HR6719-119

Reported

James T. Woods Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 15, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The James T. Woods Act is a multi-title child online safety and criminal-law bill. Title I, the SAFE Act, states congressional findings about the scale and complexity of online child sex offenses and directs the United States Sentencing Commission to review and amend federal sentencing guidelines for child sexual abuse material offenses. The guideline review must account for actual and potential harm to victims and the public, changes in typical offender conduct, use of online platforms, live streaming, child sex trafficking, production of child sexual abuse material, and limits on using acquitted conduct.

Title II, the ECCHO Act, creates a new federal offense in 18 U.S.C. 2261C for coercing a minor, using interstate or foreign commerce channels or federal territorial jurisdiction, to die by suicide, attempt suicide, kill or attempt to kill another person, harm animals, inflict serious or substantial bodily injury, or commit arson. Penalties reach any term of years or life for coercion involving suicide or homicide attempts, and up to 30 years for the other covered harms. The title also updates child-exploitation reporting and CyberTipline provisions so online coercion of children is included alongside sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and enticement crimes.

Title III, the Stop Sextortion Act, criminalizes threats to distribute child sexual abuse material or a visual depiction the defendant believes involves a minor when the threat is made with intent to intimidate, coerce, extort, or cause substantial emotional distress. The bill covers threats even when no such visual depiction exists and increases maximum penalties by 10 years for offenses involving knowing use of child sexual abuse material for intimidation, coercion, extortion, or substantial emotional distress. Severability provisions preserve the rest of the titles if a provision or application is held unconstitutional.

Who Benefits and How

Department of Justice child-exploitation prosecutors benefit from clearer charging provisions for threats, attempts, conspiracies, and coercion schemes. Minors targeted by sextortion benefit because threats to distribute child sexual abuse material become explicit federal offenses. Children coerced into self-harm or violence benefit because the new section 2261C reaches coercion into suicide, homicide, severe injury, animal harm, or arson. NCMEC CyberTipline analysts benefit from statutory updates that name online coercion as reportable conduct. Federal judges and probation officers benefit from updated sentencing-guideline direction for modern online child exploitation. Families of child victims benefit if penalties better reflect intimidation, extortion, and emotional distress harms.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The United States Sentencing Commission must review and amend child sexual abuse material guidelines and policy statements. Department of Justice prosecutors must charge and prove the new threat and coercion offenses. Defendants who threaten to distribute child sexual abuse material face new charges and higher maximum penalties. Online coercers who manipulate minors into self-harm, violence, or arson face new federal criminal liability. Federal courts must handle new offenses, attempts, conspiracies, and penalty enhancements. Electronic communication service providers may face broader CyberTipline reporting expectations. Federal defenders and defense attorneys must litigate the new offenses and enhanced penalties.

Key Provisions

  • Requires the Sentencing Commission to update guidelines for child sexual abuse material offenses.
  • Creates a federal offense for coercing a minor into suicide, attempted suicide, homicide, serious injury, animal harm, or arson.
  • Requires penalties of any term of years or life for coercion involving suicide or homicide and up to 30 years for other covered harms.
  • Expands CyberTipline and child-exploitation reporting statutes to include online coercion of children.
  • Creates federal liability for threats to distribute child sexual abuse material or depictions believed to involve minors.
  • Applies threat penalties even when no visual depiction exists.
  • Tightens maximum penalties by 10 years for covered CSAM intimidation, coercion, extortion, or emotional-distress offenses.
  • Adds severability clauses for the ECCHO Act and Stop Sextortion Act titles.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Combines child-online-safety criminal-law measures by directing the Sentencing Commission to update child sexual abuse material guidelines, creating a federal offense for coercing minors into suicide, homicide, animal harm, serious injury, or arson, expanding cybertip reporting to online coercion, criminalizing threats to distribute child sexual abuse material, increasing penalties for such threats, and adding severability clauses.

Key Policy Areas

Criminal Justice, Child Protection, Online Safety, Federal Sentencing

Primary Purpose

Combines child-online-safety criminal-law measures by directing the Sentencing Commission to update child sexual abuse material guidelines, creating a federal offense for coercing minors into suicide, homicide, animal harm, serious injury, or arson, expanding cybertip reporting to online coercion, criminalizing threats to distribute child sexual abuse material, increasing penalties for such threats, and adding severability clauses.

Policy Domains

Criminal Justice Child Protection Online Safety Federal Sentencing

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Department of Justice child-exploitation prosecutors
  • Minors targeted by sextortion
  • Children coerced into self-harm
  • NCMEC CyberTipline analysts
  • Federal judges
  • Families of child victims
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal judges: , , , ,
Families of child victims: , , , ,
NCMEC CyberTipline analysts: , , , ,
Minors targeted by sextortion: , , , ,
Children coerced into self-harm: , , , ,
Department of Justice child-exploitation prosecutors: , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • United States Sentencing Commission
  • Department of Justice prosecutors
  • Defendants threatening CSAM distribution
  • Online coercers targeting minors
  • Federal courts
  • Electronic communication service providers
  • Federal defenders
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal courts: , , , ,
Federal defenders: , , , ,
Online coercers targeting minors: , , , ,
Department of Justice prosecutors: , , , ,
United States Sentencing Commission: , , , ,
Defendants threatening CSAM distribution: , , , ,
Electronic communication service providers: , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 2, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Mar 2, 2026

Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an …

Mar 2, 2026

Reported by Mr. Grassley, with an amendment

Feb 26, 2026

Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an …

Jan 13, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Jan 13, 2026

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the …

Jan 12, 2026

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H628-630)

Jan 12, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jan 12, 2026

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Jan 12, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Individual And Family Services
21 mentions across 13 clauses
+21 positive

Child sexual abuse survivors, Children coerced into self-harm, Families of child victims

Law Enforcement
13 mentions across 13 clauses
+13 positive

Federal child-exploitation prosecutors, Federal prosecutors handling child coercion, Federal prosecutors handling sextortion

Criminal Defendants
12 mentions across 12 clauses
-12 negative

Defendants convicted of CSAM offenses, Defendants threatening CSAM distribution, Online coercers targeting minors

Federal Courts
12 mentions across 12 clauses
+1 positive -11 negative

Federal courts hearing child coercion cases, Federal courts hearing sextortion cases, Federal judges sentencing CSAM defendants

Positive-direction: Federal judges sentencing CSAM defendants

Negative-direction: Federal courts hearing child coercion cases, Federal courts hearing sextortion cases

Federal Sentencing
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

United States Sentencing Commission staff

15/15
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Criminal Justice Child Protection Online Safety Federal Sentencing
Actor Mappings
"doj"
→ Department of Justice
"ussc"
→ United States Sentencing Commission
"ncmec"
→ National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
"courts"
→ Federal courts

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology