Qualified Immunity Accountability Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Qualified Immunity Accountability Act amends 42 U.S.C. 1983 to remove two core immunity defenses in civil rights cases against local law enforcement officers and in actions under any source of law against federal investigative or law-enforcement officers. Defendants could no longer argue that they acted in good faith or reasonably believed their conduct was lawful. They also could not defend on the ground that the right was not clearly established or that the law was unclear enough that they could not reasonably have known their conduct was unlawful. The bill cross-references the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act definition for local law enforcement officers and the Federal Tort Claims Act investigative or law enforcement officer definition for federal officers.
Who Benefits and How
Civil rights plaintiffs benefit because lawsuits against local police officers and federal investigative or law-enforcement officers would no longer fail solely because the right was not clearly established or the officer claimed good faith. Victims of unconstitutional searches, seizures, force, arrests, or other misconduct benefit from a lower barrier to damages litigation. Civil rights attorneys benefit because they can litigate the merits of rights violations instead of first finding factually similar precedent. Federal and local accountability advocates benefit if the change increases deterrence and settlement leverage.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Local law enforcement officers, federal investigative officers, and federal law-enforcement officers face greater damages exposure because two common immunity defenses would be unavailable. Local governments and federal agencies may face higher litigation, indemnification, settlement, and training costs. Federal courts must resolve more claims on the underlying legality of the officer conduct rather than dismissing them under clearly established law. Police departments and federal agencies must adjust training and risk-management practices to account for broader civil liability.
Key Provisions
- Bars good-faith and reasonable-belief immunity defenses for local law enforcement officers in section 1983 actions.
- Bars clearly-established-law immunity defenses for local law enforcement officers in section 1983 actions.
- Applies the same defense limits to federal investigative or law-enforcement officers in actions under any source of law.
- Uses existing statutory definitions for local law enforcement officers and federal investigative or law-enforcement officers.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Eliminates qualified-immunity defenses based on good faith, reasonable belief, or not-clearly-established law for local law enforcement officers under section 1983 and federal investigative or law-enforcement officers under any source of law.
Key Policy Areas
Civil Rights, Law Enforcement, Courts
Primary Purpose
Eliminates qualified-immunity defenses based on good faith, reasonable belief, or not-clearly-established law for local law enforcement officers under section 1983 and federal investigative or law-enforcement officers under any source of law.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Civil rights plaintiffs
- Misconduct victims
- Civil rights attorneys
- Accountability advocates
Identified Costs
- Local law enforcement officers
- Federal investigative officers
- Federal courts
- Local governments
- Federal agencies
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeSponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1989)
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Ms. Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Civil rights attorneys, Civil rights plaintiffs
Federal investigative officers, Local law enforcement officers
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology