HR6762-119

In Committee

FEMA Administrative Reform Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 16, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The FEMA Administrative Reform Act is a narrow disaster-administration bill. It says that, notwithstanding other law, the Secretary of Homeland Security may not implement any policy requiring personal approval by the Secretary for Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster-related costs above $100,000. The legal effect is to prevent DHS leadership from creating a Secretary-level approval bottleneck for larger FEMA disaster expenditures, while leaving ordinary FEMA financial controls and statutory spending limits in place.

Who Benefits and How

FEMA disaster-response administrators benefit because regional and program officials can continue using delegated approval channels for eligible disaster spending instead of waiting for personal approval from the DHS Secretary. Disaster survivors and State emergency managers benefit indirectly if FEMA reimbursements, mission assignments, contracts, or other disaster-cost decisions move faster during response and recovery. Local governments waiting on FEMA disaster support benefit from reduced risk of centralized approval delay.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secretary of Homeland Security loses the option to centralize all FEMA disaster-cost approvals above $100,000 through a blanket policy. DHS budget officials and FEMA financial-control staff must administer disaster spending without that additional Secretary-personal approval rule, relying instead on existing controls. Federal taxpayers remain exposed to FEMA disaster spending decisions made through delegated processes, although the bill does not remove ordinary audit, procurement, or appropriations limits.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits DHS from requiring personal Secretary approval for FEMA disaster-related expenditures above $100,000.
  • Protects delegated FEMA spending workflows during disaster response and recovery.
  • Limits centralized political or executive approval control over qualifying FEMA disaster costs.
  • Preserves existing disaster-spending laws, audits, and financial controls outside the banned approval policy.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bars the Department of Homeland Security from imposing a policy requiring personal approval by the Secretary for FEMA disaster-related expenditures above $100,000, preserving faster delegated spending decisions during disaster response.

Key Policy Areas

Emergency Management, Disaster Response, Government Operations

Primary Purpose

Bars the Department of Homeland Security from imposing a policy requiring personal approval by the Secretary for FEMA disaster-related expenditures above $100,000, preserving faster delegated spending decisions during disaster response.

Policy Domains

Emergency Management Disaster Response Government Operations

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • FEMA disaster-response administrators
  • Disaster survivors
  • State emergency managers
  • Local governments receiving FEMA support
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Disaster survivors:
State emergency managers:
FEMA disaster-response administrators:
Local governments receiving FEMA support:
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
  • DHS budget officials
  • FEMA financial-control staff
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers:
DHS budget officials:
FEMA financial-control staff:
Secretary of Homeland Security:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and …

Dec 18, 2025

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H6028-6029)

Dec 16, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Dec 16, 2025

Introduced in House

Dec 16, 2025

Ms. Ross (for herself, Mrs. Foushee, Mr. Davis of North …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

FEMA disaster-response administrators

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Emergency Management Disaster Response Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"agencies"
→ ['Department of Homeland Security', 'Federal Emergency Management Agency']
"affected_groups"
→ ['Disaster survivors', 'State emergency managers', 'Local governments', 'Federal taxpayers']

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology