Ensuring Consistency in Nutrition Labels Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Ensuring Consistency in Nutrition Labels Act amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act nutrition-labeling rules. If HHS determines that a composite nutrient content value required on a food label under section 403(q)(1)(C), (D), or (E) is more than 5 percent above the declared label value, the food is treated as misbranded. Within 60 days after enactment, HHS acting through the FDA Commissioner must revise 21 C.F.R. 101.9 to reflect the new 5 percent deviation rule. The bill tightens tolerance for understated nutrient values on labels and gives FDA a short deadline to update its nutrition-labeling regulation.
Who Benefits and How
Consumers tracking calories, sodium, sugar, fat, or other required nutrients, nutrition researchers, dietitians, people managing chronic disease, and competitors with accurate labels benefit because foods with nutrient values more than 5 percent above labels become misbranded. FDA enforcement staff benefit from a clear statutory threshold.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Food manufacturers, packaged-food brands, nutrition-labeling consultants, testing laboratories, importers, and FDA rulemaking staff must update testing, label verification, quality control, and regulatory text within the 60-day implementation window. Companies with labels understating required nutrients by more than 5 percent face misbranding risk, recalls, relabeling, enforcement, and compliance costs.
Key Provisions
- Tightens nutrition-label accuracy by treating covered foods as misbranded when required nutrient values exceed declared values by more than 5 percent.
- Applies the threshold to nutrient values required under section 403(q)(1)(C), (D), and (E) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
- Requires HHS, through FDA, to revise 21 C.F.R. 101.9 within 60 days.
- Creates enforcement risk for manufacturers whose nutrition labels understate covered nutrient content.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Treats food as misbranded when required nutrient values exceed declared label values by more than 5 percent and requires FDA to revise nutrition-label regulations within 60 days.
Key Policy Areas
Food & Beverage, Healthcare, Consumer Protection
Primary Purpose
Treats food as misbranded when required nutrient values exceed declared label values by more than 5 percent and requires FDA to revise nutrition-label regulations within 60 days.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Consumers tracking nutrients
- Dietitians
- People managing chronic disease
- Nutrition researchers
- FDA enforcement staff
- Accurate-label competitors
Identified Costs
- Food manufacturers
- Packaged-food brands
- Nutrition-labeling consultants
- Testing laboratories
- Food importers
- FDA rulemaking staff
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Mr. Steube (for himself, Mr. Soto, and Mr. Donalds) introduced …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Food manufacturers, Packaged-food brands, Testing laboratories
Positive-direction: Testing laboratories
Negative-direction: Food manufacturers, Packaged-food brands
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology