HR7233-119

In Committee

QR Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 22, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The QR Act adds identification and verification requirements to Immigration and Nationality Act section 287. Within 180 days after enactment, DHS must require each ICE or CBP officer or employee engaged in law-enforcement or immigration-enforcement activities to wear a scannable quick response code on the uniform in a position that remains clearly visible and unobscured. The QR code must link to an official public DHS website. That website must display the officer's full name, badge number, agency, operational unit or office, and active status with timestamp verification. It may display a photograph, but may not display home addresses, telephone numbers, or other personal contact information. It must also include a secure mechanism for the public to submit complaints about the officer's conduct during an enforcement activity and publish aggregated, non-personally identifiable complaint counts for each officer who has received complaints. The bill preserves other federal, State, or local transparency, accessibility, or accountability laws and policies.

Who Benefits and How

People stopped by ICE or CBP officers, immigrant communities, legal aid organizations, civil-rights monitors, journalists, and DHS accountability officials benefit from a real-time public method to verify an officer's identity, submit conduct complaints, and see aggregate complaint information without exposing the officer's personal contact details. Legitimate ICE and CBP personnel may benefit because timestamped public verification can distinguish active officers from impostors.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS technology teams, ICE officers, CBP officers, DHS privacy staff, complaint intake staff, union representatives, and field supervisors must build and maintain the QR system, issue visible uniform codes, publish identity and active-status information, protect personal contact information, process secure complaints, and publish aggregate complaint counts. Officers may face increased public scrutiny tied to individual badge numbers and complaint histories.

Key Provisions

  • Requires visible scannable QR codes on ICE and CBP uniforms during law-enforcement or immigration-enforcement activities.
  • Requires QR codes to link to an official public DHS webpage.
  • Requires the webpage to show officer name, badge number, agency, unit or office, and timestamped active status.
  • Allows an officer photograph but bars home address, telephone number, and personal contact information.
  • Requires a secure complaint mechanism and aggregated non-personally identifiable complaint counts.
  • Preserves other federal, State, or local transparency, accessibility, or accountability requirements.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires DHS within 180 days to make ICE and CBP officers engaged in law-enforcement or immigration-enforcement activities wear visible scannable QR codes that link to an official public DHS webpage showing the officer's name, badge number, agency, unit or office, active status with timestamp verification, optional photograph, no personal contact information, a secure complaint mechanism, and aggregated non-personally identifiable complaint counts, while preserving stronger transparency rules under other laws.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Law Enforcement, Technology

Primary Purpose

Requires DHS within 180 days to make ICE and CBP officers engaged in law-enforcement or immigration-enforcement activities wear visible scannable QR codes that link to an official public DHS webpage showing the officer's name, badge number, agency, unit or office, active status with timestamp verification, optional photograph, no personal contact information, a secure complaint mechanism, and aggregated non-personally identifiable complaint counts, while preserving stronger transparency rules under other laws.

Policy Domains

Immigration Law Enforcement Technology

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • People stopped by ICE officers
  • People stopped by CBP officers
  • Immigrant communities
  • Legal aid organizations
  • Civil-rights monitors
  • DHS accountability officials
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Civil-rights monitors:
Immigrant communities:
Legal aid organizations:
DHS accountability officials:
People stopped by CBP officers:
People stopped by ICE officers:
Identified Costs
  • DHS technology teams
  • ICE officers
  • CBP officers
  • DHS privacy staff
  • Complaint intake staff
  • Field supervisors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
CBP officers:
ICE officers:
DHS privacy staff:
Field supervisors:
DHS technology teams:
Complaint intake staff:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 23, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

Jan 22, 2026

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …

Jan 22, 2026

Introduced in House

Jan 22, 2026

Mr. Torres of New York (for himself, Mr. Soto, and …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Immigrant Communities
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

People stopped by CBP officers, People stopped by ICE officers

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

CBP officers, ICE officers

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

DHS technology teams

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Complaint intake staff

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Legal aid organizations

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Law Enforcement Technology

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology