HR7329-119

In Committee

FREEDOM Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 3, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The FREEDOM Act adds a new title to the Energy Act of 2020 focused on reliable energy, open markets, and federal permitting. It defines covered energy projects, authorizations, project sponsors, courts, capital contributions, unrecoverable losses, and related terms. For eligible energy projects seeking rights-of-way under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, agencies must move quickly after notices and applications. The bill creates a DOE De-Risking Compensation Program for project sponsors whose enrolled covered energy projects suffer unrecoverable losses because authorizations are revoked, cancelled, vacated, remanded, stayed, suspended, or otherwise blocked in specified ways. Sponsors enroll after initiating permitting, pay premiums, and may receive compensation if the Court determines eligibility. A De-Risking Compensation Fund in Treasury receives premiums and appropriations. The bill also creates a notice-of-initiation process, agency project schedules, authorization deadlines, a mechanism for court-approved contractors when agencies miss deadlines, a Permitting Performance Fund, judicial causes of action for project sponsors, venue rules, petition requirements, expedited schedules, relief, civil penalties, appeals, and accelerated treatment of other parties' challenges to complex authorizations. Agencies generally may not terminate construction or operation of fully permitted projects except under specified circumstances. The Comptroller General must survey industry satisfaction with permitting within 180 days and annually thereafter. Separate geothermal provisions increase lease-sale frequency, address replacement sales, authorize regulations, and bar federal drilling permits for certain geothermal activity on nonfederal surface estates.

Who Benefits and How

Energy project sponsors benefit from tighter permitting schedules, new judicial-review tools, possible compensation for stranded capital, and protection against late-stage agency reversals. Geothermal operators benefit from more frequent leasing and fewer federal drilling permit requirements for qualifying nonfederal-surface activities. Investors, utilities, manufacturers, and lenders benefit if the de-risking program and funds reduce uncertainty around permits, court delays, and authorization reversals. State energy markets and energy consumers may benefit if covered projects reach construction and operation faster. Congress benefits from annual GAO surveys measuring industry satisfaction with federal permitting.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal permitting agencies must process notices, determine completeness, set schedules, meet authorization deadlines, respond to petitions, potentially accept court-approved contractor work, and avoid termination orders for fully permitted projects. DOE must administer the De-Risking Compensation Program, collect premiums, manage claims, and pay compensation from the Fund. Treasury Department must hold the Fund. Federal district courts, the D.C. Circuit, and the Court of Federal Claims must handle expedited petitions and issue decisions within tight timelines absent extraordinary circumstances. Environmental plaintiffs and community challengers face accelerated deadlines and narrowed procedural terrain. Federal taxpayers may fund appropriations to the de-risking and permitting funds. BLM and Interior must update geothermal leasing and nonfederal-surface permitting rules.

Key Provisions

  • Adds a new Energy Act title for covered energy project permitting, compensation, deadlines, judicial review, and reporting.
  • Creates a DOE De-Risking Compensation Program and Treasury fund for enrolled projects that suffer unrecoverable losses from authorization reversals or other covered events.
  • Requires notices of initiation, project schedules, authorization deadlines, and court-approved contractor remedies when agencies miss milestones.
  • Creates expedited judicial review, civil penalties, appeals rules, and accelerated treatment of third-party challenges.
  • Improves geothermal leasing and bars federal drilling permits for certain geothermal activities on nonfederal surface estates.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a federal permitting acceleration and de-risking framework for covered energy projects, including rights-of-way deadlines on federal land, a DOE De-Risking Compensation Program and Fund for unrecoverable project losses caused by authorization reversals, notices of initiation and binding project schedules, authorization deadlines, court-approved contractor remedies, a Permitting Performance Fund, expedited judicial review and penalties, protections for fully permitted projects, annual GAO permitting surveys, and geothermal leasing and nonfederal-surface drilling permit changes.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Permitting, Judicial Review, Geothermal, Federal Lands

Primary Purpose

Creates a federal permitting acceleration and de-risking framework for covered energy projects, including rights-of-way deadlines on federal land, a DOE De-Risking Compensation Program and Fund for unrecoverable project losses caused by authorization reversals, notices of initiation and binding project schedules, authorization deadlines, court-approved contractor remedies, a Permitting Performance Fund, expedited judicial review and penalties, protections for fully permitted projects, annual GAO permitting surveys, and geothermal leasing and nonfederal-surface drilling permit changes.

Policy Domains

Energy Permitting Judicial Review Geothermal Federal Lands

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Energy project sponsors
  • Geothermal operators
  • Investors
  • Energy consumers
  • Utilities
  • Manufacturers
  • Congress
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Congress: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Investors: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Utilities: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Manufacturers: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Energy consumers: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Geothermal operators: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Energy project sponsors: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal permitting agencies
  • DOE
  • Treasury Department
  • BLM
  • Federal district courts
  • D.C. Circuit
  • Comptroller General
  • Environmental organizations
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
BLM: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
DOE: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
D.C. Circuit: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comptroller General: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Treasury Department: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Federal district courts: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Environmental organizations: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Federal permitting agencies: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 20, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and …

Feb 4, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

Feb 3, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition …

Feb 3, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 3, 2026

Mr. Harder of California (for himself, Mr. Lawler, Mr. Bacon, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
35 mentions across 20 clauses
+4 positive -31 negative

Comptroller General, Congress, Court of Federal Claims

Federal permitting agencies, Treasury Department face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Congress

Negative-direction: Comptroller General, Court of Federal Claims, D.C. Circuit, DOE, Federal district courts, Interior Department, Permitting staff, Reviewing courts

Energy
25 mentions across 23 clauses
+20 positive -4 negative ?1 uncertain

Energy project sponsors, Fully permitted energy projects, Geothermal operators

Energy project sponsors, Geothermal operators face effects in multiple directions

General Public
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+1 positive -5 negative

BLM, Federal land managers

BLM faces effects in multiple directions

Financial Services
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Energy investors, Investors

Taxpayers
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-4 negative

Taxpayers

Environment
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Environmental plaintiffs

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Court-approved contractors

Real Estate
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Private landowners

24/25
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Permitting Judicial Review Geothermal Federal Lands

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology