HR7066-119

In Committee

SHIELD Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 14, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The SHIELD Act amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create new standards for large load facilities. Large load facilities are treated as a separate class of electric consumers. Each electric utility serving that class must fully recover from that class all costs associated with generation, transmission, and distribution upgrades needed to meet large-load demand, including if a large load facility shuts down or uses less electricity than projected. Electric utilities must prioritize service requests from large load owners or operators that agree to use features reducing grid demand during peak periods, including energy efficiency, conservation, onsite storage, demand response, or load flexibility, and that agree to meet all of the facility's electricity demand with zero-emission power generated onsite or procured within the same balancing authority through a power purchase agreement.

Who Benefits and How

Residential ratepayers, small businesses, existing utility customers, State utility commissions, grid reliability planners, and utilities benefit because the bill aims to keep large new loads from shifting grid-upgrade costs onto other customer classes. Large load facilities that use energy efficiency, storage, demand response, load flexibility, and same-balancing-authority zero-emission power benefit from priority in the interconnection or service queue. Zero-emission power developers and battery storage providers may benefit from demand created by large load compliance strategies.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Large load facilities, data centers, industrial electrification projects, cryptocurrency mining operations, large manufacturing loads, and utilities serving those customers bear the burden of cost allocation, service-class treatment, documentation, and operational commitments. Utilities must calculate upgrade costs, recover them from the large load class, prioritize qualifying requests, and manage stranded-cost risk if projected loads do not materialize. State utility regulators must consider or implement the new PURPA standards.

Key Provisions

  • Creates a PURPA large load facility class for electric consumers.
  • Requires utilities to recover generation, transmission, and distribution upgrade costs from the large load class.
  • Requires cost recovery even when a large load facility ceases operations or uses less electricity than projected.
  • Requires utilities to prioritize large load service requests that reduce peak demand.
  • Requires priority requests to use energy efficiency, conservation, onsite storage, demand response, or load flexibility.
  • Requires priority requests to meet all facility demand with onsite or same-balancing-authority zero-emission electricity.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires State utility regulators and nonregulated electric utilities under PURPA to treat large load facilities as a separate electric-consumer class, require utilities to recover grid-upgrade costs from that class, and prioritize service requests from large loads that reduce peak demand and meet their demand with same-balancing-authority zero-emission electricity.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Utilities, Technology

Primary Purpose

Requires State utility regulators and nonregulated electric utilities under PURPA to treat large load facilities as a separate electric-consumer class, require utilities to recover grid-upgrade costs from that class, and prioritize service requests from large loads that reduce peak demand and meet their demand with same-balancing-authority zero-emission electricity.

Policy Domains

Energy Utilities Technology

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Residential ratepayers
  • Small businesses
  • Existing utility customers
  • State utility commissions
  • Grid reliability planners
  • Zero-emission power developers
  • Battery storage providers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Small businesses:
Residential ratepayers:
Battery storage providers:
Grid reliability planners:
State utility commissions:
Existing utility customers:
Zero-emission power developers:
Identified Costs
  • Large load facilities
  • Data center operators
  • Industrial electricity users
  • Cryptocurrency mining companies
  • Electric utilities
  • State utility regulators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Electric utilities:
Data center operators:
Large load facilities:
State utility regulators:
Industrial electricity users:
Cryptocurrency mining companies:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 14, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jan 14, 2026

Introduced in House

Jan 14, 2026

Mr. Levin (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Quigley, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Utilities
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Electric utilities, State utility commissions

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Residential ratepayers

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Data center operators

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Large load facilities

Energy
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Zero-emission power developers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Utilities Technology

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology