HR7273-119

Reported

NASA Reauthorization Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jan 30, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The NASA Reauthorization Act of 2026 authorizes $24.438 billion for NASA for fiscal year 2026. The bill allocates funding across exploration, space operations, science, space technology, aeronautics, STEM engagement, safety and mission services, construction, and inspector general work. It then gives policy direction across NASA's major mission areas rather than simply setting a topline number.

For exploration, the bill reaffirms Artemis, Moon-to-Mars, Space Launch System, Orion, ground systems, commercial lunar landers, advanced spacesuits, and international and commercial partnerships. It requires NASA to maintain clear objectives, preserve SLS and Orion capabilities, use at least two human-rated lunar landing providers when practicable, and report on spacesuit and lunar lander progress. It also directs a low-Earth-orbit transition strategy, GAO reporting on U.S. objectives in low-Earth orbit, ISS service and crew transportation continuity, commercial low-Earth-orbit station development, and acquisition of ISS deorbit capabilities from U.S. commercial providers.

For technology and aeronautics, the bill supports lunar surface power purchase agreement analysis, cryogenic valve technology review, experimental aircraft demonstrations, hypersonics research, advanced materials and manufacturing, advanced air mobility, unmanned aircraft systems, NASA wildfire-response tools through ACERO, hydrogen aviation, high-performance chase aircraft, a civil aeronautics decadal survey, and a commercial hypersonics testing program. For science, it reaffirms balanced science portfolios, cost-cap discipline, Landsat continuity, commercial Earth observation data, commercial satellite data acquisition, agricultural applications of NASA data, planetary science, planetary defense, lunar science, Mars Sample Return, Hubble servicing studies, Great Observatories technology maturation, heliophysics, commercial space-weather data, wildland fire science, and National Wildland Fire Management Commission recommendations.

The bill also reforms the Space Grant program, supports skilled technical workforce outreach, requires GAO and independent cost-estimate oversight, allows transfers from other agencies for NASA research and education, requires reports on a space resources institute, standardizes NASA reports to Congress, creates a NASA public-private talent exchange program, requires Space Act agreement intellectual-property review, creates NASA-wide mentoring, and restricts NASA, OSTP, and the National Space Council from using funds for bilateral cooperation with the People's Republic of China or PRC-owned companies unless later law specifically authorizes it or required safety certification is made.

Who Benefits and How

NASA mission directorates benefit from a full-year authorization and detailed congressional support for exploration, operations, science, technology, aeronautics, STEM, and mission support. Artemis contractors benefit from continued SLS, Orion, ground systems, human lunar lander, and spacesuit direction. U.S. commercial space providers benefit from commercial low-Earth-orbit agreements, ISS deorbit capability acquisition, lunar payload services, lunar power studies, and commercial suborbital mission review. NASA science researchers benefit from balanced portfolios, decadal-survey alignment, cost-cap discipline, Landsat reporting, lunar science, planetary science, heliophysics, and Great Observatories technology maturation. Commercial Earth observation companies benefit from NASA and OSTP consideration of commercial data purchases. Wildfire response agencies benefit from ACERO technologies, Earth science projects, and wildfire-management implementation work. Space Grant consortia, students, and technical workforce trainees benefit from multi-year awards and STEM outreach. Congressional oversight committees benefit from more GAO reports, cost estimates, briefings, and NASA report routing.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal taxpayers bear the $24.438 billion authorization and any downstream contract, grant, and program costs. NASA program managers must produce strategies, studies, reports, cost estimates, acquisition plans, and coordination documents across exploration, low-Earth orbit, science, aeronautics, education, and oversight. GAO analysts must review low-Earth-orbit objectives, early cost estimates, fire and emergency services, Space Act agreement intellectual property, and other oversight topics. Non-U.S. commercial space providers lose opportunities where the bill requires United States commercial providers. PRC space agencies and PRC-owned companies are barred from NASA bilateral cooperation funded by the Act unless Congress later authorizes it or NASA, OSTP, or the National Space Council certifies no transfer or security risk. NASA procurement and legal staff must enforce domestic-provider requirements, China restrictions, reporting deadlines, and contract oversight.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes $24.438 billion for NASA for fiscal year 2026 across major mission accounts.
  • Directs Artemis, Moon-to-Mars, Space Launch System, Orion, lunar landing, and spacesuit policy.
  • Requires strategies and reports for continued U.S. presence in low-Earth orbit and ISS transition.
  • Provides support for commercial low-Earth-orbit platforms and U.S. ISS deorbit capabilities.
  • Authorizes studies and reviews on lunar power, cryogenic valves, suborbital crew missions, and orbital debris.
  • Expands aeronautics work on experimental aircraft, hypersonics, advanced manufacturing, advanced air mobility, wildfire-response operations, hydrogen aviation, and chase aircraft.
  • Establishes or strengthens commercial satellite data, agricultural data, planetary defense, lunar science, and wildland fire science activities.
  • Provides Space Grant reforms and STEM technical workforce outreach.
  • Requires GAO reviews, independent cost estimates, NASA report routing, Space Act agreement review, talent exchange, and mentoring.
  • Restricts NASA-funded bilateral cooperation with PRC space entities unless later law or safety certification allows it.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Authorizes $24.438 billion for NASA in fiscal year 2026 and sets detailed policy direction for Artemis and Moon-to-Mars exploration, Space Launch System and Orion, commercial lunar landers, spacesuits, ISS operations and deorbit, commercial low-Earth-orbit stations, lunar power and cryogenic technology, aeronautics and hypersonics, Earth science and commercial satellite data, agricultural applications, planetary defense, Space Grant, workforce programs, cost oversight, talent exchanges, mentoring, and restrictions on NASA cooperation with the People's Republic of China.

Key Policy Areas

Space Exploration, Commercial Space, Aeronautics, Earth Science, STEM Education, Federal Oversight, National Security

Primary Purpose

Authorizes $24.438 billion for NASA in fiscal year 2026 and sets detailed policy direction for Artemis and Moon-to-Mars exploration, Space Launch System and Orion, commercial lunar landers, spacesuits, ISS operations and deorbit, commercial low-Earth-orbit stations, lunar power and cryogenic technology, aeronautics and hypersonics, Earth science and commercial satellite data, agricultural applications, planetary defense, Space Grant, workforce programs, cost oversight, talent exchanges, mentoring, and restrictions on NASA cooperation with the People's Republic of China.

Policy Domains

Space Exploration Commercial Space Aeronautics Earth Science STEM Education Federal Oversight National Security

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • NASA mission directorates
  • Artemis contractors
  • U.S. commercial space providers
  • NASA science researchers
  • Commercial Earth observation companies
  • Wildfire response agencies
  • Space Grant consortia
  • Students in STEM programs
  • Technical workforce trainees
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Artemis contractors: , , , , , , , , ,
Space Grant consortia: , , , , , , , , ,
NASA science researchers: , , , , , , , , ,
NASA mission directorates: , , , , , , , , ,
Students in STEM programs: , , , , , , , , ,
Wildfire response agencies: , , , , , , , , ,
Technical workforce trainees: , , , , , , , , ,
U.S. commercial space providers: , , , , , , , , ,
Congressional oversight committees: , , , , , , , , ,
Commercial Earth observation companies: , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal taxpayers
  • NASA program managers
  • GAO analysts
  • Non-U.S. commercial space providers
  • PRC space agencies
  • PRC-owned companies
  • NASA procurement staff
  • NASA legal staff
  • Federal reporting staff
  • NASA cost-estimate staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
GAO analysts: , , , , , , , , ,
NASA legal staff: , , , , , , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , , , , , , ,
PRC space agencies: , , , , , , , , ,
PRC-owned companies: , , , , , , , , ,
NASA program managers: , , , , , , , , ,
NASA procurement staff: , , , , , , , , ,
Federal reporting staff: , , , , , , , , ,
NASA cost-estimate staff: , , , , , , , , ,
Non-U.S. commercial space providers: , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 4, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Feb 4, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jan 30, 2026

Mr. Babin (for himself, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Haridopolos, and Mrs. …

Jan 30, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Jan 30, 2026

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

NASA
94 mentions across 61 clauses
+24 positive -70 negative

Artemis surface systems teams, NASA EVA program managers, NASA Earth Science Division staff

Positive-direction: Artemis surface systems teams, NASA Inspector General staff, NASA aeronautics researchers, NASA mission directorates, NASA science researchers, NASA workforce

Negative-direction: NASA EVA program managers, NASA Earth Science Division staff, NASA ISS program managers, NASA STEM engagement staff, NASA aeronautics program managers, NASA cost-estimate staff, NASA exploration program managers, NASA human landing system managers, NASA legal staff, NASA low-Earth orbit program managers, NASA program managers, NASA reporting staff, NASA science mission managers, NASA space operations managers, NASA space technology managers, Planetary Defense Coordination Office

Commercial Space
42 mentions across 36 clauses
+40 positive -2 negative

Commercial crew providers, Commercial lunar lander providers, Commercial lunar payload providers

Positive-direction: Commercial crew providers, Commercial lunar lander providers, Commercial lunar payload providers, Commercial space station providers, Commercial spacesuit providers, ISS deorbit providers, Lunar communications providers, Private sector space employees

Negative-direction: Non-U.S. commercial space providers

Defense
32 mentions across 26 clauses
+32 positive

Aerospace contractors, Artemis contractors, Hypersonics technology companies

Congressional Committees
19 mentions across 19 clauses
+19 positive

Congressional oversight committees

Government
18 mentions across 18 clauses
+5 positive -13 negative

Federal data users, GAO analysts

Positive-direction: Federal data users

Negative-direction: GAO analysts

Remote Sensing
17 mentions across 17 clauses
+17 positive

Commercial Earth observation companies, Commercial space weather data providers

Emergency Management
16 mentions across 16 clauses
+16 positive

Wildfire management agencies, Wildfire response agencies

Transportation
16 mentions across 4 clauses
+12 positive -4 negative

Advanced air mobility companies, Foreign drone manufacturers, Hydrogen aviation researchers

Positive-direction: Advanced air mobility companies, Hydrogen aviation researchers, U.S. drone manufacturers

Negative-direction: Foreign drone manufacturers

63/73
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Space Exploration Commercial Space Aeronautics Earth Science STEM Education Federal Oversight National Security
Actor Mappings
"gao"
→ Comptroller General of the United States
"ostp"
→ Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy
"administrator"
→ NASA Administrator

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology