HR6846-119

In Committee

DEFEND Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 18, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The DEFEND Act adds a new Homeland Security Act annual assessment requirement for malicious drone threats. Within 270 days and annually for six years, the Homeland Security Secretary must report to the appropriate congressional committees on terrorism threats to the United States from global proliferation and malicious use of unmanned aircraft systems by covered foreign adversaries, including terrorist organizations. The assessment must analyze methods, trends, tactics, and technologies used to surveil, disrupt, damage, or destroy critical infrastructure, target civilians, conduct kinetic strikes or terrorist attacks, or undermine public safety or regional stability. It must evaluate whether those methods could be copied by other foreign adversaries, terrorist organizations, lone actors, or domestic violent extremists, including attacks against border security, port security, transportation systems, soft targets, mass gatherings, high-risk venues, or mass-casualty scenarios. It also covers intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance uses of drones by covered foreign adversaries and implications for homeland security preparedness and response.

Who Benefits and How

Congressional homeland security committees benefit from recurring assessments of drone-terrorism threats and preparedness gaps. Critical infrastructure operators, port authorities, border-security agencies, transportation systems, and mass-gathering venues benefit if the reports improve preparedness against malicious drones. State and local public safety agencies benefit from better federal understanding of drone tactics that could be copied domestically.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS intelligence and counterterrorism staff must produce the assessment within 270 days and annually for six years. Federal homeland security partners must gather threat, technology, and preparedness information. Foreign adversary drone programs and terrorist organizations face increased scrutiny. Congress must use the reports to oversee domestic preparedness and response capacity.

Key Provisions

  • Requires DHS to submit an unmanned-aircraft terrorism threat assessment within 270 days and annually for six years.
  • Requires analysis of foreign adversary and terrorist drone tactics against critical infrastructure, civilians, and public safety.
  • Requires evaluation of whether tactics could be copied by other adversaries, lone actors, or domestic violent extremists.
  • Covers risks to border security, port security, transportation systems, soft targets, mass gatherings, and high-risk venues.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Homeland Security Secretary to submit an annual six-year assessment on terrorism threats from foreign adversary and terrorist use of unmanned aircraft systems, covering tactics, critical infrastructure risks, civilian threats, border and port security, transportation systems, mass gatherings, domestic preparedness, and possible replication by lone actors or domestic violent extremists.

Key Policy Areas

Homeland Security, Drones, Counterterrorism

Primary Purpose

Requires the Homeland Security Secretary to submit an annual six-year assessment on terrorism threats from foreign adversary and terrorist use of unmanned aircraft systems, covering tactics, critical infrastructure risks, civilian threats, border and port security, transportation systems, mass gatherings, domestic preparedness, and possible replication by lone actors or domestic violent extremists.

Policy Domains

Homeland Security Drones Counterterrorism

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Congressional homeland security committees
  • Critical infrastructure operators
  • Port authorities
  • Border security agencies
  • Transportation systems
  • State public safety agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Port authorities: ,
Transportation systems: ,
Border security agencies: ,
State public safety agencies: ,
Critical infrastructure operators: ,
Congressional homeland security committees: ,
Identified Costs
  • DHS intelligence staff
  • DHS counterterrorism staff
  • Federal homeland security partners
  • Foreign adversary drone programs
  • Terrorist organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS intelligence staff: ,
Terrorist organizations: ,
DHS counterterrorism staff: ,
Foreign adversary drone programs: ,
Federal homeland security partners: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 19, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.

Dec 19, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.

Dec 18, 2025

Mr. Crane (for himself, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Strong, …

Dec 18, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Dec 18, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

Congressional homeland security committees, DHS intelligence staff

Positive-direction: Congressional homeland security committees

Negative-direction: DHS intelligence staff

Utilities
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Critical infrastructure operators

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

DHS counterterrorism staff

Foreign Entities
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Foreign adversary drone programs

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Homeland Security Drones Counterterrorism

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology