HR7399-119

In Committee

Kids Off Social Media Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 5, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Kids Off Social Media Act defines covered social media platforms as ad- or data-driven public forums for user-generated content, while excluding commerce sites, videoconferencing, encyclopedias, cloud collaboration, video games, news and entertainment services, reviews, educational systems, email, direct wireless messaging, broadband access, and VPNs. Covered platforms may not allow accounts for known children under 13, must terminate known child accounts, delete personal data while preserving a limited compliance record, and provide a 90-day portable data-copy window when feasible. Platforms may not use personal data in personalized recommendation systems for known children or teens except for limited data such as device type, language, city, child/teen status, and age, while preserving search, security, unlawful-content, spam, and chronological-follow exceptions. The bill uses Federal Trade Commission unfair-or-deceptive-practice enforcement, state attorney general suits, conflict-only preemption, stronger state protections, and CIPA updates requiring E-rate schools to certify social-media blocking policies, monitoring, technology protection measures, Federal Communications Commission rules, and public internet-safety-policy databases.

Who Benefits and How

Children under 13 benefit from account termination and data deletion rules; teens benefit from limits on algorithmic feeds based on personal data; parents and student privacy advocates gain enforcement leverage against covered platforms. The Federal Trade Commission and Federal Communications Commission gain clearer authority over platform conduct and school broadband subsidy conditions. Schools, local educational agencies, and libraries benefit from explicit carveouts for learning management systems, teacher instructional use, educational services, COPPA, FERPA, and stronger state protections.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Social media companies must identify known child users based on competent evidence, terminate child accounts, delete data, provide portable data copies, stop most personalized recommendations for known children and teens, limit age-compliance data use and retention, and face Federal Trade Commission and state attorney general enforcement. Schools and local educational agencies using E-rate support must certify social-media blocking policies, monitor supported services, operate technology protection measures, and risk subsidy loss or reimbursement if they knowingly fail to comply. The Federal Communications Commission must amend rules, administer certifications, and maintain a public internet-safety-policy database.

Key Provisions

  • Defines covered social media platforms and excludes commerce, videoconferencing, cloud collaboration, games, news, education, email, direct messaging, broadband, and VPN services.
  • Prohibits known children under 13 from creating or maintaining social media accounts and requires termination, data deletion, and portable data access after termination.
  • Restricts personalized recommendation systems for known children and teens while preserving search, safety, anti-spam, crime-prevention, and chronological-follow exceptions.
  • Authorizes Federal Trade Commission and state attorney general enforcement and preserves stronger state child and teen protections.
  • Requires E-rate schools to certify social-media blocking policies, monitoring, and technology protection measures, with Federal Communications Commission rules and a public internet-safety-policy database.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bars known children under 13 from social media accounts, limits personalized recommendations for children and teens, adds FTC and state enforcement, and conditions school broadband subsidies on blocking student social-media access.

Key Policy Areas

Technology, Education, Civil Rights

Primary Purpose

Bars known children under 13 from social media accounts, limits personalized recommendations for children and teens, adds FTC and state enforcement, and conditions school broadband subsidies on blocking student social-media access.

Policy Domains

Technology Education Civil Rights

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Children under 13
  • Teens
  • Parents
  • Student privacy advocates
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • State attorneys general
  • Local educational agencies
  • Schools
  • Libraries
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Teens: , , , , , , , ,
Parents: , , , , , , , ,
Schools: , , , , , , , ,
Libraries: , , , , , , , ,
Children under 13: , , , , , , , ,
State attorneys general: , , , , , , , ,
Federal Trade Commission: , , , , , , , ,
Student privacy advocates: , , , , , , , ,
Local educational agencies: , , , , , , , ,
Federal Communications Commission: , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Social media companies
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • State attorneys general
  • Schools
  • Local educational agencies
  • Libraries
  • Technology protection vendors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Schools: , , , , , , , ,
Libraries: , , , , , , , ,
Social media companies: , , , , , , , ,
State attorneys general: , , , , , , , ,
Federal Trade Commission: , , , , , , , ,
Local educational agencies: , , , , , , , ,
Technology protection vendors: , , , , , , , ,
Federal Communications Commission: , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 5, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Feb 5, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 5, 2026

Mrs. Luna introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

General Public
11 mentions across 6 clauses
+11 positive

Children under 13, Parents, Teens

Technology
9 mentions across 8 clauses
-6 negative ~2 mixed ?1 uncertain

Recommendation system vendors, Social media platforms

Education
7 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative ~1 mixed

Educational technology providers, Libraries, Local educational agencies

Positive-direction: Educational technology providers

Negative-direction: Libraries, Local educational agencies, Schools

Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-3 negative ?1 uncertain

FTC, Federal courts

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -1 negative

State attorneys general, State governments

State attorneys general faces effects in multiple directions

Telecommunications
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

FCC

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Platform users

9/13
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology Education Civil Rights
Actor Mappings
"fcc"
→ Federal Communications Commission
"commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology