HR7237-119

In Committee

Chemical Abortion Risk Awareness Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 23, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Chemical Abortion Risk Awareness Act creates a new Public Health Service Act title. It defines chemical abortion as using or prescribing an abortion-inducing drug with intent to cause death of an unborn child, while excluding life-saving separation when no other mitigation is possible, ectopic or molar pregnancy treatment, and miscarriage treatment. It defines chemical abortion providers, unborn child, and woman. Effective 30 days after enactment, a federally funded chemical abortion provider, or a provider working in or on behalf of a federally funded medical practice or company, must comply before knowingly performing, inducing, or attempting a chemical abortion. At least 24 hours before the procedure, the provider must give the woman full FDA-approved product labels for each abortion-inducing drug in both electronic and paper form, highlight warnings and precautions and adverse reactions or similar sections, read those highlighted sections aloud, and obtain written confirmation. Within 30 days, the provider or entity must submit an implementation plan to the HHS Secretary. HHS may withhold federal funding from noncompliant providers or their employers. A woman or a parent of a woman who received or was subject to an attempted chemical abortion in violation of the title may sue for verifiable physical and psychological injuries, statutory damages equal to three times the abortion cost, punitive damages, and attorney fees for prevailing plaintiffs; prevailing defendants recover fees only for frivolous suits, and damages or fees generally cannot be assessed against the woman. The bill preserves more extensive State disclosure or penalty laws and includes severability.

Who Benefits and How

Women receiving abortion-inducing drugs, parents eligible to sue under the bill, anti-abortion advocates, State officials with more extensive disclosure laws, and plaintiffs' attorneys benefit from mandatory label delivery, oral warning disclosure, written confirmation, funding-withholding leverage, and a private civil-action remedy. HHS gains a federal compliance hook over federally funded providers.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Chemical abortion providers, federally funded medical practices, reproductive health clinics, HHS enforcement staff, abortion patients facing waiting-period logistics, federal courts, and healthcare compliance counsel face new 24-hour disclosure, paper and electronic label, oral-reading, written-confirmation, implementation-plan, funding-withholding, civil-liability, damages, and attorney-fee burdens. Providers may have to redesign visits, telehealth workflows, documentation, and patient communications within 30 days.

Key Provisions

  • Defines chemical abortion, chemical abortion provider, unborn child, and woman for a new Public Health Service Act title.
  • Requires federally funded chemical abortion providers to comply beginning 30 days after enactment.
  • Requires full FDA-approved product labels in paper and electronic form at least 24 hours before a chemical abortion.
  • Requires providers to highlight and read warnings, precautions, and adverse reactions and obtain written confirmation.
  • Requires implementation plans within 30 days and authorizes HHS to withhold federal funding for noncompliance.
  • Creates a private civil action with verifiable damages, treble abortion-cost statutory damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees.
  • Preserves stronger State disclosure or penalty laws and includes severability.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Adds a Public Health Service Act chemical-abortion risk-awareness title requiring federally funded chemical abortion providers to provide FDA-approved drug labels in paper and electronic form at least 24 hours before the abortion, highlight and read warnings and adverse reactions, obtain written confirmation, file implementation plans within 30 days, face possible federal-funding withholding for noncompliance, face private civil actions by women or parents for damages, treble abortion-cost statutory damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees, preserve stronger State disclosure or penalty laws, and sever unconstitutional provisions.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Civil Rights, Courts

Primary Purpose

Adds a Public Health Service Act chemical-abortion risk-awareness title requiring federally funded chemical abortion providers to provide FDA-approved drug labels in paper and electronic form at least 24 hours before the abortion, highlight and read warnings and adverse reactions, obtain written confirmation, file implementation plans within 30 days, face possible federal-funding withholding for noncompliance, face private civil actions by women or parents for damages, treble abortion-cost statutory damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees, preserve stronger State disclosure or penalty laws, and sever unconstitutional provisions.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Civil Rights Courts

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Women receiving abortion-inducing drugs
  • Parents eligible to sue
  • Anti-abortion advocates
  • Plaintiffs attorneys
  • State disclosure-law enforcers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Plaintiffs attorneys: , , , , ,
Anti-abortion advocates: , , , , ,
Parents eligible to sue: , , , , ,
State disclosure-law enforcers: , , , , ,
Women receiving abortion-inducing drugs: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Chemical abortion providers
  • Federally funded medical practices
  • Reproductive health clinics
  • HHS enforcement staff
  • Federal courts
  • Healthcare compliance counsel
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal courts: , , , , ,
HHS enforcement staff: , , , , ,
Chemical abortion providers: , , , , ,
Reproductive health clinics: , , , , ,
Healthcare compliance counsel: , , , , ,
Federally funded medical practices: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 23, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jan 23, 2026

Introduced in House

Jan 23, 2026

Mr. Stutzman (for himself and Mrs. Harshbarger) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Healthcare
13 mentions across 5 clauses
+3 positive -9 negative ?1 uncertain

Chemical abortion providers, Federally funded medical practices, Reproductive health clinics

Positive-direction: Women bringing civil suits, Women protected from monetary awards, Women receiving abortion-inducing drugs

Negative-direction: Chemical abortion providers, Federally funded medical practices, Reproductive health clinics

Government
6 mentions across 5 clauses
-6 negative

Federal courts, HHS enforcement staff, HHS grant staff

Non-Profit Institutions
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Anti-abortion advocates

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

State disclosure-law enforcers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Parents bringing civil suits

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Plaintiffs attorneys

6/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Civil Rights Courts

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology