Chesapeake Bay Watershed Advancement for Training, Education, Restoration, and Science (WATERS) Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The WATERS Act revises the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office statute. The Office Director must have relevant research or resource-management experience and administer the Office's activities in consultation with the Chesapeake Executive Council. Program support includes integrated coastal observations, monitoring of water quality and living resources, new data technologies and usable scientific information. The Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System may support forecasts, educational information and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail.
Who Benefits and How
Elementary and secondary school students, teachers and school districts gain potential support for watershed education, field experiences, internships and teacher development. Universities and conservation organizations may collaborate on research and restoration. Permitted aquaculture operators and fishery-dependent communities may benefit from research and habitat work supporting native oysters, blue crabs, salt marshes, submerged vegetation and economically or ecologically important fish. The bill authorizes tools such as grants, contracts, leases and cooperative agreements; it does not guarantee a particular grant or appropriate a stated dollar amount.
Who Bears the Burden and How
NOAA administrators must provide the Director with authority and appropriate staff. Funded projects must undergo appropriate peer review through an effective, transparent mechanism and demonstrate scientific and technical merit. The Office must submit biennial reports with a forward-looking two-year action plan to the specified congressional committees and Commerce Secretary. Partners providing facilities or personnel must consent, with reimbursement optional. The reported text adds salt marshes expressly, removes the explicit climate-change reference from a program coordination category while retaining coastal hazards, and specifies congressional report recipients. Removing that phrase is not an express prohibition on all climate-related research.
Key Provisions
- Authorizes integrated observations, scientific monitoring and use of buoy-system data for resource management and education.
- Authorizes watershed education grants, internships, teacher development and school-district capacity building.
- Authorizes habitat and living-resource restoration support, including permitted aquaculture and salt marshes.
- Requires peer review, scientific merit and consultation with the Chesapeake Executive Council.
- Requires biennial reports and two-year action plans and provides staffing and partnership authority.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Update NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office authority for scientific monitoring, watershed education and habitat restoration, with peer review and biennial reporting.
Key Policy Areas
Environment, Education, Science
Primary Purpose
Update NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office authority for scientific monitoring, watershed education and habitat restoration, with peer review and biennial reporting.
Policy Domains
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Advancement for Training, Education, Restoration, and Science (WATERS) Act
Identified Gains
- Chesapeake watershed students
- Watershed school districts
- University researchers
- Conservation organizations
- Permitted aquaculture operators
Identified Costs
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Chesapeake Bay Office staff
- Grant applicants
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5584-5586)
Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 664.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. …
Additional sponsors: Ms. Norton, Mr. Ivey, Ms. McClellan, and Mrs. …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Chesapeake Bay restoration organizations, Chesapeake salt-marsh restoration organizations
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "office"
- → NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office
- "council"
- → Chesapeake Executive Council
- "director"
- → Director of the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office
- "administrator"
- → NOAA Administrator
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology