HR7305-119

Reported

Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Feb 2, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026 amends the Energy Sector Operational Support for Cyberresilience Program in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. It adds a purpose to strengthen the collective defense, response, and resilience of the U.S. energy sector by enhancing collaboration between government and the energy sector to analyze threats and deny, disrupt, and mitigate operational impacts to energy systems.

The bill directs the program to exchange information at classified and unclassified levels, collectively analyze potential and realized threats, and provide mitigation recommendations that benefit the broader energy sector. It also calls for technical infrastructure to house, access, and perform advanced analytics and experimentation, enabling analysis, discovery, alerts, collaboration activities, and sharing of actionable insights from intelligence-driven and intelligence-informed technical data, knowledge, and threat information. The program must advance understanding of national-security risks and vulnerabilities that adversaries could exploit and increase energy-sector understanding of threat actor tactics, techniques, procedures, indicators of compromise, capabilities, and activities.

Who Benefits and How

Electric utilities benefit from classified and unclassified threat information, analytics, alerts, and mitigation recommendations. Pipeline operators benefit from operational collaboration focused on adversary tactics and energy-system impacts. Natural gas operators benefit from shared intelligence and technical data on cyber and physical threats. DOE cybersecurity staff benefit from a clearer statutory mission for an energy threat analysis center function. Energy-sector information-sharing organizations benefit from infrastructure for analysis, discovery, alerts, and collaboration. Energy consumers benefit if better threat analysis reduces disruption risk.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DOE Office of Cybersecurity Energy Security and Emergency Response staff must build or administer technical infrastructure for analytics, experimentation, alerts, and collaboration. Energy companies sharing operational data must manage classified and unclassified information-handling requirements. Utility cybersecurity teams must absorb recommendations and act on threat indicators. Federal intelligence partners must support intelligence-informed technical analysis. Energy-sector operators may face more requests to share data on vulnerabilities, incidents, and mitigation actions.

Key Provisions

  • Expands the Energy Sector Operational Support for Cyberresilience Program to strengthen collective energy-sector defense, response, and resilience.
  • Requires classified and unclassified information exchange between government and the energy sector.
  • Requires collective analysis of potential and realized threats and recommendations to mitigate them.
  • Provides for technical infrastructure for advanced analytics, experimentation, discovery, alerts, and collaboration.
  • Requires sharing actionable insights from intelligence-driven and intelligence-informed technical data.
  • Requires analysis of national-security risks, vulnerabilities, tactics, techniques, procedures, indicators of compromise, capabilities, and adversary activities.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Adds an energy-sector threat-analysis and operational collaboration mission to the Energy Sector Operational Support for Cyberresilience Program, including classified and unclassified information exchange, shared analytics infrastructure, experimentation, threat discovery, alerts, and mitigation recommendations for the U.S. energy sector.

Key Policy Areas

Energy Security, Cybersecurity, Critical Infrastructure, National Security

Primary Purpose

Adds an energy-sector threat-analysis and operational collaboration mission to the Energy Sector Operational Support for Cyberresilience Program, including classified and unclassified information exchange, shared analytics infrastructure, experimentation, threat discovery, alerts, and mitigation recommendations for the U.S. energy sector.

Policy Domains

Energy Security Cybersecurity Critical Infrastructure National Security

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Electric utilities
  • Pipeline operators
  • Natural gas operators
  • DOE cybersecurity staff
  • Energy-sector information-sharing organizations
  • Energy consumers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Energy consumers: ,
Electric utilities: ,
Pipeline operators: ,
Natural gas operators: ,
DOE cybersecurity staff: ,
Energy-sector information-sharing organizations: ,
Identified Costs
  • DOE Office of Cybersecurity Energy Security and Emergency Response staff
  • Energy companies sharing operational data
  • Utility cybersecurity teams
  • Federal intelligence partners
  • Energy-sector operators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Energy-sector operators: ,
Utility cybersecurity teams: ,
Federal intelligence partners: ,
Energy companies sharing operational data: ,
DOE Office of Cybersecurity Energy Security and Emergency Response staff: ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 12, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 563.

May 12, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. …

May 12, 2026

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Feb 4, 2026

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

Feb 4, 2026

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 2, 2026

Ms. Castor of Florida (for herself and Mr. Evans of …

Feb 2, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Energy
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -3 negative

DOE Office of Cybersecurity Energy Security and Emergency Response staff, Energy-sector information-sharing organizations

Positive-direction: Energy-sector information-sharing organizations

Negative-direction: DOE Office of Cybersecurity Energy Security and Emergency Response staff

Oil & Gas
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive

Natural gas operators, Pipeline operators

Utilities
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Electric utilities

Technology
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Utility cybersecurity teams

National Security
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Federal intelligence partners

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Security Cybersecurity Critical Infrastructure National Security
Actor Mappings
"doe"
→ Department of Energy
"ceser"
→ Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology