HR7418-119

Reported

STEADFAST Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 9, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The STEADFAST Act replaces the federal presidential campaign public-financing structure with a new election-security grant structure. It creates an Election Security Program and Fund in the Internal Revenue Code and directs the Election Assistance Commission to make payments to eligible states for federal-election security activities, including voting equipment, voting-system cybersecurity, physical security for equipment storage, voting-system modernization, paper ballots, paper-ballot security features, and electronic poll book protection.

States must apply to the Election Assistance Commission, submit a spending plan, certify that they do not permit noncitizens to vote in public elections, and report publicly on how grant money is spent. States may use certified qualified vendors only, and EAC may not certify a vendor that directly provided election-administration funding to a state or local government. EAC must prioritize states using voter-verifiable paper ballots, noncitizen-registration checks such as SAVE or Social Security Number Verification Service resources, and polling-place photo identification.

The bill creates an Election Security Fund at Treasury. Individual taxpayer designations under section 6096 would be transferred to that fund, and the fund receives a matching appropriation equal to the designated amounts. EAC may use up to 5 percent of the fund for administration and must publish public information on the program within 180 days. The bill also terminates public financing for future presidential elections, nominating conventions, and candidates after enactment.

Who Benefits and How

State election offices benefit because eligible states can receive federal payments for voting equipment, cybersecurity, physical security, paper ballots, and electronic poll book protection. Election Assistance Commission staff benefit from clear authority to run the grant program and certify qualified vendors. Qualified election technology vendors benefit because states using grants must use EAC-certified vendors. Voters in states receiving grants benefit from upgraded voting systems, paper ballot protections, and cybersecurity investments. Treasury election-security fund staff benefit from a statutory account for income-tax designations. Election-integrity advocates benefit because grant priority is tied to voter-verifiable paper ballots, noncitizen checks, and photo identification.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State election offices must prepare applications, certify noncitizen-voting rules, file reports with EAC, maintain public spending reports, and follow use restrictions. Election Assistance Commission staff must operate the program, set application requirements, certify vendors within 90 days, prioritize states, publish public information, and monitor reports. Secretary of the Treasury staff must transfer taxpayer-designated amounts and administer the Election Security Fund. Presidential public-financing candidates lose access to future campaign public-financing payments. Election vendors that funded state or local election administration cannot be certified as qualified vendors for the grant program. States that spend money on litigation, judgments, or non-equipment administrator training cannot charge those costs to the grant.

Key Provisions

  • Creates an Election Assistance Commission payment program for state election-security activities.
  • Requires state applications with spending plans, noncitizen-voting certifications, and spending reports.
  • Authorizes grant uses for voting equipment, cybersecurity, physical security, voting-system modernization, paper ballots, and electronic poll books.
  • Prohibits grant spending on most election-administrator training, litigation costs, and judgments.
  • Requires Election Assistance Commission certification of qualified election vendors.
  • Establishes the Election Security Fund at Treasury and transfers income-tax designations to that fund.
  • Requires public program information on the EAC website within 180 days.
  • Terminates future presidential election public-financing programs.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Converts federal taxpayer financing for presidential campaigns into an Election Assistance Commission election-security grant program for states and territories, funds it through income-tax designations to a new Election Security Fund, sets state eligibility and reporting conditions, requires qualified voting-system vendors, and terminates future presidential public-financing payments.

Key Policy Areas

Election Administration, Federal Grants, Tax Administration

Primary Purpose

Converts federal taxpayer financing for presidential campaigns into an Election Assistance Commission election-security grant program for states and territories, funds it through income-tax designations to a new Election Security Fund, sets state eligibility and reporting conditions, requires qualified voting-system vendors, and terminates future presidential public-financing payments.

Policy Domains

Election Administration Federal Grants Tax Administration

Bill provisions

Identified Gains
  • State election offices
  • Election Assistance Commission staff
  • Qualified election technology vendors
  • Voters in grant-recipient states
  • Treasury election-security fund staff
  • Election-integrity advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State election offices: , , , ,
Election-integrity advocates: , , , ,
Voters in grant-recipient states: , , , ,
Election Assistance Commission staff: , , , ,
Qualified election technology vendors: , , , ,
Treasury election-security fund staff: , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • State election offices
  • Election Assistance Commission staff
  • Secretary of the Treasury staff
  • Presidential public-financing candidates
  • Excluded election vendors
  • States with ineligible election costs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State election offices: , , , ,
Excluded election vendors: , , , ,
Secretary of the Treasury staff: , , , ,
Election Assistance Commission staff: , , , ,
States with ineligible election costs: , , , ,
Presidential public-financing candidates: , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 14, 2026

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute …

May 14, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 9, 2026

Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition …

Feb 9, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 9, 2026

Mrs. Bice (for herself, Ms. Lee of Florida, Mr. McDowell, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
16 mentions across 6 clauses
+10 positive -6 negative

District of Columbia election office, Election Assistance Commission staff, Election Security Fund

Election Assistance Commission staff faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: District of Columbia election office, Election Security Fund, State election offices, Territorial election offices, Treasury campaign-finance staff

Negative-direction: Secretary of the Treasury staff

General Public
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Taxpayers using income-tax designations, Voters in grant-recipient states

Technology
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Excluded election vendors, Qualified election technology vendors

Positive-direction: Qualified election technology vendors

Negative-direction: Excluded election vendors

Political Campaigns
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Presidential nominating convention committees, Presidential public-financing candidates

6/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Election Administration Federal Grants Tax Administration
Actor Mappings
"dhs"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security
"treasury"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"commission"
→ Election Assistance Commission

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology