American Family Housing Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The American Family Housing Act amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 to restrict large institutional ownership of single-family homes. Starting 100 days after enactment, a large-scale company may not purchase any single-family residence, including from the federal government. It also may not purchase equity securities of a qualified issuer if the transaction would result in the large-scale company holding more than 49 percent of that issuer. A large-scale company means a registered investment company or private fund with more than $100 billion in assets under management. A qualified issuer is an issuer that holds more than 100 single-family residences. Single-family residence means a one-dwelling-unit home built for one household that functions as independent living space without shared walls or utilities, excluding condominium and cooperative units.
Who Benefits and How
First-time homebuyers, owner-occupant buyers, families seeking single-family homes, local housing markets, and smaller landlords may benefit because the bill limits very large funds from buying single-family houses directly or gaining majority control of companies holding more than 100 such homes. Communities concerned about institutional ownership benefit from a bright-line $100 billion asset threshold and a 49 percent cap on large-fund equity stakes in qualified issuers.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Registered investment companies above the $100 billion threshold, private funds above the threshold, institutional single-family rental investors, and qualified issuers holding more than 100 single-family residences face new acquisition limits. The SEC must interpret and enforce the Investment Company Act amendment. Federal agencies selling single-family residences may lose large-scale fund buyers. Investors may need to monitor asset-management thresholds, home-purchase activity, and equity ownership percentages after the 100-day effective date.
Key Provisions
- Bars large-scale investment companies from purchasing single-family residences beginning 100 days after enactment.
- Applies the purchase ban to single-family homes bought from the federal government.
- Bars large-scale companies from buying qualified-issuer equity when the purchase would push ownership above 49 percent.
- Defines large-scale company as a registered investment company or private fund with more than $100 billion in assets under management.
- Defines qualified issuer as an issuer holding more than 100 single-family residences.
- Defines single-family residence as a one-unit independent home and excludes condominium or cooperative units.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Bars registered investment companies and private funds with more than $100 billion in assets under management from buying single-family residences, including from the federal government, and from buying enough equity in an issuer that owns more than 100 single-family homes to exceed 49 percent ownership, beginning 100 days after enactment.
Key Policy Areas
Housing, Financial Services, Consumers
Primary Purpose
Bars registered investment companies and private funds with more than $100 billion in assets under management from buying single-family residences, including from the federal government, and from buying enough equity in an issuer that owns more than 100 single-family homes to exceed 49 percent ownership, beginning 100 days after enactment.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- First-time homebuyers
- Owner-occupant buyers
- Families seeking single-family homes
- Local housing markets
- Smaller landlords
Identified Costs
- Large registered investment companies
- Large private funds
- Institutional rental investors
- Qualified single-family home issuers
- SEC staff
- Federal home sellers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Introduced in House
Mrs. Miller of Illinois (for herself and Ms. Boebert) introduced …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Families seeking single-family homes, Institutional rental investors, Local housing markets
Positive-direction: Families seeking single-family homes, Local housing markets
Negative-direction: Institutional rental investors, Qualified single-family home issuers
Large private funds, Large registered investment companies, Registered investment companies
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology