HR6930-119

In Committee

Protecting Military Readiness from Offshore Wind Industrialization Interference Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Protecting Military Readiness from Offshore Wind Industrialization Interference Act requires a Defense Department Inspector General study of offshore wind industrialization in the North Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic Planning Areas. The study must assess effects on Armed Forces radar and sonar, military air and maritime traffic, FAA, NASA, and MARAD radar or sonar, Coast Guard maritime safety and lifesaving operations, military aviation flight paths, low-level military airspace, maritime navigation off the Atlantic Coast, and agencies carrying out space launch programs. It must also audit approval applications and consultation processes involving BOEM, DOD, FAA, MARAD, and the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse, and evaluate whether mitigation strategies from a 2016 DOD wind-energy report remain sufficient, achievable, and realistic. The Inspector General must report to Congress within 180 days in unclassified form, with a possible classified annex.

Who Benefits and How

Congress benefits from an independent defense oversight report before relying on agency assurances about offshore wind siting. Military radar, sonar, aviation, training, and maritime-navigation planners benefit if the report identifies interference risks and approval gaps. The Coast Guard benefits from analysis of whether projects affect maritime safety and lifesaving missions. FAA, NASA, MARAD, BOEM, and the siting clearinghouse benefit from a clearer record of consultation weaknesses or mitigation needs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Defense Department Inspector General must conduct a broad technical and process review within 180 days. Offshore wind developers in the North Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic planning areas face scrutiny and possible delay or mitigation demands if projects are found to affect military readiness or national security. BOEM, DOD, FAA, MARAD, Coast Guard, NASA, and clearinghouse staff may need to provide records and defend approval processes. Federal taxpayers bear the audit cost.

Key Provisions

  • Requires a DOD Inspector General study of offshore wind effects on military radar, sonar, aviation, maritime traffic, and training.
  • Requires review of FAA, NASA, MARAD, Coast Guard, BOEM, and siting-clearinghouse consultation and approval processes.
  • Requires analysis of whether offshore wind affects flight paths, space-launch radar or sonar, low-level airspace, maritime navigation, and Coast Guard operations.
  • Directs a report to Congress within 180 days, with an unclassified report and possible classified annex.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Defense Department Inspector General to study and report within 180 days on whether offshore wind projects in North Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic planning areas interfere with military radar, sonar, aviation, maritime navigation, Coast Guard operations, space-launch agencies, and the federal approval process.

Key Policy Areas

Defense, Energy, Maritime, Government Oversight

Primary Purpose

Requires the Defense Department Inspector General to study and report within 180 days on whether offshore wind projects in North Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic planning areas interfere with military radar, sonar, aviation, maritime navigation, Coast Guard operations, space-launch agencies, and the federal approval process.

Policy Domains

Defense Energy Maritime Government Oversight

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Congress
  • Military radar planners
  • Military sonar planners
  • Military aviation planners
  • Coast Guard maritime safety units
  • FAA safety staff
  • NASA space-launch staff
  • MARAD staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Congress:
MARAD staff:
FAA safety staff:
Military radar planners:
Military sonar planners:
NASA space-launch staff:
Military aviation planners:
Coast Guard maritime safety units:
Identified Costs
  • Defense Department Inspector General
  • Offshore wind developers
  • BOEM staff
  • DOD siting officials
  • FAA staff
  • MARAD staff
  • Coast Guard staff
  • NASA staff
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FAA staff:
BOEM staff:
NASA staff:
MARAD staff:
Coast Guard staff:
Federal taxpayers:
DOD siting officials:
Offshore wind developers:
Defense Department Inspector General:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 23, 2025

Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Harris of …

Dec 23, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Dec 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

BOEM offshore wind staff, Congress, Defense Department Inspector General

Positive-direction: Congress

Negative-direction: BOEM offshore wind staff, Defense Department Inspector General

Defense
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Military radar planners

Law Enforcement
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Coast Guard maritime safety units

Energy
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Offshore wind developers

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Energy Maritime Government Oversight

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology