HR6566-119

In Committee

Recycling Technology Innovation Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Recycling Technology Innovation Act amends the Clean Air Act definition of solid waste incineration unit. A unit that converts or transforms plastic or post-use polymers through pyrolysis, gasification, depolymerization, catalytic cracking, solvolysis, or chemolysis is excluded from that definition if at least 50 percent by mass of its outputs, calculated by an EPA method set by rule, are products. Owners or operators of conversion units that do not meet that automatic exclusion can petition EPA to be treated as excluded. EPA must publish the complete petition, seek public comment, and approve or deny it within 180 days. The bill defines product as a usable material output with a consumer, commercial, or industrial application that can be sold or used as an input in another product, and excludes electricity, heat, steam, soot, char, dust, and ash.

Who Benefits and How

Plastic conversion facilities benefit because qualifying processes can avoid incinerator-style Clean Air Act treatment when they produce usable products. Recycling technology developers benefit from a clearer federal pathway for pyrolysis, gasification, depolymerization, catalytic cracking, solvolysis, and chemolysis projects. Manufacturers using recycled polymer outputs benefit if more facilities can supply product inputs. Petitioning facility owners benefit from a defined EPA process and 180-day decision deadline.

Who Bears the Burden and How

EPA must write the output-mass calculation rule, publish petitions, manage public comments, and approve or deny petitions within 180 days. Facility owners must document that outputs qualify as products or prepare petitions. Environmental advocates and local communities must monitor petitions and comment if they believe a unit should remain regulated as incineration. State air regulators may need to adjust permitting treatment for qualifying facilities.

Key Provisions

  • Amends the Clean Air Act definition of solid waste incineration unit for plastic and post-use-polymer conversion units.
  • Excludes qualifying units using pyrolysis, gasification, depolymerization, catalytic cracking, solvolysis, or chemolysis when at least 50 percent of outputs are products.
  • Requires EPA to establish the output-mass calculation method by rule.
  • Creates a public petition process with comment opportunity and a 180-day EPA decision deadline.
  • Defines product and excludes electricity, heat, steam, soot, char, dust, and ash.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Excludes qualifying advanced plastic and post-use-polymer conversion units from Clean Air Act solid-waste-incineration-unit treatment when at least 50 percent of outputs by mass are products, and creates a 180-day EPA petition process for other conversion units.

Key Policy Areas

Environment, Manufacturing, Recycling

Primary Purpose

Excludes qualifying advanced plastic and post-use-polymer conversion units from Clean Air Act solid-waste-incineration-unit treatment when at least 50 percent of outputs by mass are products, and creates a 180-day EPA petition process for other conversion units.

Policy Domains

Environment Manufacturing Recycling

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Plastic conversion facilities
  • Recycling technology developers
  • Manufacturers using recycled polymer outputs
  • Petitioning facility owners
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Petitioning facility owners:
Plastic conversion facilities:
Recycling technology developers:
Manufacturers using recycled polymer outputs:
Identified Costs
  • EPA rulemaking staff
  • Facility owners filing petitions
  • State air regulators
  • Environmental advocates
  • Local communities near facilities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
EPA rulemaking staff:
State air regulators:
Environmental advocates:
Facility owners filing petitions:
Local communities near facilities:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 10, 2025

Mr. Crenshaw (for himself and Mr. Palmer) introduced the following …

Dec 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Dec 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Manufacturing
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -1 negative

Facility owners filing petitions, Plastic conversion facilities, Post-use polymer processors

Positive-direction: Plastic conversion facilities, Post-use polymer processors

Negative-direction: Facility owners filing petitions

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

EPA rulemaking staff

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Environmental advocates

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Environment Manufacturing Recycling
Actor Mappings
"agencies"
→ ['EPA']
"industry"
→ ['Plastic conversion facilities', 'Recycling technology developers']

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology