HR6893-119

Reported

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Advancement for Training, Education, Restoration, and Science (WATERS) Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 18, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The WATERS Act revises the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office statute. The Office Director must have relevant research or resource-management experience and administer the Office's activities in consultation with the Chesapeake Executive Council. Program support includes integrated coastal observations, monitoring of water quality and living resources, new data technologies and usable scientific information. The Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System may support forecasts, educational information and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail.

Who Benefits and How

Elementary and secondary school students, teachers and school districts gain potential support for watershed education, field experiences, internships and teacher development. Universities and conservation organizations may collaborate on research and restoration. Permitted aquaculture operators and fishery-dependent communities may benefit from research and habitat work supporting native oysters, blue crabs, salt marshes, submerged vegetation and economically or ecologically important fish. The bill authorizes tools such as grants, contracts, leases and cooperative agreements; it does not guarantee a particular grant or appropriate a stated dollar amount.

Who Bears the Burden and How

NOAA administrators must provide the Director with authority and appropriate staff. Funded projects must undergo appropriate peer review through an effective, transparent mechanism and demonstrate scientific and technical merit. The Office must submit biennial reports with a forward-looking two-year action plan to the specified congressional committees and Commerce Secretary. Partners providing facilities or personnel must consent, with reimbursement optional. The reported text adds salt marshes expressly, removes the explicit climate-change reference from a program coordination category while retaining coastal hazards, and specifies congressional report recipients. Removing that phrase is not an express prohibition on all climate-related research.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes integrated observations, scientific monitoring and use of buoy-system data for resource management and education.
  • Authorizes watershed education grants, internships, teacher development and school-district capacity building.
  • Authorizes habitat and living-resource restoration support, including permitted aquaculture and salt marshes.
  • Requires peer review, scientific merit and consultation with the Chesapeake Executive Council.
  • Requires biennial reports and two-year action plans and provides staffing and partnership authority.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Update NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office authority for scientific monitoring, watershed education and habitat restoration, with peer review and biennial reporting.

Key Policy Areas

Environment, Education, Science

Primary Purpose

Update NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office authority for scientific monitoring, watershed education and habitat restoration, with peer review and biennial reporting.

Policy Domains

Environment Education Science

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Advancement for Training, Education, Restoration, and Science (WATERS) Act

Identified Gains
  • Chesapeake watershed students
  • Watershed school districts
  • University researchers
  • Conservation organizations
  • Permitted aquaculture operators
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
University researchers: , , , , ,
Conservation organizations: , , , , ,
Watershed school districts: , , , , ,
Chesapeake watershed students: , , , , ,
Permitted aquaculture operators: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Chesapeake Bay Office staff
  • Grant applicants
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Grant applicants: , , , , ,
Chesapeake Bay Office staff: , , , , ,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 15, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Sep 14, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Sep 14, 2026

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Sep 14, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Sep 14, 2026

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Sep 14, 2026

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5584-5586)

Sep 14, 2026

Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Aug 20, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 664.

Aug 20, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. …

Aug 20, 2026

Additional sponsors: Ms. Norton, Mr. Ivey, Ms. McClellan, and Mrs. …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Environment
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Chesapeake Bay restoration organizations, Chesapeake salt-marsh restoration organizations

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Chesapeake watershed education providers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Chesapeake Bay watershed communities

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Environment Education Science
Actor Mappings
"office"
→ NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office
"council"
→ Chesapeake Executive Council
"director"
→ Director of the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office
"administrator"
→ NOAA Administrator

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology