HR7352-119

In Committee

PASTEUR Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Feb 4, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The PASTEUR Act creates a new Public Health Service Act part for U.S. novel antimicrobial supply contracts. HHS may contract with sponsors of eligible antimicrobials that treat CDC urgent or serious antimicrobial-resistance threats, or other HHS-designated pathogens, and address an unmet medical need. Sponsors must apply within two years after FDA approval or licensure, HHS must review applications within 90 days, and HHS must issue scoring regulations within 270 days using patient-care value, innovation, domestic manufacturing, product stability, resistance activity, and public-health benefit. Approved products receive subscription-style annual payments for up to 10 years, calculated by regulation, no less than $75 million and no more than $300 million per year before CPI adjustment, reduced by U.S. net revenue. In exchange, sponsors must keep the drug commercially available, maintain supply for susceptibility-test device manufacturers, report resistance data, educate clinicians and patients, submit stewardship and global registration plans when requested, address shortages, manufacture adequate volume, and meet manufacturing and environmental best practices. The bill also creates a 15-member Critical Need Antimicrobial Advisory Group with conflict-of-interest rules, establishes CDC-backed health-facility stewardship grants and outpatient stewardship pilots, and appropriates $6 billion for fiscal year 2026, with up to 6.5 percent available for stewardship grants.

Who Benefits and How

Antimicrobial drug sponsors, biotech companies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, infectious-disease patients, hospitals without stewardship programs, rural hospitals, critical access hospitals, Tribal hospitals, safety-net hospitals, urgent care clinics, hospital outpatient departments, retail clinics, infectious-disease clinicians, CDC surveillance programs, and the U.S. military benefit from a pull incentive for new antimicrobials and funding to improve appropriate use. Patients benefit indirectly because the payment model rewards availability of drugs that may not generate large sales if used carefully.

Who Bears the Burden and How

HHS, CDC, CMS, BARDA, FDA, the Critical Need Antimicrobial Advisory Group, contract antimicrobial sponsors, health care facilities receiving grants, outpatient stewardship grantees, and federal taxpayers bear the implementation and funding burden. Sponsors must accept supply, resistance-reporting, education, stewardship, shortage, manufacturing-volume, environmental, and revenue-disclosure obligations to receive payments.

Key Provisions

  • Creates HHS contracts for eligible antimicrobials that address CDC urgent or serious threats or other HHS-designated pathogens and unmet medical needs.
  • Requires HHS to score eligible antimicrobials by patient-care benefit, innovation, and public-health or health-system value before awarding contracts.
  • Authorizes annual subscription payments of $75 million to $300 million, CPI-adjusted and reduced by U.S. net revenue, for contract terms lasting up to 10 years.
  • Requires sponsors to maintain U.S. commercial availability, supply susceptibility-test manufacturers, report resistance trends, educate clinicians and patients, address shortages, and follow manufacturing and environmental best practices.
  • Establishes a Critical Need Antimicrobial Advisory Group and CDC-backed stewardship grants for hospitals, rural facilities, Tribal hospitals, safety-net hospitals, and outpatient care settings.
  • Appropriates $6 billion for fiscal year 2026 and allows up to 6.5 percent to support antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a $6 billion HHS antimicrobial subscription program that pays sponsors of high-value novel antimicrobials annual contracts while funding stewardship grants for hospitals, outpatient facilities, and CDC surveillance participation.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Biotech, Public Health, Federal Budget

Primary Purpose

Creates a $6 billion HHS antimicrobial subscription program that pays sponsors of high-value novel antimicrobials annual contracts while funding stewardship grants for hospitals, outpatient facilities, and CDC surveillance participation.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Biotech Public Health Federal Budget

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Antimicrobial drug sponsors
  • Biotech companies
  • Pharmaceutical manufacturers
  • Infectious disease patients
  • Rural hospitals
  • Critical access hospitals
  • Tribal hospitals
  • Safety-net hospitals
  • Urgent care clinics
  • CDC surveillance programs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Rural hospitals: , , ,
Tribal hospitals: , , ,
Biotech companies: , , ,
Urgent care clinics: , , ,
Safety-net hospitals: , , ,
CDC surveillance programs: , , ,
Critical access hospitals: , , ,
Antimicrobial drug sponsors: , , ,
Infectious disease patients: , , ,
Pharmaceutical manufacturers: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • HHS
  • CDC
  • CMS
  • BARDA
  • FDA
  • Critical Need Antimicrobial Advisory Group
  • Contract antimicrobial sponsors
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
CDC: , , ,
CMS: , , ,
FDA: , , ,
HHS: , , ,
BARDA: , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , ,
Contract antimicrobial sponsors: , , ,
Critical Need Antimicrobial Advisory Group: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 4, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …

Feb 4, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 4, 2026

Mr. Carter of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Peters, Mr. Langworthy, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Healthcare
19 mentions across 7 clauses
+11 positive -7 negative ?1 uncertain

CDC, Critical Need Antimicrobial Advisory Group, Critical access hospitals

HHS faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Critical access hospitals, Hospital stewardship programs, Hospitals, Infectious disease patients, Infectious disease physicians, Patient advocates, Rural hospitals, Safety-net hospitals, Urgent care clinics

Negative-direction: CDC, Critical Need Antimicrobial Advisory Group, FDA, Outpatient stewardship grantees

Pharmaceuticals
9 mentions across 6 clauses
+5 positive -2 negative ?2 uncertain

Antimicrobial developers, Antimicrobial drug sponsors, Biological product manufacturers

Positive-direction: Antimicrobial drug sponsors, Biotech companies

Negative-direction: Antimicrobial developers, Contract antimicrobial sponsors

Taxpayers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Taxpayers

Healthcare Beneficiaries
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

CMS

Defense
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

U.S. military

Tribal Nations
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Tribal hospitals

7/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Biotech Public Health Federal Budget
Actor Mappings
"Director"
→ Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
"Secretary"
→ Secretary of Health and Human Services
"Commissioner"
→ Commissioner of Food and Drugs
"Administrator"
→ Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"eligible antimicrobial" §399PP-3

An antimicrobial drug or biological product that meets the section 399PP eligibility criteria for contract consideration.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology