HR717-119

In Committee

Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jan 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act creates a federal framework for conserving wildlife movement areas without imposing non-voluntary land-use changes. It defines movement areas, eligible recipients, relevant agencies, and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation role. The main Wildlife Movement and Movement Area Grant Program, administered through a cooperative agreement with NFWF, funds projects that improve or conserve habitat quality in movement areas, including habitat leases, fence modifications, non-federal land acquisition, conservation easements, hydrology work, wildlife-vehicle collision reduction, and road or infrastructure modifications. Federal cost share can reach 90 percent, with at least 10 percent non-federal match and waiver authority for Tribes, historically disadvantaged communities, and persistent-poverty communities. At least half of grant funding must support projects directly conserving, restoring, or enhancing big-game movement areas. The bill also creates a State and Tribal Migration Research Program through USFWS Science Applications, expands Partners for Fish and Wildlife technical assistance, directs USGS mapping and technical assistance, appoints an Interior senior coordinator, requires reports to Congress, and preserves state wildlife authority, Tribal treaty authority, private property, agriculture, forestry, energy, mining, water, public recreation, military readiness, and existing native-species conservation laws.

Who Benefits and How

State wildlife agencies, Tribal wildlife agencies, NFWF, private landowners, conservation nonprofits, county governments, transportation departments, and research universities benefit from grants, research funding, mapping support, and coordination for migration corridors and seasonal habitats. Big-game populations, migratory wildlife, hunters, wildlife viewers, and rural communities benefit if habitat quality, road crossings, fencing, and hydrology projects reduce fragmentation and wildlife-vehicle collisions. Tribes and disadvantaged communities benefit from match-waiver authority and direct migration research support.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Interior, USDA, DOT, USFWS, USGS, NFWF, State agencies, Tribal agencies, and eligible recipients must administer grants, verify movement-area science, secure written State or Tribal support, provide matching funds unless waived, report biennially, protect sensitive species-location and private-property information, coordinate across agencies, and manage project oversight. Federal taxpayers bear the authorized costs. Landowners, agricultural operators, forestry operators, energy developers, mining interests, military installations, and recreation users gain savings-clause protections but may still need to coordinate voluntarily with funded connectivity projects.

Key Provisions

  • Creates a NFWF-administered Wildlife Movement and Movement Area Grant Program for habitat connectivity projects.
  • Authorizes grants for habitat leases, fence modifications, land acquisition, conservation easements, hydrology, wildlife crossings, and infrastructure modifications.
  • Requires State or Tribal wildlife agency support and provides up to 90 percent federal cost share with selected match waivers.
  • Creates a State and Tribal Migration Research Program through USFWS Science Applications.
  • Expands Partners for Fish and Wildlife technical assistance and directs USGS corridor mapping support.
  • Requires interagency coordination, congressional reports, sensitive-data protections, and savings clauses for property, Tribal, state, agriculture, recreation, military, and existing-law interests.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates and coordinates federal partnership tools for wildlife movement areas, including a NFWF-administered matching grant program for habitat connectivity projects, direct State and Tribal migration research funding, expanded Partners for Fish and Wildlife technical assistance, USGS corridor mapping, interagency coordination led by an Interior senior official, and savings clauses protecting voluntary land-use, property, Tribal, hunting, recreation, military-readiness, and state wildlife authorities.

Key Policy Areas

Environment, Agriculture, Transportation

Primary Purpose

Creates and coordinates federal partnership tools for wildlife movement areas, including a NFWF-administered matching grant program for habitat connectivity projects, direct State and Tribal migration research funding, expanded Partners for Fish and Wildlife technical assistance, USGS corridor mapping, interagency coordination led by an Interior senior official, and savings clauses protecting voluntary land-use, property, Tribal, hunting, recreation, military-readiness, and state wildlife authorities.

Policy Domains

Environment Agriculture Transportation

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • State wildlife agencies
  • Tribal wildlife agencies
  • NFWF
  • Private landowners
  • Conservation nonprofits
  • County governments
  • Transportation departments
  • Migratory wildlife
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
NFWF: , , , , , , ,
County governments: , , , , , , ,
Migratory wildlife: , , , , , , ,
Private landowners: , , , , , , ,
Conservation nonprofits: , , , , , , ,
State wildlife agencies: , , , , , , ,
Tribal wildlife agencies: , , , , , , ,
Transportation departments: , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Interior Department staff
  • USDA staff
  • DOT staff
  • USFWS staff
  • USGS mapping staff
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Grant recipients
  • Project sponsors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DOT staff: , , , , , , ,
USDA staff: , , , , , , ,
USFWS staff: , , , , , , ,
Grant recipients: , , , , , , ,
Project sponsors: , , , , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , , , , ,
USGS mapping staff: , , , , , , ,
Interior Department staff: , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 23, 2025

Mr. Zinke (for himself and Mr. Beyer) introduced the following …

Jan 23, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Jan 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
10 mentions across 7 clauses
+2 positive -8 negative

Congressional natural-resource committees, Federal conservation agencies, Interior budget staff

Positive-direction: Congressional natural-resource committees, Federal conservation agencies

Negative-direction: Interior budget staff, Interior grant staff, Interior senior coordinator, Relevant federal agencies, USFWS Science Applications, USFWS staff, USGS mapping staff

State & Local Government
9 mentions across 8 clauses
+9 positive

County governments, State wildlife agencies

Tribal Nations
9 mentions across 9 clauses
+9 positive

Tribal governments, Tribal land managers, Tribal wildlife agencies

Non-Profit Institutions
7 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive -1 negative

Conservation nonprofits, Grant applicants, Grant recipients

Positive-direction: Conservation nonprofits, Grant applicants, NFWF

Negative-direction: Grant recipients

Environment
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive -1 negative

Federal land managers, Migratory wildlife, Wildlife movement programs

Federal land managers faces effects in multiple directions

Agriculture
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+5 positive

Agricultural operators, Private landowners

Taxpayers
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-4 negative

Taxpayers

Research & Science
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Wildlife migration researchers

10/11
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Environment Agriculture Transportation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology