HR7220-119

In Committee

COINTELPRO Full Disclosure Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 22, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The COINTELPRO Full Disclosure Act is modeled on a records-review framework rather than ordinary FOIA alone. Government offices must fully disclose COINTELPRO records within six months unless disclosure would clearly and demonstrably be expected to cause harm. If full disclosure is postponed, agencies must disclose segregable information, substitute records, or summaries where possible and transmit the record to a new COINTELPRO Records Review Board. Records not fully disclosed by the Board's termination become public after 25 years unless a high-level written recommendation and approval process justifies continued delay. The Archivist must create a COINTELPRO Records Collection at the National Archives within 60 days, preserve provenance, publish a guidebook and index, set transmission metadata rules, make records available for inspection and copying, prioritize digitization, and receive electronic searchable records within two years. A five-member independent Review Board appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate reviews agency postponements, recommends executive-branch disclosure decisions, has staff and advisory committees, publishes determinations, reports postponed material, can request Attorney General court and grand-jury petitions, and terminates after its work. Rules of construction give the Act priority over other nondisclosure law except tax-return secrecy, preserve privacy for personnel and medical files, and preserve FOIA and judicial-review rights.

Who Benefits and How

Civil rights researchers, historians, archivists, journalists, descendants of COINTELPRO targets, advocacy groups, public-interest lawyers, and the general public benefit from a dedicated public collection, digitization, indexes, disclosure deadlines, Review Board oversight, court-unsealing procedures, and a 25-year sunset on most remaining secrecy. The National Archives benefits from a clear statutory collection mandate and metadata criteria.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Government offices holding COINTELPRO records, FBI records custodians, National Archives staff, the President, Senate confirmation staff, COINTELPRO Review Board members, Review Board employees, Attorney General staff, originating agencies, and federal taxpayers face search, preservation, review, transmission, redaction, publication, security-clearance, litigation, staffing, and funding burdens. Agencies that rely on national-security, law-enforcement, intelligence, foreign-relations, personnel-file, or medical-file grounds must justify postponement under a specific and public review process.

Key Provisions

  • Requires government offices to fully disclose COINTELPRO records within six months unless harm standards justify postponement.
  • Requires segregable information, substitute records, or summaries when full disclosure is postponed.
  • Creates a National Archives COINTELPRO Records Collection with guidebook, index, metadata rules, public access, and digitization priority.
  • Establishes a five-member independent COINTELPRO Records Review Board appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
  • Directs the Review Board to publish disclosure determinations, review postponements, and recommend future disclosure dates.
  • Authorizes Attorney General petitions to unseal court or grand-jury information relevant to COINTELPRO.
  • Limits conflicting secrecy rules while preserving tax secrecy, personal privacy, FOIA rights, and judicial review.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires public disclosure and archival processing of COINTELPRO records, creates a COINTELPRO Records Collection at the National Archives, establishes an independent five-member COINTELPRO Records Review Board with subpoena-like review powers, staff, disclosure standards, website and Federal Register publication duties, court and grand-jury unsealing procedures, disclosure-preemption rules, privacy safeguards, interim funding, and definitions for records, government offices, originating bodies, and public interest.

Key Policy Areas

Civil Rights, Government, Archives

Primary Purpose

Requires public disclosure and archival processing of COINTELPRO records, creates a COINTELPRO Records Collection at the National Archives, establishes an independent five-member COINTELPRO Records Review Board with subpoena-like review powers, staff, disclosure standards, website and Federal Register publication duties, court and grand-jury unsealing procedures, disclosure-preemption rules, privacy safeguards, interim funding, and definitions for records, government offices, originating bodies, and public interest.

Policy Domains

Civil Rights Government Archives

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Civil rights researchers
  • Historians
  • Archivists
  • Journalists
  • Descendants of COINTELPRO targets
  • Advocacy groups
  • Public-interest lawyers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Archivists: , , , , , , , ,
Historians: , , , , , , , ,
Journalists: , , , , , , , ,
Advocacy groups: , , , , , , , ,
Public-interest lawyers: , , , , , , , ,
Civil rights researchers: , , , , , , , ,
Descendants of COINTELPRO targets: , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Government offices holding COINTELPRO records
  • FBI records custodians
  • National Archives staff
  • COINTELPRO Review Board members
  • Attorney General staff
  • Originating agencies
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers: , , , , , , , ,
Originating agencies: , , , , , , , ,
Attorney General staff: , , , , , , , ,
FBI records custodians: , , , , , , , ,
National Archives staff: , , , , , , , ,
COINTELPRO Review Board members: , , , , , , , ,
Government offices holding COINTELPRO records: , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 22, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and …

Jan 22, 2026

Introduced in House

Jan 22, 2026

Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania (for herself and Mr. Jackson of …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
21 mentions across 9 clauses
+2 positive -19 negative

Attorney General staff, COINTELPRO Review Board members, COINTELPRO Review Board staff

COINTELPRO Review Board members, COINTELPRO Review Board staff face effects in multiple directions

Research & Science
9 mentions across 7 clauses
+9 positive

Advisory committee members, Archivists, Civil rights researchers

Taxpayers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Taxpayers

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Journalists, Public-interest lawyers

General Public
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

COINTELPRO record requesters, Personnel-file subjects

Healthcare
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Medical-file subjects

9/12
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Civil Rights Government Archives

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology