To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill repeals subsection 13(p) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the SEC conflict-minerals disclosure requirement. It also strikes section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and removes the table-of-contents entry for that section.
The conflict-minerals rule requires certain public companies to disclose whether tin, tantalum, tungsten, or gold in their products may have originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries and to conduct related country-of-origin or due-diligence work. Repeal would end that federal disclosure obligation for covered SEC issuers.
Who Benefits and How
Public companies subject to conflict-minerals disclosure benefit because they would no longer need to prepare SEC conflict-minerals filings under section 13(p). Mineral supply-chain firms benefit from reduced customer pressure for Dodd-Frank due-diligence documentation. Manufacturers using covered minerals benefit if compliance costs and sourcing reviews decline. SEC disclosure staff benefit from no longer administering that rule. Some suppliers in covered mineral markets may benefit if buyers face less pressure to avoid conflict-linked sourcing.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Investors relying on conflict-minerals disclosures lose a standardized SEC source of supply-chain risk information. Watchdog organizations lose a disclosure hook for tracking conflict-linked mineral sourcing. Communities affected by conflict-linked mineral extraction may lose leverage created by public-company due-diligence pressure. Responsible-sourcing programs may face weaker demand if issuers no longer need Dodd-Frank disclosures. Consumers seeking conflict-mineral information may have fewer comparable public filings.
Key Provisions
- Repeals Securities Exchange Act section 13(p), the conflict-minerals disclosure provision.
- Repeals Dodd-Frank section 1502.
- Modifies the Dodd-Frank table of contents by removing the conflict-minerals item.
- Provides covered public companies relief from SEC conflict-minerals reporting and due-diligence obligations.
- Reduces the federal disclosure tools available to investors, watchdogs, and communities concerned about conflict-linked mineral sourcing.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Repeals the Securities Exchange Act conflict-minerals disclosure regime and removes Dodd-Frank section 1502, reducing reporting and due-diligence burdens for public companies and mineral supply-chain firms while removing disclosure tools used by investors, watchdogs, and communities concerned about conflict-linked mineral sourcing.
Key Policy Areas
Securities Regulation, Mining, Supply Chains, Human Rights
Primary Purpose
Repeals the Securities Exchange Act conflict-minerals disclosure regime and removes Dodd-Frank section 1502, reducing reporting and due-diligence burdens for public companies and mineral supply-chain firms while removing disclosure tools used by investors, watchdogs, and communities concerned about conflict-linked mineral sourcing.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Public companies subject to conflict-minerals disclosure
- Mineral supply-chain firms
- Manufacturers using covered minerals
- SEC disclosure staff
- Suppliers in covered mineral markets
Identified Costs
- Investors relying on conflict-minerals disclosures
- Watchdog organizations
- Communities affected by conflict-linked mineral extraction
- Responsible-sourcing programs
- Consumers seeking conflict-mineral information
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedPlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 481.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. …
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Mr. Huizenga introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Public companies subject to conflict-minerals disclosure
Investors relying on conflict-minerals disclosures
Communities affected by conflict-linked mineral extraction
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "sec"
- → Securities and Exchange Commission
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology