HR706-119

Passed House

To improve the biodetection functions of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 12, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The DHS Biodetection Improvement Act directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to assess how DHS has used Department of Energy national laboratories and sites for research and development supporting DHS missions. Within 180 days, the Secretary must submit that assessment to the House Homeland Security Committee and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, together with a strategy for conducting DHS biodetection R&D in coordination with DOE labs and sites.

The required strategy must identify biodetection technologies that can meet DHS capability and requirements documents, informed by GAO studies such as the November 2021 Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office BioWatch collector-network reassessment. It must develop an acquisition and procurement plan to provide those technologies to existing BioWatch jurisdictions under federal acquisition rules and DHS procurement directives. It must require periodic external evaluations to identify gaps and failure points and recommend contingency plans if technologies fail. It also must support future environmental biodetection requirements in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal governments, universities, and private-sector partners. DHS must provide Congress a one-year update on the assessment, strategy, and implementation challenges.

Who Benefits and How

BioWatch jurisdictions, DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office staff, DOE national laboratories, biodetection technology vendors, state public-health agencies, local emergency-management agencies, tribal governments, research universities, private-sector biodefense partners, House Homeland Security Committee staff, and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee staff benefit because the bill forces DHS to connect lab research, procurement planning, external evaluation, and contingency planning to real biodetection mission needs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secretary of Homeland Security, DHS biodetection program managers, DHS acquisition officials, DOE laboratory liaison staff, external evaluators, BioWatch program administrators, and participating government partners bear compliance burdens because they must complete the assessment, write the strategy, identify technologies, develop procurement plans, conduct evaluations, define future requirements, and brief Congress on implementation challenges.

Key Provisions

  • Requires DHS to assess its use of DOE national laboratories and sites for biodetection research and development.
  • Requires a congressional assessment and strategy within 180 days.
  • Requires identification of biodetection technologies that meet DHS mission needs and BioWatch-related requirements.
  • Requires an acquisition and procurement plan for existing BioWatch jurisdictions.
  • Requires periodic external evaluations, gap identification, failure-point analysis, and contingency plans.
  • Requires partnership with federal, state, local, tribal, university, and private-sector partners on future environmental biodetection requirements.
  • Requires a one-year congressional update on the strategy and implementation challenges.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires DHS to assess how it uses Department of Energy national laboratories for biodetection research, submit the assessment and a strategy within 180 days, identify BioWatch-relevant technologies, plan acquisition for existing jurisdictions, require external evaluations and contingency plans, and update Congress after one year.

Key Policy Areas

Homeland Security, Biodefense, Research and Development, Government Procurement

Primary Purpose

Requires DHS to assess how it uses Department of Energy national laboratories for biodetection research, submit the assessment and a strategy within 180 days, identify BioWatch-relevant technologies, plan acquisition for existing jurisdictions, require external evaluations and contingency plans, and update Congress after one year.

Policy Domains

Homeland Security Biodefense Research and Development Government Procurement

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • BioWatch jurisdictions
  • DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office staff
  • DOE national laboratories
  • Biodetection technology vendors
  • State public-health agencies
  • Local emergency-management agencies
  • Tribal governments
  • Research universities
  • Private-sector biodefense partners
  • House Homeland Security Committee staff
  • Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Tribal governments:
Research universities:
BioWatch jurisdictions:
DOE national laboratories:
State public-health agencies:
Biodetection technology vendors:
Private-sector biodefense partners:
Local emergency-management agencies:
House Homeland Security Committee staff:
DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office staff:
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee staff:
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
  • DHS biodetection program managers
  • DHS acquisition officials
  • DOE laboratory liaison staff
  • External evaluators
  • BioWatch program administrators
  • Participating government partners
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
External evaluators:
DHS acquisition officials:
DOE laboratory liaison staff:
Secretary of Homeland Security:
BioWatch program administrators:
DHS biodetection program managers:
Participating government partners:

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 12, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland …

Mar 12, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jan 23, 2025

Mr. Strong (for himself and Mr. Higgins of Louisiana) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

DHS acquisition officials, DHS biodetection program managers, Tribal governments

Positive-direction: Tribal governments

Negative-direction: DHS acquisition officials, DHS biodetection program managers

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Local emergency-management agencies, State public-health agencies

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

BioWatch jurisdictions

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

DOE national laboratories

Pharmaceuticals
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Biodetection technology vendors

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

External evaluators

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Homeland Security Biodefense Research and Development Government Procurement
Actor Mappings
"dhs"
→ Department of Homeland Security
"doe"
→ Department of Energy
"cwmd"
→ Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office
"biowatch"
→ BioWatch biodetection program

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology