HR6704-119

In Committee

Drunk Driving Prevention and Enforcement Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Dec 15, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Drunk Driving Prevention and Enforcement Act creates three major programs. First, DOT through NHTSA must run a competitive prize program for consumer-ready passive anti-drunk-driving technology, with a prize purse of at least 45 million dollars and a 50 million dollar Highway Trust Fund authorization available until fiscal year 2028. The prize targets breath-based, touch-based, sensor, or other in-vehicle technology that prevents a driver at or above the legal blood alcohol limit from operating a vehicle. Second, DOT must establish a Traffic Safety Enforcement Center of Excellence within one year to provide state highway safety offices and law enforcement agencies with centralized expertise, training, data tools, hot-spot detection, drug-impaired enforcement strategies, speed management, model demonstrations, technical assistance, and national convening. The center receives 5 million dollars per year from fiscal year 2026 onward. Third, NHTSA must create a national drug-involved crash data collection system with standardized toxicology data, linked crash and medical records, model protocols, sentinel sites, annual public reports, state grants, possible non-federal match requirements, and a 30 million dollar annual authorization for fiscal years 2026 through 2031.

Who Benefits and How

Technology developers, vehicle safety researchers, state highway safety offices, law enforcement agencies, traffic safety researchers, victims and survivors, public health leaders, and road users benefit from prize incentives, technical assistance, better enforcement tools, and more complete drug-impaired crash data.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DOT and NHTSA staff must administer prize competitions, notices, reports, the Center of Excellence, training, data systems, model protocols, sentinel sites, state grants, privacy safeguards, and congressional reporting. State agencies and toxicology labs may need to collect standardized data, link records, provide non-federal matches unless hardship applies, and follow model protocols. Highway Trust Fund resources bear the authorizations.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes 50 million dollars for a passive anti-drunk-driving technology prize program with a prize purse of at least 45 million dollars.
  • Requires DOT to establish a Traffic Safety Enforcement Center of Excellence within one year and authorizes 5 million dollars per year.
  • Creates a national drug-involved crash data collection system with toxicology, medical, coroner, hospital, and EMS data links.
  • Authorizes 30 million dollars per year from fiscal years 2026 through 2031 for drug-involved crash data grants and implementation.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates federal prize, training-center, and crash-data programs to accelerate passive anti-drunk-driving technology and strengthen impaired-driving enforcement.

Key Policy Areas

Transportation, Law Enforcement, Technology, Public Health

Primary Purpose

Creates federal prize, training-center, and crash-data programs to accelerate passive anti-drunk-driving technology and strengthen impaired-driving enforcement.

Policy Domains

Transportation Law Enforcement Technology Public Health

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • technology developers
  • state highway safety offices
  • law enforcement agencies
  • traffic safety researchers
  • road users
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
road users: , , ,
technology developers: , , ,
law enforcement agencies: , , ,
traffic safety researchers: , , ,
state highway safety offices: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of Transportation staff
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration staff
  • state agencies
  • toxicology labs
  • Highway Trust Fund
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
state agencies: , , ,
toxicology labs: , , ,
Highway Trust Fund: , , ,
Department of Transportation staff: , , ,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration staff: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Dec 15, 2025

Ms. Gillen (for herself, Mr. Lawler, and Mrs. Dingell) introduced …

Dec 15, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Dec 15, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative

Department of Transportation center staff, Highway Trust Fund resources, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data staff

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

road users exposed to drunk driving, road users protected by anti-drunk-driving technology, road users protected by impaired-driving prevention

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -1 negative

state crash data agencies reporting toxicology data, state highway safety offices receiving technical assistance, state toxicology labs receiving grants

Positive-direction: state highway safety offices receiving technical assistance, state toxicology labs receiving grants

Negative-direction: state crash data agencies reporting toxicology data

Technology
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

anti-drunk-driving technology developers, technology developers described in findings

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

passenger vehicle manufacturers integrating safety technology

Law Enforcement
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

law enforcement agencies receiving traffic safety support

Healthcare
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

public health leaders participating in traffic safety convening

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

traffic safety researchers using drug crash data

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Transportation Law Enforcement Technology Public Health
Actor Mappings
"Secretary"
→ Secretary of Transportation
"Administrator"
→ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Administrator

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology