Deadly Force Independent Review Act of 2026
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Deadly Force Independent Review Act requires each federal law-enforcement agency to establish a protocol for investigating every occasion when an agency officer uses deadly force. The protocol must require all collected evidence to be made available to appropriate State and local authorities. If the agency inspector general does not conduct the investigation, the inspector general must independently review the findings to verify thoroughness, protocol compliance, and evidentiary support. Findings of wrongdoing must be reported for discipline or prosecution. The Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency must create a uniform governmentwide reporting methodology and investigation guidelines. The Council must submit quarterly reports to House Oversight, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and the Comptroller General with incident details, demographics, dates, locations, agency explanations, guidelines, and non-lethal efforts. Names and identifying information are protected from public release and FOIA except in limited circumstances.
Who Benefits and How
People subjected to federal deadly force and their families benefit from mandatory investigations, evidence preservation, inspector general review, and reporting of wrongdoing. State law enforcement agencies and local law enforcement agencies benefit because evidence must be made available to them. Congress and the Comptroller General benefit from quarterly governmentwide data. Federal inspectors general benefit from clearer authority to review investigations that they did not directly conduct.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal law-enforcement agencies must create protocols, initiate investigations after every use of deadly force, collect and share evidence, document explanations, and provide data for reporting. Agency inspectors general must conduct independent reviews and refer wrongdoing. The Council of Inspectors General must build governmentwide reporting and investigation standards. Agencies must protect identifying information from public release, FOIA disclosure, and unauthorized disclosure.
Key Provisions
- Requires federal law-enforcement agencies to investigate every use of deadly force by an agency officer.
- Requires evidence collected in those investigations to be made available to appropriate State and local authorities.
- Requires inspector general independent review when the inspector general does not conduct the investigation.
- Requires governmentwide reporting methods, investigation guidelines, and quarterly reports.
- Restricts public, FOIA, and unauthorized disclosure of identifying information.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires every federal law-enforcement agency to establish protocols for investigating each use of deadly force, requires inspector general review when the inspector general does not conduct the investigation, creates governmentwide reporting methods, mandates quarterly reports to Congress and GAO, and restricts public disclosure of identifying information.
Key Policy Areas
Law Enforcement, Government Oversight, Civil Rights
Primary Purpose
Requires every federal law-enforcement agency to establish protocols for investigating each use of deadly force, requires inspector general review when the inspector general does not conduct the investigation, creates governmentwide reporting methods, mandates quarterly reports to Congress and GAO, and restricts public disclosure of identifying information.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- People subjected to deadly force
- State law enforcement agencies
- Local law enforcement agencies
- Congress
- Comptroller General
Identified Costs
- Federal law-enforcement agencies
- Agency inspectors general
- Council of Inspectors General
- Federal officers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Federal law-enforcement agencies, Federal officers, Local law enforcement agencies
Federal officers faces effects in multiple directions
Positive-direction: Local law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies
Negative-direction: Federal law-enforcement agencies
Agency inspectors general, Comptroller General, Congress
Positive-direction: Comptroller General, Congress
Negative-direction: Agency inspectors general, Council of Inspectors General
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology