HR6992-119

In Committee

EB–5 Regional Center Program Advisory Committee Authorization Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 9, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The EB-5 Regional Center Program Advisory Committee Authorization Act adds a new advisory committee section to the Homeland Security Act. USCIS must establish an EB-5 Regional Center Program Advisory Committee that advises the USCIS Director, develops program-improvement recommendations, submits annual and periodic reports, and gives quarterly briefings to Judiciary and Appropriations Committees. The committee can have up to 35 members appointed by the Homeland Security Secretary, including representatives of Federal, State, local, and Tribal governments and EB-5 regional centers in good standing from categories such as high-unemployment, rural, infrastructure, and Census regions. Recommendations must be approved by a majority before annual submission and cannot be petition- or case-specific. The bill requires subcommittees, meeting and vacancy procedures, conflict-of-interest rules, limits on compensation, public annual-report publication within six months, and termination when all EB-5 Regional Center Program benefits have been adjudicated.

Who Benefits and How

EB-5 regional centers benefit because the bill gives them a formal advisory channel to recommend operational improvements to USCIS. State, local, Tribal, and federal economic-development officials benefit from seats in discussions about regional-center categories, rural and high-unemployment projects, infrastructure projects, and geographic representation. USCIS leadership and Congress benefit from annual reports, subcommittee findings, public versions of reports, and quarterly briefings that can identify processing, policy, and integrity issues. Foreign immigrant investors and project sponsors may benefit if recommendations improve program administration without case-specific intervention.

Who Bears the Burden and How

USCIS EB-5 program staff must establish and manage the committee, appoint members, run meetings, review recommendations, publish public reports, brief Congress quarterly, support subcommittees, and police conflicts. Homeland Security officials must approve appointments and individual representatives. Advisory Committee members must comply with membership categories, conflict rules, compensation limits, and reporting procedures. Regional centers may gain influence but cannot seek petition- or case-specific recommendations, and the agency must ensure the committee does not conflict with EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act limits.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes an EB-5 Regional Center Program Advisory Committee within USCIS.
  • Requires the committee to advise, consult, report, and recommend improvements to the USCIS Director.
  • Requires annual reports, public report versions, and quarterly briefings to Judiciary and Appropriations Committees.
  • Requires membership from government representatives and EB-5 regional centers in good standing across specified categories.
  • Bars petition- or case-specific recommendations and preserves consistency with the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates an EB-5 Regional Center Program Advisory Committee inside USCIS to advise, report, and recommend improvements on the EB-5 Regional Center Program, with regional-center and government representatives, subcommittees, annual reports, quarterly congressional briefings, conflict rules, and public transparency requirements.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Real Estate, Government, Economic Development

Primary Purpose

Creates an EB-5 Regional Center Program Advisory Committee inside USCIS to advise, report, and recommend improvements on the EB-5 Regional Center Program, with regional-center and government representatives, subcommittees, annual reports, quarterly congressional briefings, conflict rules, and public transparency requirements.

Policy Domains

Immigration Real Estate Government Economic Development

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • EB-5 regional centers
  • USCIS leadership
  • State economic-development officials
  • Local government representatives
  • Tribal government representatives
  • Foreign immigrant investors
  • Congressional Judiciary Committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
USCIS leadership: ,
EB-5 regional centers: ,
Foreign immigrant investors: ,
Local government representatives: ,
Tribal government representatives: ,
Congressional Judiciary Committees: ,
State economic-development officials: ,
Identified Costs
  • USCIS EB-5 program staff
  • Homeland Security appointment officials
  • Advisory Committee members
  • Regional center compliance teams
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
USCIS EB-5 program staff: ,
Advisory Committee members: ,
Regional center compliance teams: ,
Homeland Security appointment officials: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 9, 2026

Mr. Stanton (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Liccardo, and Mr. …

Jan 9, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Jan 9, 2026

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -3 negative

Congressional Judiciary Committees, Homeland Security appointment officials, USCIS EB-5 program staff

Positive-direction: Congressional Judiciary Committees

Negative-direction: Homeland Security appointment officials, USCIS EB-5 program staff

Real Estate
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

EB-5 regional centers

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Local government representatives, State economic-development officials

Tribal Nations
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Tribal government representatives

Foreign Entities
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Foreign immigrant investors

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Advisory Committee members

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Real Estate Government Economic Development

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology