HR7-119

In Committee

No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jan 22, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025 writes a broad abortion-funding restriction into title 1 of the U.S. Code. Federal funds, including federal trust-fund dollars, may not be spent on abortions or on health benefits coverage that includes abortion coverage. Federal facilities and federally employed clinicians may not furnish abortion services within federal employment, subject to exceptions. The bill preserves privately funded separate abortion coverage and allows non-federal insurers, States, and localities to offer or buy abortion coverage if only non-federal money is used and Medicaid matching funds are not used. It preserves other federal abortion-funding limits, allows treatment of infections, injuries, diseases, or disorders caused or exacerbated by abortions, and exempts abortions where pregnancy results from rape or incest or where a physician certifies that the woman would otherwise be in danger of death. The bill treats District of Columbia funds approved by Congress as federal funds for this chapter. It also changes ACA tax rules so premium tax credits, advance payments, small-business health insurance credits, and multi-State qualified health plans cannot subsidize abortion-inclusive plans except for permitted exceptions. Finally, it revises ACA notice rules requiring plans and Exchanges to disclose abortion coverage and any separate abortion surcharge in enrollment, marketing, comparison, and summary materials.

Who Benefits and How

Taxpayers and voters who oppose federal abortion funding benefit because the bill makes restrictions permanent and applies them across federal appropriations, trust funds, health plans, facilities, employees, ACA subsidies, and the District of Columbia budget. Federal and State administrators benefit from a single statutory title that defines the funding rule and exceptions. Consumers shopping for ACA plans benefit from prominent disclosure of abortion coverage and separate surcharge information. Insurers that want to offer privately funded separate abortion coverage benefit because the bill preserves that market outside federal subsidy dollars.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Women seeking abortion services bear the burden because federal facilities, federally employed clinicians, federally subsidized plans, ACA premium credits, and small-business credits cannot support most abortion care or abortion-inclusive coverage. Abortion providers and reproductive-health clinics may lose federally supported patient volume. Health insurers, ACA Exchanges, small-business plan sponsors, and federal health programs must separate coverage, premium, credit, surcharge, marketing, and disclosure systems. District of Columbia budget officials must treat congressionally approved D.C. funds as federal funds for these restrictions. Federal facility administrators and clinicians must train staff on exceptions for rape, incest, life endangerment, and treatment of complications.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits federal funds and federal trust-fund dollars from paying for abortions.
  • Prohibits federal funds from paying for health benefits coverage that includes abortion coverage.
  • Limits abortion services furnished by federal facilities and federally employed clinicians.
  • Permits separate abortion coverage only when paid entirely with non-federal funds and without Medicaid matching funds.
  • Exempts rape, incest, life-endangering physical conditions, and treatment of abortion-related complications.
  • Applies the funding rule to the District of Columbia budget approved by Congress.
  • Bars ACA premium tax credits, advance payments, small-business credits, and multi-State plans from subsidizing abortion-inclusive coverage.
  • Requires prominent disclosure of abortion coverage and separate abortion surcharges in ACA plan materials.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Codifies a permanent federal funding restriction on abortions and abortion-inclusive health coverage, extends the rule to federal facilities, federal employees, ACA premium credits, small-business credits, and the District of Columbia budget, while preserving exceptions for rape, incest, life endangerment, separate privately funded coverage, and treatment of abortion complications.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Tax, Insurance, Government

Primary Purpose

Codifies a permanent federal funding restriction on abortions and abortion-inclusive health coverage, extends the rule to federal facilities, federal employees, ACA premium credits, small-business credits, and the District of Columbia budget, while preserving exceptions for rape, incest, life endangerment, separate privately funded coverage, and treatment of abortion complications.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Tax Insurance Government

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Taxpayers opposed to federal abortion funding
  • ACA consumers comparing plan coverage
  • Federal health program administrators
  • State insurance regulators
  • Insurers offering separate abortion coverage
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State insurance regulators: , , , , , , ,
ACA consumers comparing plan coverage: , , , , , , ,
Federal health program administrators: , , , , , , ,
Insurers offering separate abortion coverage: , , , , , , ,
Taxpayers opposed to federal abortion funding: , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Women seeking abortion services
  • Abortion providers
  • Reproductive-health clinics
  • Health insurers on ACA Exchanges
  • ACA Exchange administrators
  • Small-business health plan sponsors
  • District of Columbia budget officials
  • Federal facility administrators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Abortion providers: , , , , , , ,
ACA Exchange administrators: , , , , , , ,
Reproductive-health clinics: , , , , , , ,
Federal facility administrators: , , , , , , ,
Women seeking abortion services: , , , , , , ,
Health insurers on ACA Exchanges: , , , , , , ,
Small-business health plan sponsors: , , , , , , ,
District of Columbia budget officials: , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 22, 2025

Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mrs. Harshbarger, Ms. …

Jan 22, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …

Jan 22, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

General Public
10 mentions across 9 clauses
+4 positive -6 negative

Consumers shopping for health insurance, D.C. residents seeking abortion services, Individuals receiving ACA premium tax credits

Positive-direction: Consumers shopping for health insurance, Women experiencing medical complications from abortion, Women whose pregnancy results from rape or incest, Women with life-threatening pregnancy conditions

Negative-direction: D.C. residents seeking abortion services, Individuals receiving ACA premium tax credits, Women enrolled in federal health programs, Women receiving care at federal facilities, Women seeking abortion services

Financial Services
7 mentions across 6 clauses
+3 positive -4 negative

Health insurers offering abortion-inclusive plans, Health insurers offering separate abortion coverage, Health insurers on ACA exchanges

Positive-direction: Health insurers offering separate abortion coverage, Non-federal health insurance providers

Negative-direction: Health insurers offering abortion-inclusive plans, Health insurers on ACA exchanges, Health insurers participating in federal programs

Ambulatory Health Care Services
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+2 positive -3 negative

Abortion providers and clinics, Abortion providers in the District of Columbia, Healthcare providers in emergency situations

Positive-direction: Healthcare providers in emergency situations, Healthcare providers treating abortion complications

Negative-direction: Abortion providers and clinics, Abortion providers in the District of Columbia

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative ?1 uncertain

District of Columbia government, Local government health plan administrators, State Medicaid program administrators

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

ACA Health Insurance Exchanges, Federal healthcare facilities, Federal healthcare facilities (VA hospitals, military medical centers, IHS facilities)

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Individuals buying abortion coverage with private funds

Small Business
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Small businesses using Section 45R health insurance credits

14/14
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Tax Insurance Government

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology