HR7387-119

In Committee

Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Feb 5, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act prohibits federal officials or agents from entering or enforcing civil settlement agreements on behalf of the United States that direct payments to anyone other than the United States, unless the payment directly remedies actual harm caused by the payer, including environmental harm, or pays for services rendered in connection with the case. Violating officials face the same penalties that apply for violating the miscellaneous receipts statute. The bill applies prospectively to settlements after enactment. Each agency head must report qualifying third-party settlement payments to CBO annually for seven years, and each agency inspector general must publicly report any settlement entered in violation of the Act to House and Senate Judiciary, Budget, and Appropriations committees.

Who Benefits and How

Federal taxpayers and Congress benefit because settlement money is less likely to be routed to outside organizations without a direct-remedy connection and because CBO and inspectors general receive reporting duties. Settlement victims and environmental remediation projects still benefit when a payment directly remedies actual harm. Agency inspectors general gain a clear mandate to expose violations publicly.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal agencies, DOJ litigators, and agency counsel must stop using settlements that direct payments to unrelated third parties and must document allowed restitution or service payments. Outside organizations that previously could receive settlement-directed donations lose that revenue path unless they are directly remedying actual harm or providing case services. Agency heads, CBO, and inspectors general must absorb annual reporting work without new appropriations.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits federal settlement agreements from directing payments to third parties unless the payment directly remedies actual harm or pays for case-related services.
  • Subjects violating federal officials to penalties equivalent to miscellaneous receipts statute violations.
  • Requires agency heads to report qualifying third-party settlement payments to CBO annually for seven years without new appropriations.
  • Requires agency inspectors general to publicly report settlement violations to House and Senate Judiciary, Budget, and Appropriations committees.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bars federal settlement agreements from directing payments to third parties unless the payment directly remedies actual harm or pays for case-related services, and adds CBO and inspector general reporting.

Key Policy Areas

Government, Government Ethics, Legal Services

Primary Purpose

Bars federal settlement agreements from directing payments to third parties unless the payment directly remedies actual harm or pays for case-related services, and adds CBO and inspector general reporting.

Policy Domains

Government Government Ethics Legal Services

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Congressional oversight committees
  • Settlement victims
  • Agency inspectors general
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers: ,
Settlement victims: ,
Agency inspectors general: ,
Congressional oversight committees: ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal agencies
  • DOJ litigators
  • Agency counsel
  • Outside organizations
  • CBO
  • Agency inspectors general
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
CBO: ,
Agency counsel: ,
DOJ litigators: ,
Federal agencies: ,
Outside organizations: ,
Agency inspectors general: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 5, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 5, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 5, 2026

Mr. Gooden (for himself, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Moore …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
5 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative ?1 uncertain

Agency inspectors general, CBO, DOJ litigators

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Outside organizations

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Taxpayers

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Government Ethics Legal Services
Actor Mappings
"ig"
→ Agency inspectors general
"cbo"
→ Congressional Budget Office

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology