HR6660-119

In Committee

Replace Animal Tests Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Dec 11, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Replace Animal Tests Act restricts animal testing data submitted to covered agencies for products or substances. Covered agencies are CPSC, USDA, EPA, and FDA. Regulated entities may not submit data derived from animal test methods if a covered agency determines that a non-animal test method is available to meet the relevant information requirement or if the agency has issued a waiver from animal-test data. Exceptions cover pre-enactment data, animal tests conducted outside the United States to satisfy foreign regulators, data requested after an agency finds existing data insufficient and no scientifically satisfactory non-animal method was practicably available, and animal tests specifically requested in writing with a clear agency justification. When animal testing is still used, entities must minimize the number of animals and reduce pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm. Agencies may refuse violative data and impose civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation. Within one year, each covered agency must issue guidance on non-animal methods, revise regulations where appropriate, eliminate corresponding animal-data requirements, publish annual progress reports, and make non-proprietary data public.

Who Benefits and How

Non-animal test developers benefit because covered agencies must issue guidance and accept non-animal methods where available. Animal welfare advocates benefit from restrictions on unnecessary animal testing and minimization rules when testing remains unavoidable. Regulated companies benefit from clearer pathways to use accepted non-animal methods. Consumers and patients may benefit if modern test methods produce useful safety data without duplicative animal studies. The public benefits from annual agency progress reports and public data on animals used, species, test types, waivers, and accepted methods.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Regulated entities must determine whether accepted non-animal methods are available, justify animal-test submissions, minimize animal use, and face refusal or civil penalties for violations. CPSC, USDA, EPA, and FDA must write guidance, revise regulations, track waivers, publish annual reports, protect proprietary and personal information, and maintain public web data. Companies relying on legacy animal testing may need to change study design and compliance systems. Foreign-compliance animal data must be separated from domestic submissions. Federal taxpayers fund agency guidance, reporting, and enforcement work.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits animal-test-derived data submissions when accepted non-animal methods are available or an animal-data waiver has been issued.
  • Allows exceptions for pre-enactment data, foreign regulatory data, agency-requested data, and justified animal tests.
  • Requires regulated entities to minimize animal numbers and animal suffering when animal testing is unavoidable.
  • Authorizes agencies to refuse violative data and impose civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation.
  • Requires covered agencies within one year to issue guidance, revise regulations, eliminate corresponding animal-data requirements, and publish annual progress reports.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bars regulated entities from submitting animal-test-derived data to CPSC, USDA, EPA, or FDA when accepted non-animal methods are available or animal-data requirements are waived, requires minimization of animal use when animal testing is unavoidable, authorizes refusal and penalties, and mandates agency guidance, regulation updates, annual reports, and public data.

Key Policy Areas

Animal Testing, Consumer Products, Food and Drug, Environmental Regulation, Research

Primary Purpose

Bars regulated entities from submitting animal-test-derived data to CPSC, USDA, EPA, or FDA when accepted non-animal methods are available or animal-data requirements are waived, requires minimization of animal use when animal testing is unavoidable, authorizes refusal and penalties, and mandates agency guidance, regulation updates, annual reports, and public data.

Policy Domains

Animal Testing Consumer Products Food and Drug Environmental Regulation Research

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Non-animal test developers
  • Animal welfare advocates
  • Regulated companies
  • Consumers
  • Patients
  • Public researchers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Patients:
Consumers:
Public researchers:
Regulated companies:
Animal welfare advocates:
Non-animal test developers:
Identified Costs
  • Regulated entities
  • CPSC staff
  • USDA staff
  • EPA staff
  • FDA staff
  • Companies using animal testing
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
EPA staff:
FDA staff:
CPSC staff:
USDA staff:
Federal taxpayers:
Regulated entities:
Companies using animal testing:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 13, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Jan 13, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.

Dec 11, 2025

Mr. Moskowitz (for himself, Ms. Schakowsky, and Mr. Thanedar) introduced …

Dec 11, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …

Dec 11, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
4 mentions across 1 clause
-4 negative

CPSC staff, EPA staff, FDA staff

Manufacturing
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Chemical manufacturers, Consumer product companies

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Non-animal test developers

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Animal welfare advocates

Food & Beverage
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Food manufacturers

Pharmaceuticals
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Pharmaceutical companies

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Animal Testing Consumer Products Food and Drug Environmental Regulation Research
Actor Mappings
"EPA"
→ Environmental Protection Agency
"FDA"
→ Food and Drug Administration
"CPSC"
→ Consumer Product Safety Commission
"USDA"
→ Department of Agriculture

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"" §animal test method

"" §non-animal test method

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology