HR6605-119

In Committee

Secure Our Skies Drone Safety Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Dec 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Secure Our Skies Drone Safety Act directs the Comptroller General to study unmanned aircraft systems and counter-UAS systems used by federal, state, local, and Tribal agencies and report to Congress within one year. The report must recommend legal authorities and policy changes to help agencies counter drone threats, identify steps to strengthen U.S. and allied drone manufacturing and simplify UAS procurement, and provide data on deployed drones, drones bought by state, local, and Tribal agencies from entities in adversarial nations, how many drones are domestically produced, cost barriers to buying U.S. or trusted-nation drones, how often drones are used and for what purposes, operator training or certification, governing policies or protocols, privacy protections, and counter-drone strategies and training.

Who Benefits and How

Congress benefits from a comprehensive picture of public-agency drone use, foreign-adversary sourcing, domestic production, procurement barriers, and counter-drone readiness. Federal, state, local, and Tribal agencies may benefit from policy recommendations that clarify authorities, training, privacy expectations, and procurement pathways. Domestic and allied drone manufacturers could benefit if the report supports procurement changes favoring trusted supply chains.

Who Bears the Burden and How

GAO bears the study and reporting burden. Federal, state, local, and Tribal agencies may need to provide inventories, purchase records, usage data, training information, privacy policies, and counter-drone protocols. Agencies using drones from adversarial-nation entities may face scrutiny, future procurement restrictions, or cost pressure if Congress acts on recommendations to shift toward domestic or allied UAS suppliers.

Key Provisions

  • Requires GAO to study public-agency UAS use and counter-UAS systems within one year.
  • Requires recommendations on legal authorities and policies needed to counter drone threats.
  • Requires recommendations to strengthen U.S. and allied UAS manufacturing and simplify procurement.
  • Requires data on adversarial-nation drone purchases by state, local, and Tribal agencies, domestic production, cost barriers, use frequency, purposes, operator training, policies, privacy protections, and countermeasures.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires GAO to report within one year on federal, state, local, and Tribal agency drone use, counter-drone systems, adversarial-nation drone purchases, domestic production, policy gaps, privacy protections, and training.

Key Policy Areas

Aviation, Law Enforcement, National Security, Government Operations

Primary Purpose

Requires GAO to report within one year on federal, state, local, and Tribal agency drone use, counter-drone systems, adversarial-nation drone purchases, domestic production, policy gaps, privacy protections, and training.

Policy Domains

Aviation Law Enforcement National Security Government Operations

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Congress
  • Law enforcement agencies
  • Domestic drone manufacturers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Congress:
Law enforcement agencies:
Domestic drone manufacturers:
Identified Costs
  • Government Accountability Office
  • Public agencies
  • Adversarial-nation drone suppliers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Public agencies:
Government Accountability Office:
Adversarial-nation drone suppliers:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 2, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Dec 10, 2025

Mr. Vasquez (for himself and Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia) introduced …

Dec 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Dec 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Government Accountability Office

Law Enforcement
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Law enforcement agencies

Tribal Nations
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Tribal agencies

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Domestic drone manufacturers

Foreign Entities
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Adversarial-nation drone suppliers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Aviation Law Enforcement National Security Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"UAS"
→ Unmanned aircraft systems
"Comptroller General"
→ Head of the Government Accountability Office

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology