HR6931-119

In Committee

Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Dec 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act resolves the Nation’s water-rights claims in Arizona, including the Verde River Watershed and Colorado River-related claims, while recognizing the cultural and religious value of the Verde River. It ratifies the June 26, 2024 settlement agreement and directs Interior to perform federal obligations. Reclamation must plan, design, and construct the Tú ńlį́į́níchoh Water Infrastructure Project, including the Cragin-Verde Pipeline Project and the Yavapai-Apache Nation Drinking Water System Project. The pipeline must deliver at least 6,836.92 acre-feet per year from C.C. Cragin Dam and Reservoir for the Nation and up to 1,912.18 acre-feet per year for Yavapai County water users. The bill creates a project fund, a Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Settlement Trust Fund with accounts for implementation, water projects, wastewater projects, operation and maintenance, and watershed rehabilitation, keeps a USGS gage at the Verde River point of compliance, transfers indexed federal amounts including $731.059 million for the Cragin-Verde Pipeline Account and $152.49 million for the drinking-water system, establishes waivers and releases of water claims, adds specified parcels to trust land, amends CAP water delivery arrangements, and makes the settlement enforceable only after specified funding, judgments, agreements, water rights, and Federal Register findings are complete.

Who Benefits and How

The Yavapai-Apache Nation benefits from quantified and enforceable water rights, drinking-water infrastructure, trust-fund accounts, settlement implementation funding, wastewater and watershed restoration money, and trust-land additions. Nation members and reservation households benefit from drinking-water system construction and long-term water security. Yavapai County water users benefit from the additional Cragin-Verde pipeline capacity authorized for their use. SRP benefits from reimbursement and defined operation and maintenance responsibilities for the Cragin-Verde Pipeline Project. Verde River ecosystems benefit from continued gaging and recognition of instream-flow rights. Arizona, local water users, and the United States benefit from finality and releases of major water-rights claims.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Interior, Reclamation, Treasury, USGS, SRP, CAWCD, and CAP operating agencies must administer contracts, funds, construction, environmental compliance, gaging, water deliveries, OM&R charges, indexing, and Federal Register enforceability findings. The Yavapai-Apache Nation must execute waivers, coordinate trust-fund withdrawals, satisfy settlement conditions, and accept limits on claims after enforceability. Arizona agencies, municipalities, landowners, and water users must operate within the settlement and related judgments. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of the project fund, trust fund, indexed construction adjustments, environmental compliance, and federal administration.

Key Provisions

  • Ratifies and directs execution of the Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Agreement.
  • Authorizes Reclamation to build the Tú ńlį́į́níchoh Water Infrastructure Project, including the Cragin-Verde Pipeline and YAN drinking-water system.
  • Creates infrastructure and settlement trust funds for pipeline, drinking-water, wastewater, OM&R, water projects, and watershed rehabilitation accounts.
  • Appropriates indexed transfers including $731.059 million for the Cragin-Verde Pipeline and $152.49 million for the drinking-water system.
  • Requires continued USGS Verde River gaging to monitor the Nation’s instream flow right.
  • Establishes waivers, releases, satisfaction of claims, trust-land additions, CAP water delivery terms, enforceability conditions, and limited sovereign-immunity rules.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Ratifies the Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Agreement, funds and directs construction of the Tú ńlį́į́níchoh Water Infrastructure Project, creates infrastructure and trust funds with more than $1 billion in indexed federal transfers, confirms water-right waivers and benefits, adds trust land, amends CAP water delivery rights, maintains Verde River gaging, and sets enforceability and limited sovereign-immunity rules.

Key Policy Areas

Tribal Affairs, Water Infrastructure, Public Lands, Appropriations, Environment

Primary Purpose

Ratifies the Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Agreement, funds and directs construction of the Tú ńlį́į́níchoh Water Infrastructure Project, creates infrastructure and trust funds with more than $1 billion in indexed federal transfers, confirms water-right waivers and benefits, adds trust land, amends CAP water delivery rights, maintains Verde River gaging, and sets enforceability and limited sovereign-immunity rules.

Policy Domains

Tribal Affairs Water Infrastructure Public Lands Appropriations Environment

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Yavapai-Apache Nation
  • Nation members
  • Reservation households
  • Yavapai County water users
  • Salt River Project
  • Verde River ecosystems
  • Arizona water users
  • United States as settlement party
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Nation members: , , , , , , , , , ,
Salt River Project: , , , , , , , , , ,
Arizona water users: , , , , , , , , , ,
Yavapai-Apache Nation: , , , , , , , , , ,
Reservation households: , , , , , , , , , ,
Verde River ecosystems: , , , , , , , , , ,
Yavapai County water users: , , , , , , , , , ,
United States as settlement party: , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Interior Department staff
  • Bureau of Reclamation staff
  • Treasury staff
  • USGS water staff
  • Salt River Project operators
  • Central Arizona Water Conservation District
  • CAP operating agency
  • Yavapai-Apache Nation
  • Arizona agencies
  • Municipal water providers
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Treasury staff: , , , , , , , , , ,
Arizona agencies: , , , , , , , , , ,
USGS water staff: , , , , , , , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , , , , , , , ,
CAP operating agency: , , , , , , , , , ,
Yavapai-Apache Nation: , , , , , , , , , ,
Interior Department staff: , , , , , , , , , ,
Municipal water providers: , , , , , , , , , ,
Bureau of Reclamation staff: , , , , , , , , , ,
Salt River Project operators: , , , , , , , , , ,
Central Arizona Water Conservation District: , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 26, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Dec 26, 2025

Introduced in House

Dec 26, 2025

Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Tribal Nations
16 mentions across 13 clauses
+12 positive -2 negative ?2 uncertain

Dinah Hood Allotment beneficial owners, Nation members, Yavapai-Apache Nation

Yavapai-Apache Nation, Yavapai-Apache Nation water managers face effects in multiple directions

Government
14 mentions across 13 clauses
-14 negative

Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Reclamation construction staff, Bureau of Reclamation project managers

Water Infrastructure
11 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive -3 negative

Arizona water users, CAP operating agency, CAP water users

Positive-direction: Arizona water users, CAP water users, Central Arizona Water Conservation District, Reservation households needing drinking water, Verde River Watershed water users, Yavapai County water users, Yavapai-Apache Nation drinking-water projects, Yavapai-Apache wastewater projects

Negative-direction: CAP operating agency, Lessees of YAN CAP water

Taxpayers
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

Taxpayers

Taxpayers faces effects in multiple directions

Environment
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+4 positive -1 negative

Environmental compliance staff, Environmental enforcement agencies, Verde River ecosystems

Positive-direction: Environmental enforcement agencies, Verde River ecosystems, Verde River instream flows, Watershed rehabilitation projects

Negative-direction: Environmental compliance staff

State & Local Government
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+2 positive -3 negative

Agreement parties, Settlement parties, State agencies in Arizona

Positive-direction: Agreement parties, State agencies in Arizona

Negative-direction: Settlement parties, Yavapai County land records offices

Utilities
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Salt River Project, Salt River Project operators

Positive-direction: Salt River Project

Negative-direction: Salt River Project operators

Real Estate
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Valid existing rights holders

14/17
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Tribal Affairs Water Infrastructure Public Lands Appropriations Environment

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology