HIRRE Prosecutors Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The HIRRE Prosecutors Act requires the Attorney General to establish within one year a competitive grant program to help state, territorial, local, and tribal governments hire prosecutors. Prosecutor offices may apply annually, and funds may only be used to hire, retain, and train prosecutors or support staff. DOJ may use any department component to run the program. The Attorney General may prioritize applications to hire and train new prosecutors or support staff, rehire prosecutors laid off due to budget reductions, and serve tribal, remote, or rural jurisdictions. The federal share is capped at 75 percent, but DOJ may waive the 25 percent match when equitable given financial circumstances. Funds may not supplant state, local, tribal, or Bureau of Indian Affairs funding, though forfeiture equitable sharing assets and certain tribal prosecutorial funds may count toward the nonfederal share. Each project must include monitoring and data collection, DOJ must evaluate projects, grantees may have to submit monitoring and evaluation results, and DOJ may revoke or suspend noncompliant grants. The bill authorizes $10 million per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Who Benefits and How
State, local, territorial, and tribal prosecutor offices benefit from grant funding to hire, retain, and train prosecutors and support staff. Rural, remote, and tribal jurisdictions benefit from preferential consideration. Communities benefit if prosecutor staffing shortages are reduced and case handling improves. Prosecutors who were laid off due to budget reductions may benefit from rehire funding. DOJ benefits from monitoring and evaluation data about prosecutor staffing grants.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Attorney General and DOJ grant staff must create the program, review applications, manage match waivers, enforce anti-supplanting rules, collect monitoring data, evaluate projects, and suspend or revoke grants when necessary. Recipient prosecutor offices must apply, provide the nonfederal share unless waived, track activities and accomplishments, submit data, and avoid supplanting existing funds. State, local, and tribal budget offices must coordinate grant funding with existing prosecutor budgets. Federal taxpayers fund the $10 million annual authorization.
Key Provisions
- Requires DOJ to establish a prosecutor hiring grant program within one year.
- Authorizes grants for hiring, retaining, and training prosecutors or prosecutor-office support staff.
- Allows priority for new hires, rehiring after budget layoffs, and tribal, remote, or rural jurisdictions.
- Caps the federal share at 75 percent while allowing equitable match waivers.
- Requires monitoring, evaluation, data collection, and anti-supplanting compliance.
- Authorizes $10 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Authorizes a DOJ competitive grant program within one year to help state, territorial, local, and tribal prosecutor offices hire, retain, and train prosecutors and support staff, with rural, remote, and tribal preferences, 75 percent federal share, matching waivers, monitoring, evaluation, anti-supplanting rules, and $10 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Key Policy Areas
Law Enforcement, Prosecutors, Federal Grants, Tribal Government
Primary Purpose
Authorizes a DOJ competitive grant program within one year to help state, territorial, local, and tribal prosecutor offices hire, retain, and train prosecutors and support staff, with rural, remote, and tribal preferences, 75 percent federal share, matching waivers, monitoring, evaluation, anti-supplanting rules, and $10 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- State prosecutor offices
- Local prosecutor offices
- Tribal prosecutor offices
- Rural jurisdictions
- Remote jurisdictions
- Communities
Identified Costs
- Attorney General
- DOJ grant staff
- Recipient prosecutor offices
- State budget offices
- Tribal budget offices
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Panetta (for himself, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Neguse, Mr. Kennedy …
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Justice Department officials administering the prosecutors grant program, State, local, territorial, and tribal prosecutors' offices eligible for hiring and training grants
Positive-direction: State, local, territorial, and tribal prosecutors' offices eligible for hiring and training grants
Negative-direction: Justice Department officials administering the prosecutors grant program
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "BIA"
- → Bureau of Indian Affairs
- "DOJ"
- → Department of Justice
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology