Historic Infrastructure Management and Jobs Training Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Historic Infrastructure Management and Jobs Training Act adds a new Historic Preservation Workforce Development grants section to chapter 3029 of title 54. The Interior Secretary establishes a competitive grant program to support workforce training, apprenticeships, and skilled trade development for preservation and conservation of historic properties and objects, including records, archaeological resources, and culturally significant materials. Eligible recipients include States, territories, local governments, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, public or nonprofit organizations with preservation experience, and accredited educational institutions with relevant training programs. Eligible projects must focus on historic properties or cultural resources needing specialized preservation skills because of age, materials, construction methods, or significance. Training may cover historic masonry, timber framing, structural systems, decorative finishes, plaster, tile, ornamental woodwork, metalwork, archival and photographic conservation, archaeological stabilization, documentation, and materials conservation. Skilled-trade projects must comply with Department of Labor apprenticeship standards and applicable collective bargaining agreements. The Secretary prioritizes projects serving high-unemployment areas and places with limited preservation expertise, including rural or underserved communities. Grantees report workforce outcomes such as participant counts and certifications or credentials.
Who Benefits and How
Historic preservation trainees, apprentices, skilled trades workers, rural communities, underserved communities, high-unemployment areas, State governments, local governments, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, preservation nonprofits, and accredited educational institutions benefit from grant funding for specialized preservation skills and career pathways. Historic properties, archaeological resources, archives, and culturally significant objects benefit if more workers are trained to conserve, stabilize, document, and maintain them. Labor apprenticeship systems benefit when skilled-trade projects coordinate with the Office of Apprenticeship.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Interior historic preservation staff must administer a new competitive grant program, set application procedures, track measurable outcomes, and update the title 54 table of contents. Grant recipients must design eligible training projects, comply with apprenticeship standards and collective bargaining agreements when applicable, report participant and credential outcomes, and focus on qualifying historic or cultural resources. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of the grants. Applicants outside priority high-unemployment or underserved areas may be less competitive.
Key Provisions
- Creates a Historic Preservation Workforce Development competitive grant program.
- Authorizes grants for training, apprenticeships, and skilled trade development tied to historic properties, cultural resources, archival materials, and archaeological resources.
- Allows grants to States, territories, local governments, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, preservation nonprofits, and accredited educational institutions.
- Requires skilled-trade projects to comply with Department of Labor apprenticeship standards and applicable collective bargaining agreements.
- Prioritizes projects in high-unemployment areas and places with limited preservation expertise, including rural or underserved communities.
- Requires grantees to report workforce outcomes, including participant counts and preservation-related certifications or credentials.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a Historic Preservation Workforce Development competitive grant program under title 54 to fund training, apprenticeships, and skilled trade development for preserving historic properties, objects, records, archaeological resources, and cultural resources, with eligible recipients including States, local governments, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, preservation nonprofits, and accredited educational institutions, priority for high-unemployment and underserved areas, and outcome reporting on participants and credentials.
Key Policy Areas
Education, Labor, Government
Primary Purpose
Creates a Historic Preservation Workforce Development competitive grant program under title 54 to fund training, apprenticeships, and skilled trade development for preserving historic properties, objects, records, archaeological resources, and cultural resources, with eligible recipients including States, local governments, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, preservation nonprofits, and accredited educational institutions, priority for high-unemployment and underserved areas, and outcome reporting on participants and credentials.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Historic preservation trainees
- Apprentices
- Skilled trades workers
- Rural communities
- Underserved communities
- Indian Tribes
- Native Hawaiian organizations
- Accredited educational institutions
Identified Costs
- Interior historic preservation staff
- Grant recipients
- Federal taxpayers
- Applicants outside priority areas
- Preservation program administrators
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House
Mr. Hernández (for himself and Mr. Soto) introduced the following …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Apprentices, High-unemployment areas, Historic preservation trainees
Grant recipients, Preservation nonprofits
Positive-direction: Preservation nonprofits
Negative-direction: Grant recipients
Accredited educational institutions, Preservation program administrators
Positive-direction: Accredited educational institutions
Negative-direction: Preservation program administrators
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology