Abolish ICE Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Abolish ICE Act makes findings criticizing ICE's mission, enforcement practices, raids, deaths, detention conditions, citizen detentions, and use in major cities. Its operative section begins on enactment by barring federal funds from being made available to carry out any functions, duties, or responsibilities assigned or delegated to the ICE Director under the Homeland Security Act or any other law. It rescinds unobligated balances available to the ICE Director as of the day before enactment. It transfers ICE assets and liabilities to the Secretary of Homeland Security. ICE is then abolished 90 days after enactment. The bill does not specify a replacement structure for immigration detention, removal, investigations, customs enforcement, or Homeland Security Investigations work; those functions would need to be handled through the funding bar, asset transfer, and DHS reorganization choices.
Who Benefits and How
Immigrant communities, immigration-rights organizations, civil-liberties advocates, local governments opposing ICE deployments, and people in ICE detention benefit from a direct end to ICE as an agency and a cutoff of funds for ICE-directed functions. DHS leadership benefits from receiving ICE assets and liabilities rather than leaving them without a statutory custodian.
Who Bears the Burden and How
ICE employees, ICE contractors, detention facility operators, immigration prosecutors, DHS leadership, federal budgeting staff, law enforcement partners, and people relying on existing ICE case systems face major disruption. DHS must absorb assets and liabilities, manage rescinded balances, decide what happens to pending enforcement and detention operations, handle employee transitions, and reorganize any lawful functions that Congress leaves elsewhere.
Key Provisions
- Bars federal funds from being used for ICE Director functions, duties, or responsibilities beginning on enactment.
- Rescinds unobligated balances made available to the ICE Director as of the day before enactment.
- Transfers ICE assets and liabilities to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
- Abolishes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 90 days after enactment.
- Provides findings criticizing ICE enforcement, detention conditions, raids, deaths, and citizen detentions.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Abolishes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 90 days after enactment, bars federal funds for ICE functions beginning on enactment, rescinds unobligated balances available to the ICE Director, and transfers ICE assets and liabilities to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Key Policy Areas
Immigration, Law Enforcement, Government
Primary Purpose
Abolishes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 90 days after enactment, bars federal funds for ICE functions beginning on enactment, rescinds unobligated balances available to the ICE Director, and transfers ICE assets and liabilities to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Immigrant communities
- Immigration-rights organizations
- Civil-liberties advocates
- Local governments opposing ICE deployments
- People in ICE detention
Identified Costs
- ICE employees
- ICE contractors
- Detention facility operators
- DHS leadership
- Federal budgeting staff
- Law enforcement partners
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …
Introduced in House
Mr. Thanedar introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Immigrant communities, People in ICE detention
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology