PROTECT Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The PROTECT Act repeals section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. That repeal would remove the federal rule that generally prevents interactive computer services from being treated as the publisher or speaker of third-party content and remove the related protection for good-faith content moderation. The bill preserves a definition of interactive computer service by placing it in section 223(i) of the Communications Act, covering information services, systems, or access software providers that enable computer access by multiple users, including internet access systems operated by libraries or educational institutions. It then updates many statutes that referred to section 230, including obscenity provisions in title 18, sex-trafficking provisions, controlled-substances provisions, trademark law, defamation-related judgment rules, the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act, unlawful internet gambling definitions, and NTIA provisions. The conforming amendments take effect upon enactment.
Who Benefits and How
Plaintiffs harmed by online defamation, harassment, illegal sales, fraud, sex trafficking facilitation, or other third-party content benefit because a major federal immunity defense would disappear. Traditional publishers and media companies benefit from a more similar liability environment between online platforms and offline publishers. State attorneys, civil rights organizations, child safety advocates, and victims' attorneys may benefit from additional leverage against platforms that host or amplify harmful third-party material.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Large online platforms, social media services, search engines, web hosts, online marketplaces, small websites, forums, libraries, and educational institutions that operate interactive computer services face greater litigation exposure and compliance costs. Content moderation teams must reassess policies without the section 230 safe harbor. Internet users and online creators may face more removed content, fewer forum spaces, or stricter verification as services reduce legal risk. Courts may see more claims that previously would have been dismissed under section 230.
Key Provisions
- Repeals section 230 of the Communications Act and removes its liability protections.
- Preserves an interactive computer service definition in section 223(i) of the Communications Act.
- Amends criminal obscenity, sex-trafficking, controlled-substances, trademark, defamation, judicial security, gambling, and NTIA statutes to remove section 230 cross-references.
- Removes statutory language that treated certain moderation actions as protected under section 230.
- Applies the conforming amendments immediately upon enactment.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Repeals section 230 of the Communications Act, removes the publisher-liability and content-moderation safe harbors for interactive computer services, and makes conforming amendments across communications, trademark, copyright, criminal, controlled-substances, defamation, judicial security, internet gambling, and NTIA statutes.
Key Policy Areas
Technology, Telecommunications, Law Enforcement
Primary Purpose
Repeals section 230 of the Communications Act, removes the publisher-liability and content-moderation safe harbors for interactive computer services, and makes conforming amendments across communications, trademark, copyright, criminal, controlled-substances, defamation, judicial security, internet gambling, and NTIA statutes.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Plaintiffs harmed by online content
- Traditional publishers
- Victims attorneys
- Child safety advocates
- State attorneys general
Identified Costs
- Large online platforms
- Small websites
- Online marketplaces
- Libraries offering internet access
- Educational institutions offering internet access
- Content moderation teams
- Federal courts
Sponsors
Jimmy Patronis
R-FL | Primary Sponsor
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Patronis introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Content moderation teams, Large online platforms, Small websites
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology