Biological Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Biological Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2025 states Congress's view that the People's Republic of China is trying to access and exploit sensitive U.S. data and intellectual property to modernize its military, intelligence, and security apparatuses, support human rights abuses, and develop dual-use technologies. It connects that threat to China's military-civil fusion strategy and laws requiring PRC citizens and organizations to cooperate with national security and intelligence work.
The operative provision amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. Within one year, the Secretary must require a license for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer to a foreign entity of concern of a digital sequence of synthetic DNA or RNA designed by humans or artificial intelligence systems. The bill exempts information already excluded under Export Administration Regulations section 734.3(b). It defines digital sequence, foreign country of concern, foreign entity of concern, and synthetic DNA or RNA.
Who Benefits and How
Department of Commerce export-control policymakers benefit from statutory definitions for synthetic DNA or RNA digital sequences. U.S. national security agencies benefit because sensitive synthetic-biology sequence data going to foreign entities of concern would face a license screen. U.S. biotechnology intellectual-property owners benefit from a new export-control barrier for digital sequence information. Defense Department planners benefit if synthetic-biology data is harder to transfer to PRC-linked entities. Human-rights advocates benefit if the license screen reduces access to tools that could support abuses. BIS export-control staff benefit from a specific statutory hook for licensing covered sequence transfers.
Who Bears the Burden and How
BIS export-control staff must create and administer the license requirement within one year. U.S. synthetic-biology exporters must determine whether digital DNA or RNA sequence transfers require licenses. DNA synthesis companies must screen transfers involving foreign entities of concern. AI-enabled biology platform operators must handle licensing risk for designed sequence files. Foreign entities of concern face a new barrier to accessing covered sequence information. University research compliance offices and research collaborations with foreign-country-of-concern links may need legal review before sharing covered data.
Key Provisions
- Requires congressional findings on PRC efforts to access U.S. data and intellectual property.
- Restricts synthetic-biology data transfers connected to military-civil fusion and PRC national-security laws.
- Adds a new Export Control Reform Act section on synthetic DNA or RNA digital sequences.
- Requires a license within one year for exports, reexports, or in-country transfers to foreign entities of concern.
- Expands export-control coverage to digital sequences designed by humans or artificial intelligence systems.
- Provides an exception for information described in Export Administration Regulations section 734.3(b).
- Defines digital sequence, foreign country of concern, foreign entity of concern, and synthetic DNA or RNA.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires export-control licenses within one year for exports, reexports, or in-country transfers to foreign entities of concern of human- or AI-designed digital sequences of synthetic DNA or RNA, while stating congressional findings that PRC access to sensitive U.S. data and biological intellectual property threatens national security.
Key Policy Areas
Export Controls, Biotechnology, National Security, China
Primary Purpose
Requires export-control licenses within one year for exports, reexports, or in-country transfers to foreign entities of concern of human- or AI-designed digital sequences of synthetic DNA or RNA, while stating congressional findings that PRC access to sensitive U.S. data and biological intellectual property threatens national security.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Department of Commerce export-control policymakers
- U.S. national security agencies
- U.S. biotechnology intellectual-property owners
- Defense Department planners
- Human-rights advocates
- BIS export-control staff
Identified Costs
- BIS export-control staff
- U.S. synthetic-biology exporters
- DNA synthesis companies
- AI-enabled biology platform operators
- Foreign entities of concern
- University research compliance offices
- Research collaborations with foreign-country-of-concern links
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedOrdered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute …
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Mr. Davidson (for himself, Ms. Houlahan, Mrs. Bice, Mr. McCaul, …
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
DNA synthesis companies, U.S. biotechnology intellectual-property owners, U.S. synthetic-biology exporters
Positive-direction: U.S. biotechnology intellectual-property owners
Negative-direction: DNA synthesis companies, U.S. synthetic-biology exporters
AI-enabled biology platform operators, PRC-linked technology firms
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "bis"
- → Bureau of Industry and Security
- "secretary"
- → Secretary of Commerce
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology