" §information

Lawfully obtained law-enforcement, correctional, or custodial data including immigration status, custody status, release timing, facility location, transfer, or discharge information.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology