HR710-119

In Committee

Regulation Decimation Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Regulation Decimation Act creates a ten-for-one regulatory repeal requirement for agencies. An agency may not issue a rule unless it repeals ten or more related rules to the extent practicable. For a major rule, the agency must repeal ten or more related rules and the cost of the new major rule must be less than or equal to the cost of the repealed rules, with the OIRA Administrator certifying the cost comparison. Repealed rules must be published in the Federal Register. The requirement applies to rules and major rules that impose costs or responsibilities on nongovernmental persons or state or local governments. It does not apply to agency internal policy or procurement rules, or to revisions that make a rule less burdensome by reducing requirements or compliance costs. Within 90 days, every agency head must report to Congress and OMB on rules that are costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated and list unnecessary restrictions. Within five years, the President must report to Congress on the number of rules in effect and reduction status.

Who Benefits and How

Regulated businesses, small businesses, state governments, local governments, tribal governments, and compliance officers benefit if agencies must offset new burdens by repealing multiple existing rules and keeping major-rule costs at or below repeal savings. OIRA analysts and Congress benefit from new reporting on outdated, duplicative, ineffective, and costly rules.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal agencies, program offices, agency lawyers, OIRA economists, Federal Register staff, and public-interest groups that favor new protections face major procedural burdens. Agencies must identify ten repeal candidates, estimate costs, publish repeals, obtain OIRA certification for major rules, and prepare reports before issuing cost-imposing rules. Beneficiaries of existing health, safety, labor, consumer, environmental, or civil-rights rules may bear risk if protective rules are repealed to permit new rules.

Key Provisions

  • Requires agencies to repeal ten or more related rules before issuing a new cost-imposing rule.
  • Requires major rules to be cost-neutral or cost-reducing compared with the rules repealed.
  • Requires OIRA certification that a new major rule costs no more than the repealed rules.
  • Requires repealed rules to be published in the Federal Register.
  • Exempts internal agency policy, procurement rules, and revisions that reduce burdens or compliance costs.
  • Requires 90-day agency reports and a five-year presidential report on regulatory reduction.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires agencies to repeal at least ten related rules before issuing a new cost-imposing rule, requires major rules to be cost-neutral against repealed rules with OIRA certification, and mandates agency and presidential reports on costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated regulations.

Key Policy Areas

Government, Small Business, State & Local Government

Primary Purpose

Requires agencies to repeal at least ten related rules before issuing a new cost-imposing rule, requires major rules to be cost-neutral against repealed rules with OIRA certification, and mandates agency and presidential reports on costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated regulations.

Policy Domains

Government Small Business State & Local Government

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Regulated businesses
  • Small businesses
  • State governments
  • Local governments
  • Tribal governments
  • OIRA analysts
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
OIRA analysts:
Small businesses:
Local governments:
State governments:
Tribal governments:
Regulated businesses:
Congressional oversight committees:
Identified Costs
  • Federal agencies
  • Agency lawyers
  • OIRA economists
  • Federal Register staff
  • Public-interest groups
  • Beneficiaries of existing protective rules
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Agency lawyers:
OIRA economists:
Federal agencies:
Federal Register staff:
Public-interest groups:
Beneficiaries of existing protective rules:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 23, 2025

Mr. Taylor (for himself, Mr. Harris of North Carolina, Mr. …

Jan 23, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and …

Jan 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
-3 negative

Federal Register staff, Federal agencies, OIRA economists

Small Business
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Regulated businesses, Small businesses

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

State governments

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Beneficiaries of existing protective rules

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Small Business State & Local Government

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology